Lipolysis Using a 980-nm Diode Laser: A Retrospective Analysis of 534 Procedures

BackgroundThe safety and efficacy of the 980-nm diode laser for laser lipolysis were evaluated in different body areas.MethodsFrom June 2005 to June 2007, 334 subjects underwent laser lipolysis. The treatment was performed using a 980-nm diode laser (OSYRIS, Hellemmes, France). After tumescent anesthesia, a 1-mm-diameter microcannula housing a 600-μm optical fiber was inserted into the subcutaneous fat. The cannula was moved back and forth in a predetermined manner to get a homogeneous distribution of energy at the treated area. Laser settings (power and cumulative energy) were selected in relation to individual body areas: 6 W (chin, arm, knee), 10 W (abdomen, back), and 15 W (thigh, hips, buttock). Patient satisfaction was evaluated and side effects were recorded. The laser energy counter incrementally counted the energy used; then the cumulative energy used for each treatment was recorded. Ultrasound imaging was used to control tumescent anesthesia infiltration, cannula position prior to laser emission,and postoperative fat liquefaction.ResultsFive hundred thirty-four (534) laser lipolysis procedures were performed on 334 patients. Different areas were treated: hips (197), inner thighs (86), abdomen (86), knees (61), flanks (57), buttocks (28), chin (22), arms (18), back (4). Mean cumulative energy was area–dependent, ranging from a minimum of 2200 J (knee) to a maximum of 51,000 J (abdomen). Contour correction and skin retraction were observed almost immediately in most patients. There was no scarring, infection, burns, hypopigmentation, bruising, swelling, or edema. Ecchymoses were observed in almost all patients but resolved in under 1 week for 322 patients. Patient satisfaction was very high. Because laser lipolysis is an outpatient procedure, patients were able to resume normal daily activities after 24 h. Ultrasound imaging confirmed that the thermal effect generated by the laser results in melting and rupture of the collagenous and subdermal bands.ConclusionThis clinical study demonstrates that the removal of small volumes of fat with concurrent subdermal tissue contraction can be performed safely and effectively using a 980-nm diode laser. Additional benefits include excellent patient tolerance and quick recovery time. This study also confirms that enough accumulated energy must be delivered to achieve sufficient lipolysis throughout different fat layers.

[1]  R. Geronemus,et al.  Laser Lipolysis Using a Novel 1,064 nm Nd: YAG Laser , 2006, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[2]  S. Mordon,et al.  “Histologic evaluation of interstitial lipolysis comparing a 1064, 1320 and 2100 nm laser in an ex vivo model” by Khoury JG, Saluja R, Keel D, Detwiler S, Goldman MP. Lasers Surg Med 2008 Jul 22;40(6):402–406 , 2008, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[3]  L. Noronha,et al.  Analysis of Laser Lipolysis Effects on Human Tissue Samples Obtained from Liposuction , 2005, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[4]  A. Goldman Submental Nd:Yag laser‐assisted liposuction , 2006, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[5]  Moriaki Wakaki,et al.  Histologic evaluation of the pulsed Nd:YAG laser for laser lipolysis , 2005, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[6]  Benjamin Wassmer,et al.  Mathematical modeling of laser lipolysis , 2008, Biomedical engineering online.

[7]  P. Andrades,et al.  A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Laser-Assisted Lipoplasty with Suction-Assisted Lipoplasty , 2006, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[8]  L. Canta,et al.  Laser Lipolysis: Flaccidity Under Control , 2002, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[9]  D. Apfelberg Results of multicenter study of laser-assisted liposuction. , 1996, Clinics in plastic surgery.

[10]  Mitchel P. Goldman,et al.  Histologic evaluation of interstitial lipolysis comparing a 1064, 1320 and 2100 nm laser in an ex vivo model , 2008, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[11]  Joseph P. Hunstad,et al.  Progress report on multicenter study of laser-assisted liposuction , 1995, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[12]  Apfelberg Db Results of multicenter study of laser-assisted liposuction. , 1996 .

[13]  Serge Mordon,et al.  Histologic evaluation of laser lipolysis: pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser versus cw 980-nm diode laser. , 2007, Aesthetic surgery journal.