Current status of CT colonography.

[1]  C. Johnson,et al.  Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema examination: prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences. , 2003, Radiology.

[2]  C. Sugawa,et al.  Endoscopic complications. Results of the 1974 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Survey. , 1976, JAMA.

[3]  L. Melton,et al.  A prospective, controlled assessment of factors influencing acceptance of screening colonoscopy , 2002, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[4]  Maryellen L. Giger,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging : proceedings of the First International Workshop on Computer-Aided Diagnosis, Chicago, U.S.A., 20-23 September 1998 , 1999 .

[5]  D. Ransohoff CON: Immediate Colonoscopy Is Not Necessary in Patients Who Have Polyps Smaller Than 1 cm on Computed Tomographic Colonography , 2005, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[6]  C. Catalano,et al.  Colorectal polyps: detection with low-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography versus two sequential colonoscopies. , 2005, Radiology.

[7]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis in virtual colonography via combination of surface normal and sphere fitting methods , 2002, European Radiology.

[8]  E T Stewart,et al.  A comparison of colonoscopy and double-contrast barium enema for surveillance after polypectomy. National Polyp Study Work Group. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  C. Johnson,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of double-contrast barium enema in screening for colorectal cancer. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  M. Macari,et al.  Significance of missed polyps at CT colonography. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  Carlo Catalano,et al.  Detection of colorectal lesions with virtual computed tomographic colonography. , 2002, American journal of surgery.

[12]  D. Lieberman,et al.  Procedural success and complications of large-scale screening colonoscopy. , 2002, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[13]  John A. Evans,et al.  Complications of Colonoscopy , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[14]  P. Pickhardt,et al.  Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  Magnus Båth,et al.  Priorities in optimisation of medical X-ray imaging--a contribution to the debate. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[16]  E. Neri,et al.  Colorectal cancer: role of CT colonography in preoperative evaluation after incomplete colonoscopy. , 2002, Radiology.

[17]  G. Galatola,et al.  CT colonography: screening in individuals at high risk for colorectal cancer , 2006, Abdominal Imaging.

[18]  A. Dhar,et al.  National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence , 2005 .

[19]  R. Jeffrey,et al.  Computed Tomography Colonography: Feasibility of Computer-Aided Polyp Detection in a “First Reader” Paradigm , 2004, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[20]  G. Bonsel,et al.  CT colonography and colonoscopy: assessment of patient preference in a 5-week follow-up study. , 2004, Radiology.

[21]  T. Eide,et al.  Natural history of adenomas , 2005, World Journal of Surgery.

[22]  E G McFarland,et al.  Influence of image acquisition parameters on CT artifacts and polyp depiction in spiral CT colonography: in vitro evaluation. , 2000, Radiology.

[23]  A. Aldridge,et al.  Histological assessment of colorectal adenomas by size. Are polyps less than 10 mm in size clinically important? , 2001, The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica.

[24]  R. Heigh,et al.  Accuracy of assessment of the extent of examination by experienced colonoscopists. , 1992, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[25]  J. Jackson,et al.  Meta-Analysis: Computed Tomographic Colonography , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[26]  Hao Wang,et al.  CT colonography data interpretation: effect of different section thicknesses--preliminary observations. , 2003, Radiology.

[27]  M. Macari CT colonography: the real deal , 2005, Abdominal Imaging.

[28]  T. Fujii,et al.  Flat and depressed colonic neoplasms: a prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies in the UK , 2000, The Lancet.

[29]  Perry J Pickhardt,et al.  Patient-controlled room air insufflation versus automated carbon dioxide delivery for CT colonography. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[30]  J. Ferrucci,et al.  A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  D. Rex,et al.  Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. , 1997, Gastroenterology.

[32]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[33]  A. Hara,et al.  Incidental extracolonic findings at CT colonography. , 2000, Radiology.

[34]  Jin Ho Kim,et al.  Flat polyps of the colon: detection with 16-MDCT colonography--preliminary results. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[35]  E. Svensson,et al.  Patient acceptance of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: prospective comparative study in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease. , 2002, Radiology.

[36]  Greg M Galdino,et al.  Extracolonic abnormalities discovered incidentally at CT colonography in a male population. , 2005, Radiology.

[37]  A. Zauber,et al.  Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. , 1993 .

[38]  L. Kreel,et al.  The value of CT in malignant colonic tumors. , 1980, The Journal of computed tomography.

