ERCC2 Helicase Domain Mutations Confer Nucleotide Excision Repair Deficiency and Drive Cisplatin Sensitivity in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Purpose: DNA-damaging agents comprise the backbone of systemic treatment for many tumor types; however, few reliable predictive biomarkers are available to guide use of these agents. In muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), cisplatin-based chemotherapy improves survival, yet response varies widely among patients. Here, we sought to define the role of the nucleotide excision repair (NER) gene ERCC2 as a biomarker predictive of response to cisplatin in MIBC. Experimental Design: Somatic missense mutations in ERCC2 are associated with improved response to cisplatin-based chemotherapy; however, clinically identified ERCC2 mutations are distributed throughout the gene, and the impact of individual ERCC2 variants on NER capacity and cisplatin sensitivity is unknown. We developed a microscopy-based NER assay to profile ERCC2 mutations observed retrospectively in prior studies and prospectively within the context of an institution-wide tumor profiling initiative. In addition, we created the first ERCC2-deficient bladder cancer preclinical model for studying the impact of ERCC2 loss of function. Results: We used our functional assay to test the NER capacity of clinically observed ERCC2 mutations and found that most ERCC2 helicase domain mutations cannot support NER. Furthermore, we show that introducing an ERCC2 mutation into a bladder cancer cell line abrogates NER activity and is sufficient to drive cisplatin sensitivity in an orthotopic xenograft model. Conclusions: Our data support a direct role for ERCC2 mutations in driving cisplatin response, define the functional landscape of ERCC2 mutations in bladder cancer, and provide an opportunity to apply combined genomic and functional approaches to prospectively guide therapy decisions in bladder cancer. See related commentary by Grivas, p. 907

[1]  M. Berger,et al.  Alterations in DNA Damage Response and Repair Genes as Potential Marker of Clinical Benefit From PD-1/PD-L1 Blockade in Advanced Urothelial Cancers. , 2018, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  E. Plimack,et al.  A phase II trial of risk-adapted treatment for muscle invasive bladder cancer after neoadjuvant accelerated MVAC. , 2018 .

[3]  E. Schadt,et al.  Phase 2 Trial of Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, plus Ipilimumab in Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Cancer and Impact of DNA Damage Response Gene Mutations on Outcomes. , 2017, European urology.

[4]  N. Socci,et al.  Accelerating Discovery of Functional Mutant Alleles in Cancer. , 2018, Cancer discovery.

[5]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive Molecular Characterization of Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer , 2017, Cell.

[6]  A. Niemierko,et al.  Long-term Outcomes After Bladder-preserving Tri-modality Therapy for Patients with Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: An Updated Analysis of the Massachusetts General Hospital Experience. , 2017, European urology.

[7]  Moriah H Nissan,et al.  OncoKB: A Precision Oncology Knowledge Base. , 2017, JCO precision oncology.

[8]  Donavan T. Cheng,et al.  Mutational Landscape of Metastatic Cancer Revealed from Prospective Clinical Sequencing of 10,000 Patients , 2017, Nature Medicine.

[9]  M. Berger,et al.  DNA Damage Response and Repair Gene Alterations Are Associated with Improved Survival in Patients with Platinum-Treated Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma , 2017, Clinical Cancer Research.

[10]  L. Garraway,et al.  Clinical Validation of Chemotherapy Response Biomarker ERCC2 in Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Bladder Carcinoma. , 2016, JAMA oncology.

[11]  M. O’Connor,et al.  Targeting the DNA Damage Response in Cancer. , 2015, Molecular cell.

[12]  Robert T. Jones,et al.  Genomic Characterization of Brain Metastases Reveals Branched Evolution and Potential Therapeutic Targets. , 2015, Cancer discovery.

[13]  B. Vogelstein,et al.  PD-1 blockade in tumors with mismatch repair deficiency. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  R. Mak,et al.  Long-term outcomes in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer after selective bladder-preserving combined-modality therapy: a pooled analysis of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group protocols 8802, 8903, 9506, 9706, 9906, and 0233. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  S. Gabriel,et al.  Somatic ERCC2 mutations correlate with cisplatin sensitivity in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma. , 2014, Cancer discovery.

[16]  Nicholas D James,et al.  Critical analysis of bladder sparing with trimodal therapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review. , 2014, European urology.

[17]  Neville E. Sanjana,et al.  Improved vectors and genome-wide libraries for CRISPR screening , 2014, Nature Methods.

[18]  J. Hoeijmakers,et al.  Understanding nucleotide excision repair and its roles in cancer and ageing , 2014, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[19]  F. Couch,et al.  Functional Assays for Analysis of Variants of Uncertain Significance in BRCA2 , 2014, Human mutation.

[20]  Mathew R Schnorenberg,et al.  Monitoring Repair of UV-Induced 6-4-Photoproducts with a Purified DDB2 Protein Complex , 2014, PloS one.

[21]  Dennis C. Friedrich,et al.  Whole-exome sequencing and clinical interpretation of formalin-fixed , paraffin-embedded tumor samples to guide precision cancer medicine , 2014 .

[22]  The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network,et al.  Comprehensive molecular characterization of urothelial bladder carcinoma , 2014, Nature.

[23]  E. Lander,et al.  Lessons from the Cancer Genome , 2013, Cell.

[24]  J. Egly,et al.  ARCH domain of XPD, an anchoring platform for CAK that conditions TFIIH DNA repair and transcription activities , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  A. McKenna,et al.  Absolute quantification of somatic DNA alterations in human cancer , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[26]  L. Galluzzi,et al.  Molecular mechanisms of cisplatin resistance , 2012, Oncogene.

[27]  S. Ramsey,et al.  Patterns of use of systemic chemotherapy for Medicare beneficiaries with urothelial bladder cancer. , 2011, Urologic oncology.

[28]  J. Egly,et al.  Both XPD alleles contribute to the phenotype of compound heterozygote xeroderma pigmentosum patients , 2009, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[29]  H. Grossman,et al.  Quality of pathologic response and surgery correlate with survival for patients with completely resected bladder cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2009, Cancer.

[30]  Nicholas J Vogelzang,et al.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus cystectomy compared with cystectomy alone for locally advanced bladder cancer. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  R. Blasberg,et al.  Cytoplasmically retargeted HSV1-tk/GFP reporter gene mutants for optimization of noninvasive molecular-genetic imaging. , 2003, Neoplasia.

[32]  R. Parshad,et al.  XPD polymorphisms: effects on DNA repair proficiency. , 2000, Carcinogenesis.

[33]  S. Lerner Neoadjuvant cisplatin, methotrexate, and vinblastine chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a randomised controlled trial. International collaboration of trialists. , 1999, Lancet.

[34]  T. Nishi,et al.  Autocrine Growth of Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Bladder Induced by Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor 1 , 2006 .