Every End Is a New Beginning—a Realignment and Relaunch of an Environmental Management System at a German University Following a 15 Years Maintaining Period

As the first Higher Education Institution (HEI) in Europe the University of Applied Sciences Zittau/Goerlitz implemented an Environmental Management System (EMS) according to EMAS (EMAS III 2009) already in 1999 and still is anxious to maintain, audit and improve this successful system on a high level. As most parts of this EMS are designed following Deming’s PDCA cycle, the EMS aims at continuous improvement of performance. After such a long period the university’s EMS reached a high degree of maturity. Recently, however, it seems that the envisaged continuous improvement process (CIP) has yet lost its dynamics. Obviously, there is still a lot of creativity how to improve the environmental performance. But dedication and motivation of both staff and students is slowly declining and low-hanging fruits, i.e. measurements that are cost-effective in the short term, have already been picked. On the other side, new challenges occur for HEI i.e. aspects of energy efficiency, occupational health and safety and sustainability which require a re-launch of the existing university’s environmental management concerning the strategic focus and including improved processes specifically tailored to the needs of an academic institution. The paper presents a conceptual model of a new EMS for Institutions of Higher Education with a core alignment on strengthening and promoting initiatives of students, staff and stakeholders and on supporting small-scale but effective projects at a more operational level.

[1]  F. J. Lozano,et al.  Advancing Higher Education for Sustainable Development: international insights and critical reflections , 2013 .

[2]  Martin A.C. Brouwer,et al.  The soul of the machine: continual improvement in ISO 14001 , 2008 .

[3]  Arjen E. J. Wals,et al.  Shaping the Education of Tomorrow: 2012 Full-length Report on the UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development , 2012 .

[4]  S. Caeiro,et al.  Sustainability Science and Education for Sustainable Development in Universities: A Way for Transition , 2013 .

[5]  Walter Leal Filho,et al.  About the Role of Universities and Their Contribution to Sustainable Development , 2011 .

[6]  Bernd Delakowitz,et al.  The Hochschule Zittau/Görlitz , 2000 .

[7]  Barcelona Guni,et al.  Higher Education’s Commitment to Sustainability: From Understanding to Action , 2012 .

[8]  Andreas Acker Hendrik Hermann Regelungen der Bundesländer auf dem Gebiet der umweltfreundlichen Beschaffung , 2011 .

[9]  W. Edwards Deming,et al.  Out of the Crisis , 1982 .

[10]  Edeltraud Günther,et al.  Checklisten für die Durchführung der Umweltprüfung/Umweltbetriebsprüfung an Hochschulen im Rahmen der Einführung von Umweltmanagementsystemen. - 2003 , 2003 .

[11]  Tarah Wright,et al.  Higher Education for Sustainability , 2007 .

[12]  Daniella Tilbury,et al.  Tracking Our Progress , 2009 .

[13]  Walter Leal Filho,et al.  Sustainable Development at Universities: New Horizons , 2013 .

[14]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[15]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Alignment: Using the Balanced Scorecard to Create Corporate Synergies , 2006 .

[16]  N. Nayab Kaizen: The key to Japan‚s competitive success , 2009 .

[17]  Tim C. McAloone,et al.  Ecodesign maturity model: a management framework to support ecodesign implementation into manufacturing companies , 2013 .

[18]  A. Wals Sustainability in higher education in the context of the UN DESD: a review of learning and institutionalization processes , 2014 .

[19]  Karel Mulder,et al.  Don't Preach. Practice! Value Laden Statements in Academic Sustainability Education. , 2010 .