[39]  J. Waye,et al.  Complications of colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy. , 1996, Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America.

[40]  J F Debatin,et al.  Colonic masses: detection with MR colonography. , 2000, Radiology.

[41]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Computer Aided Detection for Low-Dose CT Colonography , 2005, MICCAI.

[42]  M. Macari,et al.  Effect of different bowel preparations on residual fluid at CT colonography. , 2001, Radiology.

[43]  Corinne A Tipker,et al.  CT colonography at different radiation dose levels: feasibility of dose reduction. , 2002, Radiology.

[44]  Ronald M. Summers,et al.  Teniae coli guided navigation and registration for virtual colonoscopy , 2005, VIS 05. IEEE Visualization, 2005..

[45]  C. G. Coin,et al.  Computerized radiology of the colon: a potential screening technique. , 1983, Computerized radiology : official journal of the Computerized Tomography Society.

[46]  Stuart A. Taylor,et al.  Multi-detector row CT colonography: effect of collimation, pitch, and orientation on polyp detection in a human colectomy specimen. , 2003, Radiology.

[47]  Abraham H. Dachman,et al.  Atlas of Virtual Colonoscopy , 2003, Springer New York.

[48]  C H McCollough,et al.  Detection of colorectal polyps by computed tomographic colography: feasibility of a novel technique. , 1996, Gastroenterology.

[49]  R. Summers,et al.  Oral Contrast Adherence to Polyps on CT Colonography , 2006, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[50]  Steve Halligan,et al.  Potentially serious adverse events at CT colonography in symptomatic patients: national survey of the United Kingdom. , 2006, Radiology.

[51]  R. Jeffrey,et al.  Automated polyp detector for CT colonography: feasibility study. , 2000, Radiology.

[52]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  Effective radiation doses in CT colonography: results of an inventory among research institutions , 2006, European Radiology.

[53]  C. Johnson,et al.  Extracolonic findings at CT colonography: evaluation of prevalence and cost in a screening population. , 2003, Gastroenterology.

[54]  Mark A Espeland,et al.  Virtual colonoscopy using oral contrast compared with colonoscopy for the detection of patients with colorectal polyps. , 2003, Gastroenterology.

[55]  M. Hellström,et al.  Extracolonic and incidental findings on CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy). , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[56]  L. Bonomo,et al.  Preoperative T and N staging of colorectal cancer: accuracy of contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT colonography--initial experience. , 2004, Radiology.

[57]  R. Jeffrey,et al.  CT colonography: influence of 3D viewing and polyp candidate features on interpretation with computer-aided detection. , 2006, Radiology.

[58]  L. Weinstock,et al.  Patient Preferences for CT Colonography, Conventional Colonoscopy, and Bowel Preparation , 2003, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[59]  Benjamin Littenberg,et al.  CT colonography: multiobserver diagnostic performance. , 2002, Radiology.

[60]  D. Nelson,et al.  Colonoscopy and polypectomy. , 2002, Hematology/oncology clinics of North America.

[61]  G. Spinzi,et al.  A comparison of colonoscopy and double-contrast barium enema for surveillance after polypectomy. , 2001, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[62]  S. Bremmer,et al.  Polyp detection with MDCT: a phantom-based evaluation of the impact of dose and spatial resolution. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[63]  M. Prokop Cancer screening with CT: dose controversy , 2005, European radiology.

[64]  Carlo Catalano,et al.  Feasibility of ultra-low-dose multislice CT colonography for the detection of colorectal lesions: preliminary experience , 2003, European Radiology.

[65]  J G Fletcher,et al.  CT colonography without cathartic preparation: feasibility study. , 2001, Radiology.

[66]  Perry J Pickhardt,et al.  Flat colorectal lesions in asymptomatic adults: implications for screening with CT virtual colonoscopy. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[67]  Carlo Catalano,et al.  Computed tomographic colonography without cathartic preparation for the detection of colorectal polyps. , 2004, Gastroenterology.

[68]  L. Påhlman,et al.  Patient factors influencing the completion rate in colonoscopy. , 2005, Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver.

[69]  J. Bond,et al.  Clinical evidence for the adenoma-carcinoma sequence, and the management of patients with colorectal adenomas. , 2000, Seminars in gastrointestinal disease.

[70]  Marc Baekelandt,et al.  Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results polyp detection and patient acceptance. , 2002, Radiology.

[71]  Karl Ludwig,et al.  CT colonography: Protocol optimization with multi-detector row CT--study in an anthropomorphic colon phantom. , 2003, Radiology.

