Managing with Style: The Effect of Managers on Firm Policies

This paper investigates whether and how individual managers affect corporate behavior and performance. We construct a manager-firm matched panel data set which enables us to track the top managers across different firms over time. We find that manager fixed effects matter for a wide range of corporate decisions. A significant extent of the heterogeneity in investment, financial and organizational practices of firms can be explained by the presence of manager fixed effects. We identify specific patterns in managerial decision making that appear to indicate general differences in "style" across managers. Moreover, we show that management style is significantly related to manager fixed effects in performance and that managers with higher performance fixed effects receive higher compensation and are more likely to be found in better governed firms. In a final step, we tie back these findings to observable managerial characteristics. We find that executives from earlier birth cohorts appear on average to be more conservative; on the other hand, managers who hold an MBA degree seem to follow on average more aggressive strategies.

[1]  Ulrike Malmendier,et al.  Who Makes Acquisitions? CEO Overconfidence and the Market's Reaction , 2003 .

[2]  Ulrike Malmendier,et al.  CEO Overconfidence and Corporate Investment , 2002 .

[3]  E. Steen,et al.  Organizational Beliefs and Managerial Vision , 2005 .

[4]  G. Phillips,et al.  Is There an Optimal Industry Financial Structure? , 2002 .

[5]  Noam Wasserman,et al.  When Does Leadership Matter? The Contingent Opportunities View of CEO Leadership , 2001 .

[6]  Phanish Puranam,et al.  CEO Leadership and Organizational Performance: The Moderating Effect of Environmental Uncertainty , 2001 .

[7]  G. Phillips,et al.  Is There an Optimal Industry Capital Structure ? , 2001 .

[8]  Julio J. Rotemberg,et al.  Visionaries, Managers, and Strategic Direction , 2000 .

[9]  Campbell R. Harvey,et al.  The Theory and Practice of Corporate Finance: Evidence from the Field , 1999 .

[10]  R. Parrino,et al.  CEO turnover and outside succession A cross-sectional analysis , 1997 .

[11]  S. Kaplan,et al.  Do Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities Provide Useful Measures of Financing Constraints? , 1997 .

[12]  Glenn Ellison,et al.  Are some mutual fund managers better than others , 1999 .

[13]  Benjamin E. Hermalin,et al.  Endogenously Chosen Boards of Directors and Their Monitoring of the CEO , 1998 .

[14]  Glenn Ellison,et al.  Are Some Mutual Funds Managers Better than Others? Cross-Sectional Patterns in Behavior and Performance , 1996 .

[15]  Andrea Shepard,et al.  Firm Diversification and CEO Compensation: Managerial Ability or Executive Entrenchment? , 1994 .

[16]  Ross L. Watts,et al.  The Investment Opportunity Set and Corporate Financing, Dividend, and Compensation Policies , 1992 .

[17]  Y A Ozcan,et al.  Determinants of capital structure. , 1992, Hospital & health services administration.

[18]  M. Lieberman,et al.  Firm-Level Productivity and Management Influence: A Comparison of U.S. and Japanese Automobile Producers , 1990 .

[19]  Neil Fligstein,et al.  FROM THE TRANSFORMATION OF CORPORATE CONTROL , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[20]  Jerold B. Warner,et al.  Stock prices and top management changes , 1988 .

[21]  Steven M. Fazzari,et al.  Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment , 1987 .

[22]  W. Mikkelson On the Existence of an Optimal Capital Structure: Theory and Evidence: Discussion , 1984 .

[23]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers , 1984 .