A computer simulation of the static magnetic field distribution in the human head

Distortion of the static magnetic field inside the human head is dependent on regional tissue susceptibility variations and geometrical shape. These effects result in resonance line broadening and frequency shifts and consequently, intensity and spatial errors in both magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy. To calculate the field distortion due to the susceptibility's geometry, two dimensional (2D) finite element analysis was applied to simulate the field distribution in a 2D model of the human head, placed in a uniform magnetic field. The model contains air‐filled cavities and sinuses, and the remainder is treated as water. The magnetic field deviation was evaluated using gray scale plots and histograms of the magnetic field. The shifts in parts/ million and broadening of the histograms correspond to the NMR of the sampled region. The field distribution of the human head was also experimentally mapped using the DANTE tagging sequence. The calculated and experimental field maps are in good agreement. Thus, geometric considerations with uniform susceptibilities are sufficient to explain most of the static magnetic field distribution in the human head.

[1]  T. Mosher,et al.  Mapping the static magnetic field using a double-DANTE tagging sequence , 1991 .

[2]  M A Moerland,et al.  Susceptibility artifacts in 2DFT spin-echo and gradient-echo imaging: the cylinder model revisited. , 1993, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[3]  C. Springer,et al.  Bulk magnetic susceptibility shifts in nmr studies of compartmentalized samples: use of paramagnetic reagents , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  T J Mosher,et al.  Magnetic susceptibility measurement using a double‐DANTE tagging (DDT) sequence , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  M. Moerland,et al.  Simulation of susceptibility artifacts in 2D and 3D Fourier transform spin-echo and gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging. , 1994, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[6]  M A Moerland,et al.  Numerical analysis of the magnetic field for arbitrary magnetic susceptibility distributions in 2D. , 1992, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[7]  J Hennig,et al.  RARE imaging: A fast imaging method for clinical MR , 1986, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  1H NMR spectroscopic imaging of the monkey brain using binomial water suppression in a stimulated‐echo sequence , 1991, NMR in biomedicine.

[9]  W. T. Dixon.  Simple proton spectroscopic imaging. , 1984, Radiology.

[10]  Z H Cho,et al.  Measurement of the magnetic susceptibility effect in high-field NMR imaging. , 1988, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  J Hennig.  Chemical shift imaging with phase‐encoding RF pulses , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  R. Turner,et al.  Functional mapping of the human visual cortex at 4 and 1.5 tesla using deoxygenation contrast EPI , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  F. Wehrli,et al.  Magnetic field distribution in models of trabecular bone , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  S. Posse,et al.  Susceptibility artifacts in spin-echo and gradient-echo imaging , 1990 .

[15]  G H Glover,et al.  Three‐point dixon technique for true water/fat decomposition with B0 inhomogeneity correction , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  G. Glover.  Multipoint dixon technique for water and fat proton and susceptibility imaging , 1991, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  P. Röschmann,et al.  Susceptibility artefacts in NMR imaging. , 1985, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[18]  E. Haacke,et al.  Theory of NMR signal behavior in magnetically inhomogeneous tissues: The static dephasing regime , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  J. Frahm,et al.  Localized proton NMR spectroscopy in different regions of the human brain in vivo. Relaxation times and concentrations of cerebral metabolites , 1989, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  David G. Gadian,et al.  The effect of magnetic susceptibility variations in NMR imaging and nmr spectroscopy in vivo , 1986 .

[21]  R. Bryan,et al.  MR imaging of susceptibility-induced magnetic field inhomogeneities. , 1988, Radiology.

[22]  J. Felmlee,et al.  Proton MR chemical shift imaging using double and triple phase contrast acquisition methods. , 1989, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[23]  J. Frahm,et al.  Direct FLASH MR imaging of magnetic field inhomogeneities by gradient compensation , 1988, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  S. Majumdar.  Quantitative study of the susceptibility difference between trabecular bone and bone marrow: Computer simulations , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  D W Kormos,et al.  Separation of true fat and water images by correcting magnetic field inhomogeneity in situ. , 1986, Radiology.

[26]  A Macovski,et al.  Inhomogeneity correction for in vivo spectroscopy by high‐resolution water referencing , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  M A Moerland,et al.  Numerical analysis of the magnetic field for arbitrary magnetic susceptibility distributions in 3D. , 1994, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[28]  T. Mosher,et al.  A DANTE tagging sequence for the evaluation of translational sample motion , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  G M Bydder,et al.  Clinical magnetic susceptibility mapping of the brain. , 1987, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[30]  Z. H. Cho,et al.  Chemical‐shift imaging with large magnetic field inhomogeneity , 1987, Magnetic resonance in medicine.