TOWARDS BETTER PREDICTION OF BUILDING PERFORMANCE: A WORKBENCH TO ANALYZE UNCERTAINTY IN BUILDING SIMULATION

In this paper, the authors present the Georgia Tech Uncertainty and Risk Analysis Workbench (GURAW), a software toolkit that explicitly captures uncertainty about the physical properties of the building and the energy models used to predict its performance. The workbench provides a UQ Repository, giving energy modellers direct access to previously quantified uncertainty distributions for a variety of parameters and models. The workbench also provides automatic identification and modification of parameter values in the input file for the simulation. Together with an intuitive user interface, these capabilities serve to increase the ease with which uncertainty and risk analysis is performed. As such, the methods become more accessible to the building design and retrofit profession at large, rather than being restricted to uncertainty analysis researchers. The predictions developed can serve as a basis for downstream riskconscious design and retrofit decisions, for instance as part of contractual protocols for improved building performance.

[1]  Pieter de Wilde,et al.  Design analysis integration: supporting the selection of energy saving building components , 2002 .

[2]  Christina J. Hopfe,et al.  Uncertainty analysis for building performance simulation - a comparison of four tools , 2007 .

[3]  Michael S. Eldred,et al.  Uncertainty Quantification In Large Computational Engineering Models , 2001 .

[4]  Paul Strachan,et al.  Practical application of uncertainty analysis , 2001 .

[5]  Huafen Hu,et al.  Risk-conscious design of off-grid solar energy houses , 2009 .

[6]  Inhan Kim,et al.  SELF-ACTIVATING UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS FOR BIM-BASED BUILDING ENERGY PERFORMANCE SIMULATIONS , 2011 .

[7]  M. D. McKay,et al.  A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code , 2000 .

[8]  Yi Zhang,et al.  Parallel EnergyPlus and the development of a parametric analysis tool. , 2009 .

[9]  Gregor P. Henze,et al.  UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS IN BUILDING SIMULATION WITH MONTE CARLO TECHNIQUES , 2010 .

[10]  John S. Gero,et al.  Uncertainty and the design of building subsystems—A dynamic programming approach , 1977 .

[11]  Daniel Macumber,et al.  OpenStudio: An Open Source Integrated Analysis Platform , 2011 .

[12]  Richard J. Beckman,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code , 2000, Technometrics.

[13]  David Draper,et al.  Assessment and Propagation of Model Uncertainty , 2011 .

[14]  Yeonsook Heo,et al.  Bayesian calibration of building energy models for energy retrofit decision-making under uncertainty , 2011 .

[15]  H. Fawcett.  Manual of Political Economy , 1995 .

[16]  Hyeun Jun Moon,et al.  Assessing Mold Risks in Buildings under Uncertainty , 2009 .

[17]  Yi Jiang,et al.  Stochastic analysis of building thermal processes , 1993 .

[18]  Godfried Augenbroe,et al.  Analysis of uncertainty in building design evaluations and its implications , 2002 .

[19]  James S. Hodges,et al.  Uncertainty, Policy Analysis and Statistics , 1987 .

[20]  Godfried Augenbroe,et al.  Uncertainty quantification of microclimate variables in building energy simulation , 2011 .

[21]  S. Leigh,et al.  Probability and Random Processes for Electrical Engineering , 1989 .

[22]  George A. Hazelrigg,et al.  Validation of engineering design alternative selection methods , 2003 .

[23]  Zheng O'Neill,et al.  Uncertainty and sensitivity decomposition of building energy models , 2012 .

[24]  Christiaan J. J. Paredis,et al.  A FRAMEWORK FOR GENERATING STOCHASTIC METEOROLOGICAL YEARS FOR RISK-CONSCIOUS DESIGN OF BUILDINGS , 2012 .