Short linear motif core and flanking regions modulate retinoblastoma protein binding affinity and specificity.

Pocket proteins retinoblastoma (pRb), p107 and p130 are negative regulators of cellular proliferation and multifunctional proteins regulating development, differentiation and chromatin structure. The retinoblastoma protein is a potent tumor suppressor mutated in a wide range of human cancers, and oncogenic viruses often interfere with cell cycle regulation by inactivating pRb. The LxCxE and pRb AB groove short linear motifs (SLiMs) are key to many pocket protein mediated interactions including host and viral partners. A review of available experimental evidence reveals that several core residues composing each motif instance are determinants for binding. In the LxCxE motif, a fourth hydrophobic position that might allow variable spacing is required for binding. In both motifs, flanking regions including charged stretches and phosphorylation sites can fine-tune the binding affinity and specificity of pocket protein SLiM-mediated interactions. Flanking regions can modulate pocket protein binding specificity, or tune the high affinity interactions of viral proteins that hijack the pRb network. The location of SLiMs within intrinsically disordered regions allows faster evolutionary rates that enable viruses to acquire a functional variant of the core motif by convergent evolution, and subsequently test numerous combinations of flanking regions towards maximizing interaction specificity and affinity. This knowledge can guide future efforts directed at the design of peptide-based compounds that can target pocket proteins to regulate the G1/S cell cycle checkpoint or impair viral mediated pRb inactivation.

[1]  Nicolas E. Buchler,et al.  Conservation and divergence of C-terminal domain structure in the retinoblastoma protein family , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  F. Dick,et al.  Structural Conservation and E2F Binding Specificity within the Retinoblastoma Pocket Protein Family. , 2016, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  N. Dyson RB1: a prototype tumor suppressor and an enigma , 2016, Genes & development.

[4]  S. Michnick,et al.  Evolution of domain–peptide interactions to coadapt specificity and affinity to functional diversity , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  S. Haferkamp,et al.  Serine 220 phosphorylation of the Merkel cell polyomavirus large T antigen crucially supports growth of Merkel cell carcinoma cells , 2016, International journal of cancer.

[6]  Toby J. Gibson,et al.  ELM 2016—data update and new functionality of the eukaryotic linear motif resource , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[7]  Alan M. Moses,et al.  Short linear motifs – ex nihilo evolution of protein regulation , 2015, Cell Communication and Signaling.

[8]  I. E. Sánchez,et al.  Convergent evolution and mimicry of protein linear motifs in host-pathogen interactions. , 2015, Current opinion in structural biology.

[9]  L. Litovchick,et al.  Structural mechanisms of DREAM complex assembly and regulation , 2015, Genes & development.

[10]  J. Ross,et al.  Structural and functional characterization of the acidic region from the RIZ tumor suppressor. , 2015, Biochemistry.

[11]  O. Fedorov,et al.  Lysine methylation-dependent binding of 53BP1 to the pRb tumor suppressor , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  M. Madan Babu,et al.  A million peptide motifs for the molecular biologist. , 2014, Molecular cell.

[13]  Aidan Budd,et al.  Short linear motifs: ubiquitous and functionally diverse protein interaction modules directing cell regulation. , 2014, Chemical reviews.

[14]  T. Dobner,et al.  High-Affinity Rb Binding, p53 Inhibition, Subcellular Localization, and Transformation by Wild-Type or Tumor-Derived Shortened Merkel Cell Polyomavirus Large T Antigens , 2013, Journal of Virology.

[15]  Frederick A. Dick,et al.  Molecular mechanisms underlying RB protein function , 2013, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[16]  Lucía B. Chemes,et al.  Sequence Evolution of the Intrinsically Disordered and Globular Domains of a Model Viral Oncoprotein , 2012, PloS one.

[17]  I. E. Sánchez,et al.  Evolution of linear motifs within the papillomavirus E7 oncoprotein. , 2012, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  Katja Luck,et al.  The emerging contribution of sequence context to the specificity of protein interactions mediated by PDZ domains , 2012, FEBS letters.

[19]  Joan Teyra,et al.  Elucidation of the binding preferences of peptide recognition modules: SH3 and PDZ domains , 2012, FEBS letters.

[20]  Greg L. Hura,et al.  Structures of inactive retinoblastoma protein reveal multiple mechanisms for cell cycle control. , 2012, Genes & development.

[21]  A. Davidson,et al.  Distinct Peptide Binding Specificities of Src Homology 3 (SH3) Protein Domains Can Be Determined by Modulation of Local Energetics across the Binding Interface* , 2012, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[22]  Zohar Itzhaki,et al.  A Dynamic View of Domain-Motif Interactions , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[23]  Norman E. Davey,et al.  Attributes of short linear motifs. , 2012, Molecular bioSystems.

[24]  I. E. Sánchez,et al.  Kinetic recognition of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor by a specific protein target. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  T. Sixma,et al.  Ubiquitin-specific protease 4 is inhibited by its ubiquitin-like domain , 2011, EMBO reports.

[26]  Norman E. Davey,et al.  How viruses hijack cell regulation. , 2011, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[27]  Young Sun,et al.  p38 phosphorylates Rb on Ser567 by a novel, cell cycle-independent mechanism that triggers Rb-Hdm2 interaction and apoptosis , 2010, Oncogene.

