High Efficiency and Low Emissions from a Port-Injected Engine with Neat Alcohol Fuels

Ongoing work with methanol- and ethanol-fueled engines at the EPA’s National Vehicle and Fuel Emissions Laboratory has demonstrated improved brake thermal efficiencies over the baseline diesel engine and low steady state NOx, HC and CO, along with inherently low PM emissions. In addition, the engine is expected to have significant system cost advantages compared with a similar diesel, mainly by virtue of its low-pressure port fuel injection (PFI) system. While recognizing the considerable challenge associated with cold start, the alcohol-fueled engine nonetheless offers the advantages of being a more efficient, cleaner alternative to gasoline and diesel engines. The unique EPA engine used for this work is a turbocharged, PFI spark-ignited 1.9L, 4-cylinder engine with 19.5:1 compression ratio. The engine operates unthrottled using stoichiometric fueling from full power to near idle conditions, using exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) and intake manifold pressure to modulate engine load. As a result, the engine, operating on methanol fuel, demonstrates better than 40% brake thermal efficiency from 6.5 to 15 bar BMEP at speeds ranging from 1200 to 3500 rpm, while achieving low steady state emissions using conventional aftertreatment strategies. Similar emissions levels were realized with ethanol fuel, but with slightly higher BSFC due to reduced spark authority at this compression ratio. These characteristics make the engine attractive for hybrid vehicle applications, for which it was initially developed, yet the significant expansion of the high-efficiency islands suggest that it may have broader appeal to conventional powertrain systems. With further refinement, this clean, more efficient and less expensive alternative to today’s petroleum-based IC engines should be considered as a bridging technology to the possible future of hydrogen as a transportation fuel.

[1]  David Checkel,et al.  Emissions Effects of Alternative Fuels in Light-Duty and Heavy-Duty Vehicles , 2000 .

[2]  Noboru Miyamoto,et al.  Ultra Low Emission and High Performance Diesel Combustion with Highly Oxygenated Fuel , 2000 .

[3]  Douglas M. Leone,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF AN ETHANOL-FUELED, ULTRA-LOW EMISSIONS VEHICLE , 1998 .

[4]  Noboru Miyamoto,et al.  Smokeless, Low NOx, High Thermal Efficiency, and Low Noise Diesel Combustion with Oxygenated Agents as Main Fuel , 1998 .

[5]  Takashi Sakamoto,et al.  Combustion and NOx emission characteristics in a DI methanol engine using supercharging with EGR , 1997 .

[6]  D. P. Gardiner,et al.  Improving the Fuel Economy of Stoichiometrically Fuelled S.I. Engines by Means of EGR and Enhanced Ignition - A Comparison of Gasoline, Methanol and Natural Gas , 1995 .

[7]  Veniero Giglio,et al.  High Efficiency Stoichiometric Spark Ignition Engines , 1994 .

[8]  K. Hellman,et al.  Evaluation of a Passenger Car Equipped with a Direct Injection Neat Methanol Engine , 1992 .

[9]  William H. Haight,et al.  Methanol preignition temperature behavior , 1991 .

[10]  M. Babu,et al.  A Simulation Model for a Methanol Fueled Turbocharged Multi-Cylinder Automotive Spark Ignition Engine , 1991 .

[11]  D. P. Gardiner,et al.  Review of the Cold Starting Performance of Methanol and High Methanol Blends in Spark Ignition Engines: High Methanol Blends , 1990 .

[12]  Takayuki Suzuki,et al.  Development of Methanol Engine with Autoignition for Low NOx Emission and Better Fuel Economy , 1989 .

[13]  U. Hilger,et al.  Prototype Development Of A Methanol Engine For Heavy-Duty Application-Performance And Emissions , 1989 .

[14]  R. T. Johnson,et al.  Methanol as a Fuel for a Lean Turbocharged Spark ignition Engine , 1989 .

[15]  G. W. Rogers,et al.  Influence of the methanol fuel composition on performance and exhaust emissions of diesel-derived alcohol engines , 1988 .

[16]  Nobuo Iwai,et al.  A Study on Cold Startability and Mixture Formation of High-Percentage Methanol Blends , 1988 .

[17]  William B. Clemmens.  Performance of Sequential Port Fuel Injection on a High Compression Ratio Neat Methanol Engine , 1987 .

[18]  R. M. Siewert,et al.  Unassisted Cold Starts to −29°C and Steady-State Tests of a Direct-Injection Stratified-Charge (DISC) Engine Operated on Heat Alcohols , 1987 .

[19]  Sidney J. Lestz,et al.  The Laminar Burning Velocity of Isooctane, N - Heptane, Methanol, Methane and Propane at Elevated T , 1980 .

[20]  N. D. Brinkman,et al.  EFFECT OF COMPRESSION RATIO ON EXHAUST EMISSIONS AND PERFORMANCE OF A METHANOL-FUELED SINGLE-CYLINDER ENGINE , 1977 .

[21]  Richard L. Bechtold,et al.  Alternative fuels guidebook , 1997 .

[22]  John B. Heywood,et al.  Internal combustion engine fundamentals , 1988 .