Mobility of cytoplasmic, membrane, and DNA-binding proteins in Escherichia coli.

Protein mobility affects most cellular processes, such as the rates of enzymatic reactions, signal transduction, and assembly of macromolecular complexes. Despite such importance, little systematic information is available about protein diffusion inside bacterial cells. Here we combined fluorescence recovery after photobleaching with numerical modeling to analyze mobility of a set of fluorescent protein fusions in the bacterial cytoplasm, the plasma membrane, and in the nucleoid. Estimated diffusion coefficients of cytoplasmic and membrane proteins show steep dependence on the size and on the number of transmembrane helices, respectively. Protein diffusion in both compartments is thus apparently obstructed by a network of obstacles, creating the so-called molecular sieving effect. These obstructing networks themselves, however, appear to be dynamic and allow a slow and nearly size-independent movement of large proteins and complexes. The obtained dependencies of protein mobility on the molecular mass and the number of transmembrane helices can be used as a reference to predict diffusion rates of proteins in Escherichia coli. Mobility of DNA-binding proteins apparently mainly depends on their binding specificity, with FRAP recovery kinetics being slower for the highly specific TetR repressor than for the relatively nonspecific H-NS regulator.

[1]  Sung-Hou Kim,et al.  Four-helical-bundle structure of the cytoplasmic domain of a serine chemotaxis receptor , 1999, Nature.

[2]  Mark C Leake,et al.  Clustering and dynamics of cytochrome bd‐I complexes in the Escherichia coli plasma membrane in vivo , 2008, Molecular microbiology.

[3]  S. Leibler,et al.  An ultrasensitive bacterial motor revealed by monitoring signaling proteins in single cells. , 2000, Science.

[4]  Colin Robinson,et al.  Diffusion of Green Fluorescent Protein in Three Cell Environments in Escherichia Coli , 2006, Journal of bacteriology.

[5]  M. Elowitz,et al.  Protein Mobility in the Cytoplasm ofEscherichia coli , 1999, Journal of bacteriology.

[6]  W. Webb,et al.  Mobility measurement by analysis of fluorescence photobleaching recovery kinetics. , 1976, Biophysical journal.

[7]  A. Verkman Solute and macromolecule diffusion in cellular aqueous compartments. , 2002, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[8]  A. Verkman,et al.  Photobleaching recovery and anisotropy decay of green fluorescent protein GFP-S65T in solution and cells: cytoplasmic viscosity probed by green fluorescent protein translational and rotational diffusion. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[9]  R. S. Hodges,et al.  Lateral mobility of proteins in liquid membranes revisited , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  T. Brubaker,et al.  Nonlinear Parameter Estimation , 1979 .

[11]  E. Amann,et al.  Tightly regulated tac promoter vectors useful for the expression of unfused and fused proteins in Escherichia coli. , 1988, Gene.

[12]  Irina A. Shkel,et al.  Crowding and Confinement Effects on Protein Diffusion In Vivo , 2006, Journal of bacteriology.

[13]  J. Elf,et al.  Probing Transcription Factor Dynamics at the Single-Molecule Level in a Living Cell , 2007, Science.

[14]  Johannes P. Schlöder,et al.  On the Role of Natural Level Functions to Achieve Global Convergence for Damped Newton Methods , 1999, System Modelling and Optimization.

[15]  D. Ingber,et al.  Methods for measuring rates of protein binding to insoluble scaffolds in living cells: Histone H1‐chromatin interactions , 2006, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[16]  Corentin Spriet,et al.  Concurrent Fast and Slow Cycling of a Transcriptional Activator at an Endogenous Promoter , 2008, Science.

[17]  K. Luby-Phelps,et al.  Cytoarchitecture and physical properties of cytoplasm: volume, viscosity, diffusion, intracellular surface area. , 2000, International review of cytology.

[18]  J. Haseloff,et al.  Molecular Characterization of Recombinant Green Fluorescent Protein by Fluorescence Correlation Microscopy , 1995 .

[19]  P. Saffman,et al.  Brownian motion in biological membranes. , 1975, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  J. Pogliano The bacterial cytoskeleton. , 2008, Current opinion in cell biology.

[21]  Irina A. Shkel,et al.  Cytoplasmic Protein Mobility in Osmotically Stressed Escherichia coli , 2008, Journal of bacteriology.

[22]  Sebastian Thiem,et al.  Protein exchange dynamics at chemoreceptor clusters in Escherichia coli , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  H. Ingmer,et al.  H‐NS: a modulator of environmentally regulated gene expression , 1997, Molecular microbiology.

[24]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Collaborative signaling by mixed chemoreceptor teams in Escherichia coli , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  S. Kojima,et al.  Visualization of functional rotor proteins of the bacterial flagellar motor in the cell membrane. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[26]  Sebastian Thiem,et al.  Positioning of chemosensory clusters in E. coli and its relation to cell division , 2007, The EMBO journal.

[27]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Isolation and behavior of Escherichia coli deletion mutants lacking chemotaxis functions , 1982, Journal of bacteriology.

[28]  M. Fukushima,et al.  Levenberg–Marquardt methods with strong local convergence properties for solving nonlinear equations with convex constraints , 2004 .

[29]  R. Berry,et al.  Variable stoichiometry of the TatA component of the twin-arginine protein transport system observed by in vivo single-molecule imaging , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.