[28]  Shili Duan,et al.  Recognition and Specificity Determinants of the Human Cbx Chromodomains* , 2010, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[29]  F. Dick,et al.  An Overlapping Kinase and Phosphatase Docking Site Regulates Activity of the Retinoblastoma Protein , 2010, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[30]  Brett W. Engelmann,et al.  SH2 Domains Recognize Contextual Peptide Sequence Information to Determine Selectivity* , 2010, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[31]  L. Aravind,et al.  Diversity and evolution of chromatin proteins encoded by DNA viruses. , 2010, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[32]  Lucía B. Chemes,et al.  Targeting mechanism of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor by a prototypical viral oncoprotein , 2010, The FEBS journal.

[33]  Toby J. Gibson,et al.  Evidence for the Concerted Evolution between Short Linear Protein Motifs and Their Flanking Regions , 2009, PloS one.

[34]  G. Montelione,et al.  Crystal structure of human retinoblastoma binding protein 9 , 2009, Proteins.

[35]  Richard J. Edwards,et al.  Masking residues using context-specific evolutionary conservation significantly improves short linear motif discovery , 2009, Bioinform..

[36]  J. Sage,et al.  Cellular mechanisms of tumour suppression by the retinoblastoma gene , 2008, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[37]  Patrick Aloy,et al.  Contextual Specificity in Peptide-Mediated Protein Interactions , 2008, PloS one.

[38]  N. Dyson,et al.  RBF1 promotes chromatin condensation through a conserved interaction with the Condensin II protein dCAP-D3. , 2008, Genes & development.

[39]  Ronen Marmorstein,et al.  Structure of the retinoblastoma protein bound to adenovirus E1A reveals the molecular basis for viral oncoprotein inactivation of a tumor suppressor. , 2007, Genes & development.

[40]  F. Dick Structure-function analysis of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein – is the whole a sum of its parts? , 2007, Cell Division.

[41]  M. Kitagawa,et al.  Phosphorylation of pRB at Ser612 by Chk1/2 leads to a complex between pRB and E2F‐1 after DNA damage , 2007, The EMBO journal.

[42]  Frederick A. Dick,et al.  Retinoblastoma protein and anaphase-promoting complex physically interact and functionally cooperate during cell-cycle exit , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[43]  Walter Hunziker,et al.  Convergent and Divergent Ligand Specificity among PDZ Domains of the LAP and Zonula Occludens (ZO) Families* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[44]  Mahavir Singh,et al.  Molecular Determinants for the Complex Formation between the Retinoblastoma Protein and LXCXE Sequences* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[45]  Conrad C. Huang,et al.  UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[46]  Bostjan Kobe,et al.  Structural Basis for the Specificity of Bipartite Nuclear Localization Sequence Binding by Importin-α* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[47]  M. Burghammer,et al.  Crystal structure of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein bound to E2F and the molecular basis of its regulation , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  Ivo Tews,et al.  Specificity determinants of recruitment peptides bound to phospho-CDK2/cyclin A. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[49]  Jeong Ho Chang,et al.  Structural basis for the recognition of the E2F transactivation domain by the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor. , 2002, Genes & development.

[50]  S. Reed,et al.  The pRb-related protein p130 is regulated by phosphorylation-dependent proteolysis via the protein-ubiquitin ligase SCF(Skp2). , 2002, Genes & development.

[51]  S. Schreiber,et al.  Histone Deacetylase 1 Phosphorylation Promotes Enzymatic Activity and Complex Formation* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[52]  Q. Dou,et al.  Sequential two-step cleavage of the retinoblastoma protein by caspase-3/-7 during etoposide-induced apoptosis , 2001, Oncogene.

[53]  Yunje Cho,et al.  Structural basis for the inactivation of retinoblastoma tumor suppressor by SV40 large T antigen , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[54]  N. Dyson,et al.  Retinoblastoma protein partners. , 2001, Advances in cancer research.

[55]  Jie-Oh Lee,et al.  Structure of the retinoblastoma tumour-suppressor pocket domain bound to a peptide from HPV E7 , 1998, Nature.

[56]  P. Branton,et al.  Importance of the Ser-132 phosphorylation site in cell transformation and apoptosis induced by the adenovirus type 5 E1A protein , 1996, Journal of virology.

[57]  K. Helin,et al.  Independent regions of adenovirus E1A are required for binding to and dissociation of E2F-protein complexes , 1993, Molecular and cellular biology.

[58]  David M. Livingston,et al.  Functional interactions of the retinoblastoma protein with mammalian D-type cyclins , 1993, Cell.

[59]  R. Weinberg,et al.  Physical interaction of the retinoblastoma protein with human D cyclins , 1993, Cell.

[60]  C. Anderson,et al.  The retinoblastoma protein is phosphorylated on multiple sites by human cdc2. , 1991, The EMBO journal.

[61]  R. Peters,et al.  The rate of nuclear cytoplasmic protein transport is determined by the casein kinase II site flanking the nuclear localization sequence of the SV40 T‐antigen. , 1991, The EMBO journal.

[62]  V. Garsky,et al.  Identification of HPV-16 E7 peptides that are potent antagonists of E7 binding to the retinoblastoma suppressor protein. , 1990, The Journal of biological chemistry.