Optimal response to chemotherapy for a mathematical model of tumor–immune dynamics

An optimal control problem for cancer chemotherapy is considered that includes immunological activity. In the objective a weighted average of several quantities that describe the effectiveness of treatment is minimized. These terms include (i) the number of cancer cells at the terminal time, (ii) a measure for the immunocompetent cell densities at the terminal point (included as a negative term), (iii) the overall amount of cytotoxic agents given as a measure for the side effects of treatment and (iv) a small penalty on the terminal time that limits the overall therapy horizon which is assumed to be free. This last term is essential in obtaining a well-posed problem formulation. Employing a Gompertzian growth model for the cancer cells, for various scenarios optimal controls and corresponding responses of the system are calculated. Solutions initially follow a full dose treatment, but then at one point switch to a singular regimen that only applies partial dosages. This structure is consistent with protocols that apply an initial burst to reduce the tumor volume and then maintain a small volume through lower dosages. Optimal controls end with either a prolonged period of no dose treatment or, in a small number of scenarios, this no dose interval is still followed by one more short burst of full dose treatment.

[1]  H. Schättler,et al.  On optimal delivery of combination therapy for tumors. , 2009, Mathematical biosciences.

[2]  Urszula Ledzewicz,et al.  Bang-bang and singular controls in a mathematical model for combined anti-angiogenic and chemotherapy treatments , 2009, Proceedings of the 48h IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) held jointly with 2009 28th Chinese Control Conference.

[3]  A. d’Onofrio A general framework for modeling tumor-immune system competition and immunotherapy: Mathematical analysis and biomedical inferences , 2005, 1309.3337.

[4]  B.D.O. Anderson,et al.  Singular optimal control problems , 1975, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[5]  M. Golubitsky,et al.  Stable mappings and their singularities , 1973 .

[6]  Richard Bellman,et al.  Introduction to the mathematical theory of control processes , 1967 .

[7]  A. Świerniak,et al.  Direct and indirect control of cancer populations , 2008 .

[8]  Urszula Ledzewicz,et al.  Optimal and suboptimal protocols for a class of mathematical models of tumor anti-angiogenesis. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.

[9]  Anil V. Rao,et al.  Direct Trajectory Optimization and Costate Estimation via an Orthogonal Collocation Method , 2006 .

[10]  L. Norton,et al.  Growth curve of an experimental solid tumor following radiotherapy. , 1977, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[11]  Urszula Ledzewicz,et al.  Dynamics of tumor-immune interaction under treatment as an optimal control problem , 2011 .

[12]  Benedetto Piccoli,et al.  Optimal Control in a Model of Dendritic Cell Transfection Cancer Immunotherapy , 2006 .

[13]  Urszula Ledzewicz,et al.  Bifurcation of singular arcs in an optimal control problem for cancer immune system interactions under treatment , 2010, 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[14]  D. Kirschner,et al.  Modeling immunotherapy of the tumor – immune interaction , 1998, Journal of mathematical biology.

[15]  Jon Ernstberger,et al.  OPTIMAL CONTROL APPLIED TO IMMUNOTHERAPY , 2003 .

[16]  A. Perelson,et al.  Nonlinear dynamics of immunogenic tumors: parameter estimation and global bifurcation analysis. , 1994, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[17]  David Benson,et al.  A Gauss pseudospectral transcription for optimal control , 2005 .

[18]  H. Schättler,et al.  An Optimal Control Approach to Cancer Treatment under Immunological Activity , 2011 .

[19]  M. Chyba,et al.  Singular Trajectories and Their Role in Control Theory , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[20]  K Renee Fister,et al.  Immunotherapy: an optimal control theory approach. , 2005, Mathematical biosciences and engineering : MBE.

[21]  Urszula Ledzewicz,et al.  OPTIMAL CONTROL FOR A CLASS OF COMPARTMENTAL MODELS IN CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY , 2003 .

[22]  P. Holmes,et al.  Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields , 1983, Applied Mathematical Sciences.

[23]  H. P. de Vladar,et al.  Dynamic response of cancer under the influence of immunological activity and therapy. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[24]  Urszula Ledzewicz,et al.  AntiAngiogenic Therapy in Cancer Treatment as an Optimal Control Problem , 2007, SIAM J. Control. Optim..

[25]  A. d’Onofrio TUMOR-IMMUNE SYSTEM INTERACTION: MODELING THE TUMOR-STIMULATED PROLIFERATION OF EFFECTORS AND IMMUNOTHERAPY , 2006 .

[26]  Rafael Castro-Linares,et al.  Trajectory tracking for non-holonomic cars: A linear approach to controlled leader-follower formation , 2010, 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[27]  Ami Radunskaya,et al.  A mathematical tumor model with immune resistance and drug therapy: an optimal control approach , 2001 .

[28]  Urszula Ledzewicz,et al.  ANALYSIS OF A CELL-CYCLE SPECIFIC MODEL FOR CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY , 2002 .

[29]  L. Wein,et al.  Optimal scheduling of radiotherapy and angiogenic inhibitors , 2003, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[30]  Urszula Ledzewicz,et al.  Realizable protocols for optimal administration of drugs in mathematical models for anti-angiogenic treatment. , 2010, Mathematical medicine and biology : a journal of the IMA.

[31]  A. Gandolfi,et al.  The dynamics of tumour–vasculature interaction suggests low‐dose, time‐dense anti‐angiogenic schedulings , 2009, Cell proliferation.

[32]  L. Norton A Gompertzian model of human breast cancer growth. , 1988, Cancer research.