Facing the Truth or Living a Lie: Conformity, Radicalism and Activism

People who speak up about the unpleasant realities of environmental degradation, capitalist exploitation and the growth economy are likely to be criticised for 'negative framing' - while corporations undermine truths by casting them as social constructs with no objective validity. Environmentalists increasingly conform to the idea of telling nice stories using abstract metaphors rather than seeking to identify, specify and name systemic problems and their causes. Psychological pressures faced by scientists and activists, and personal strategies for coming to terms with and combating harsh realities, are themes that run through this issue of Environmental Values. This reveals the necessity of radical activism and the expression of a more general concern over ethics and justice as counters to the stiflingly narrow hegemonic economic discourse that prevails in official circles.

[1]  C. Spash.  This Changes Nothing: The Paris Agreement to Ignore Reality , 2016, Green Planet Blues.

[2]  D. Fuchs,et al.  Green Faith? The Role of Faith-Based Actors in Global Sustainable Development Discourse , 2018, Environmental Values.

[3]  P. Hoggett,et al.  Engaging with Climate Change: Comparing the Cultures of Science and Activism , 2018, Studies in the Psychosocial.

[4]  M. Schmelzer,et al.  The Degrowth Spectrum: Convergence and Divergence within a Diverse and Conflictual Alliance , 2018, Environmental Values.

[5]  I. Konik.  Ubuntu and Ecofeminism: Value-Building with African and Womanist Voices , 2018, Environmental Values.

[6]  N. Droste,et al.  The Green Economy: Pragmatism or Revolution? Perceptions of Young Researchers on Social Ecological Transformation , 2017 .

[7]  N. Pidgeon,et al.  Invested in Unsustainability? On the Psychosocial Patterning of Engagement in Practices , 2016 .

[8]  C. Carter.  Denial and Despair , 2015 .

[9]  C. Spash.  Better Growth, Helping the Paris COP-out?Fallacies and Omissions of the New ClimateEconomy Report , 2014 .

[10]  C. Spash.  The Politics of Researching Carbon Trading in Australia , 2014 .

[11]  C. Spash.  Green Economy, Red Herring , 2012 .

[12]  R. Robins.  The Controversy over GM Canola in Australia as an Ontological Politics , 2012 .

[13]  D. Lindenmayer.  Merchants of Doubt. How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming , 2012 .

[14]  B. Nerlich.  ‘Climategate’: Paradoxical Metaphors and Political Paralysis , 2010 .

[15]  C. Spash.  Censoring Science in Research Officially , 2010 .

[16]  Peter Jacques,et al.  The organisation of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism , 2008 .

[17]  David Michaels,et al.  Doubt is their product. , 2005, Scientific American.

[18]  D. Sarewitz.  How science makes environmental controversies worse , 2004 .

[19]  C. Spash.  Greenhouse Economics: Value and Ethics , 2002 .

[20]  Wolfgang Lutz,et al.  The Kyoto Protocol: A Guide and Assessment , 1999 .

[21]  Jon Turney,et al.  Frankenstein's Footsteps: Science, Genetics and Popular Culture , 1998 .

[22]  L. J. Carter.  Nuclear Imperatives and Public Trust: Dealing with Radioactive Waste , 1987 .