[72]  S. Rankin,et al.  A comparison of air, CO2 and an air/CO2 mixture as insufflation agents for double contrast barium enema* , 1998, European Radiology.

[73]  J. Yee,et al.  CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. , 2005, Radiology.

[74]  D. Rex PRO: Patients with Polyps Smaller Than 1 cm on Computed Tomographic Colonography Should Be Offered Colonoscopy and Polypectomy , 2005, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[75]  Ronald M. Summers,et al.  Future Directions: Computer-Aided Diagnosis , 2005 .

[76]  Judy Yee,et al.  Comparison of supine and prone scanning separately and in combination at CT colonography. , 2003, Radiology.

[77]  S D Wall,et al.  Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. , 2001, Radiology.

[78]  A. Hara,et al.  Detection of flat lesions in the colon with CT colonography , 2002, Abdominal Imaging.

[79]  A. Laghi,et al.  Experimental colonic phantom for the evaluation of the optimal scanning technique for CT colonography using a multidetector spiral CT equipment , 2003, European Radiology.

[80]  F. Gump,et al.  Complications of colotomy and polypectomy. , 1960, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.

[81]  Jacob Sosna,et al.  Colonic perforation at CT colonography: assessment of risk in a multicenter large cohort. , 2006, Radiology.

[82]  M. Macari,et al.  Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection. , 2002, Radiology.

[83]  D. Vining Virtual colonoscopy. , 1999, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[84]  Hiroyuki Yoshida,et al.  Region-based supine-prone correspondence for the reduction of false-positive CAD polyp candidates in CT colonography. , 2005, Academic radiology.

[85]  M. Macari,et al.  Pitfalls of using three-dimensional CT colonography with two-dimensional imaging correlation. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[86]  A. Laghi,et al.  Colorectal carcinoma: detection and staging with multislice CT (MSCT) colonography , 2004, Abdominal Imaging.

[87]  M. Zalis,et al.  An analysis of the potential impact of computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy) on colonoscopy demand. , 2004, Gastroenterology.

[88]  P. Pickhardt,et al.  Surface visualization at 3D endoluminal CT colonography: degree of coverage and implications for polyp detection. , 2006, Gastroenterology.

[89]  T. Muto,et al.  The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum , 1975, Cancer.

[90]  Perry J Pickhardt,et al.  Translucency rendering in 3D endoluminal CT colonography: a useful tool for increasing polyp specificity and decreasing interpretation time. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[91]  J. Husband,et al.  The use of computed tomography in recurrent rectal tumors. , 1980, Radiology.

[92]  J. Ferrucci,et al.  Occlusive colon carcinoma: virtual colonoscopy in the preoperative evaluation of the proximal colon. , 1999, Radiology.

[93]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2006 , 2006, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[94]  Peter Bauerfeind,et al.  Is virtual colonoscopy a cost-effective option to screen for colorectal cancer? , 1999, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[95]  G. Layer,et al.  Colorectal polyps: detection with dark-lumen MR colonography versus conventional colonoscopy. , 2006, Radiology.

[96]  C. Johnson,et al.  Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps. , 2003, Gastroenterology.

[97]  S. Laurberg,et al.  Colonoscopy and multidetector-array computed-tomographic colonography: detection rates and feasibility. , 2003, Endoscopy.

[98]  J. Burdick,et al.  Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. , 2004, JAMA.

[99]  I. Bitter,et al.  Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy computer-aided polyp detection in a screening population. , 2005, Gastroenterology.

[100]  T. Murakami,et al.  Assessment of two 3D MDCT colonography protocols for observation of colorectal polyps. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[101]  Hiroyuki Yoshida,et al.  Three-dimensional computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of colonic polyps , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[102]  E. Paulson,et al.  Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison , 2005, The Lancet.

[103]  Joel G Fletcher,et al.  Nonradiologists as second readers for intraluminal findings at CT colonography. , 2005, Academic radiology.

[104]  Perry Pickhardt,et al.  Location of Adenomas Missed by Optical Colonoscopy , 2004, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[105]  J G Fletcher,et al.  Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients. , 2000, Radiology.

[106]  Patrick M M Bossuyt,et al.  Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer. , 2004, Gastroenterology.

[107]  S. Goldberg,et al.  Endoluminal CT colonography after an incomplete endoscopic colonoscopy. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[108]  Arie E. Kaufman,et al.  Virtual colonoscopy , 2005, CACM.