Attributions of Personality Based on Physical Appearance, Speech, and Handwriting

The effect of facial appearance, speech style, and handwriting on personality attributions was examined. The source consistency hypothesis predicted that an actor will receive consistent attributions across all three types of information. The differential information hypothesis predicted that different personality dimensions are used to differentiate the actors within each type of information. In a 3 X 6 multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) design, each judge rated a single actor/information combination on scales of social evaluation, intellectual evaluation, activity, potency, emotionality, and sociability. Photographs of actors were differentiated primarily in terms of positive social and intellectual evaluation; the speech of actors was differentiated primarily along an activity dimension; and the writing of the actors was differentiated primarily along a potency dimension. This study supported the differential information hypothesis and suggested that these three types of information about an actor may lead judges to use different personality dimensions. Person perception studies have shown that observers readily make attributions about the personality traits, abilities, and emotions of other persons based on limited information. Three types of information have been extensively studied: facial appearance, expressive noncontent characteristics of speech (such as pitch, tone, and tempo), and handwriting. Numerous studies have reported that facial features and expression influence attributions about the attractiveness, pleasantness, intellectual and social skills, and mental health of the target person (Adams, 1977; Berscheid & Walster, 1974; Bull & Stevens, 1979; Dion, Ber

[1]  Hadley Cantril,et al.  Judging Personality from Voice , 1934 .

[2]  L. Cronbach Processes affecting scores on understanding of others and assumed similarity. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  C. Osgood,et al.  The Measurement of Meaning , 1958 .

[4]  E. Brunswik Perception and the Representative Design of Psychological Experiments , 1957 .

[5]  Calvin S. Hall,et al.  Theories of Personality , 1958 .

[6]  Gordon W. Allport,et al.  Pattern and growth in personality , 1961 .

[7]  Leonard S. Feldt,et al.  The use of extreme groups to test for the presence of a relationship , 1961 .

[8]  P F OSTWALD,et al.  ACOUSTIC METHODS IN PSYCHIATRY. , 1965, Scientific American.

[9]  A. Mehrabian,et al.  Inference of attitudes from nonverbal communication in two channels. , 1967, Journal of consulting psychology.

[10]  R. Exline,et al.  Visual interaction: The glances of power and preference. , 1971 .

[11]  K. Stevens,et al.  Emotions and speech: some acoustical correlates. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  K. Scherer Acoustic Concomitants of Emotional Dimensions: Judging Affect from Synthesized Tone Sequences. , 1972 .

[13]  E. Berscheid,et al.  What is beautiful is good. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  D. P. Hayes,et al.  Interpersonal judgments based on talkativeness: I. Fact or artifact? , 1972 .

[15]  K. Burns,et al.  Significance of vocal and visual channels in the decoding of emotional meaning. , 1973, The Journal of communication.

[16]  S. Weitz Nonverbal Communication: Readings With Commentary , 1974 .

[17]  A. C. Rencher,et al.  Fifty-four voices from two: the effects of simultaneous manipulations of rate, mean fundamental frequency, and variance of fundamental frequency on ratings of personality from speech. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  A. Buss,et al.  A Temperament Theory of Personality Development , 1975 .

[19]  S. J. Marwit,et al.  Comparison of multidimensional decoding of affect from audio, video and audiovideo recordings. , 1976, Sociometry.

[20]  D. Jorgenson Signature Size and Dominance: A Brief Note , 1977 .

[21]  Gerald R. Adams,et al.  Physical Attractiveness Research , 1977 .

[22]  R. Zweigenhaft The empirical study of signature size. , 1977 .

[23]  D. Krantz Nebraska symposium on motivation 1977. , 1977, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[24]  B. Depaulo,et al.  Decoding discrepant nonverbal cues. , 1978 .

[25]  Signature Size, Sex, and Status in Iran. , 1978, The Journal of social psychology.

[26]  W. H. Jones,et al.  Physical attractiveness and judgments of psychopathology. , 1978, The Journal of social psychology.

[27]  R. Bull,et al.  The effects of attractiveness of writer and penmanship on essay grades , 1979 .

[28]  R. Rosenthal Sensitivity to Nonverbal Communication: The PONS Test , 1979 .

[29]  K. Scherer,et al.  Social Markers in Speech , 1980 .

[30]  P. Ekman,et al.  Relative importance of face, body, and speech in judgments of personality and affect. , 1980 .

[31]  B. Gillen,et al.  Physical Attractiveness , 1981 .

[32]  J. Harvey Cognition, social behavior, and the environment , 1981 .

[33]  R. Krauss,et al.  Verbal, vocal, and visible factors in judgments of another's affect. , 1981 .

[34]  R. Helson Theories of Personality. 2nd ed. , 1982 .

[35]  R. Unger,et al.  Physical Attractiveness and Assumptions about Social Deviance , 1982 .

[36]  M. Zuckerman,et al.  Face and Tone of Voice in the Communication of Deception , 1982 .

[37]  Effects of Physical Attractiveness on Perception of Social Skill , 1982 .

[38]  J. A. Edinger,et al.  Nonverbal involvement and social control. , 1983 .