Environmental sustainability assessment of food waste valorization options

Abstract Food waste can be valorized through different technologies, such as anaerobic digestion, incineration, and animal feed production. In this study we analyzed the environmental performance of two food waste valorization scenarios from a company of the retail sector in Belgium, through exergy analysis, exergetic life cycle assessment (ELCA), and a traditional life cycle assessment (LCA). In scenario 1 all food waste was considered to be valorized in an anaerobic digestion (producing electricity, heat, digestate and sorting the packaging material to be used as fuel for cement industry), while in scenario 2 a bread fraction was valorized to produce animal feed and a non-bread fraction was valorized in an anaerobic digestion (producing the same products on scenario 1, but in lower amounts). Scenario 2 was 10% more efficient than scenario 1 in the exergy analysis. For the ELCA and the single score LCA, scenario 2 presented lower environmental impacts than scenario 1 (32% and 26% lower, respectively). These results were mainly due to the avoided products from traditional supply chain (animal feed produced from agricultural products) and lower exergy loss at the feed production plant. Nevertheless, the high dry matter content of the bread waste played an important role on these results, therefore it should be pointed out that valorizing food waste to animal feed seems to be a better option only for the fractions of food waste with low water content (as bread waste).

[1]  Jo Dewulf,et al.  Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of four alternatives for using by-products of cane sugar production. , 2009 .

[2]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Cumulative energy demand as predictor for the environmental burden of commodity production. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Is cumulative fossil energy demand a useful indicator for the environmental performance of products? , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  Jo Dewulf,et al.  Exergy-based accounting for land as a natural resource in life cycle assessment , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[5]  Mushtaq Ahmed Memon,et al.  Integrated solid waste management based on the 3R approach , 2010 .

[6]  Jo Dewulf,et al.  The environmental sustainability of anaerobic digestion as a biomass valorization technology. , 2012, Bioresource technology.

[7]  Patrick Hofstetter,et al.  Midpoints versus endpoints: The sacrifices and benefits , 2000 .

[8]  Sven Lundie,et al.  LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF FOOD WASTE MANAGEMENT OPTIONS , 2005 .

[9]  Stijn Bruers,et al.  Exergy: its potential and limitations in environmental science and technology. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  Ki-in Choi,et al.  Evaluation of environmental burdens caused by changes of food waste management systems in Seoul, Korea. , 2007, The Science of the total environment.

[11]  Maria Victoria Peeler,et al.  International comparative study of 3R and waste management policy developments , 2011 .

[12]  Jo Dewulf,et al.  Renewables-based technology : sustainability assessment , 2006 .

[13]  J Dewulf,et al.  Cumulative exergy extraction from the natural environment (CEENE): a comprehensive life cycle impact assessment method for resource accounting. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  Jan Szargut,et al.  Exergy Analysis of Thermal, Chemical, and Metallurgical Processes , 1988 .

[15]  Silvia Bargigli,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) of waste management strategies: Landfilling, sorting plant and incineration , 2009 .

[16]  Carlos Mena,et al.  The causes of food waste in the supplier–retailer interface: Evidences from the UK and Spain , 2011 .

[17]  Jung-Wk Kim,et al.  Comparison through a LCA evaluation analysis of food waste disposal options from the perspective of global warming and resource recovery. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[18]  G. Psacharopoulos Overview and methodology , 1991 .

[19]  James W Levis,et al.  What is the most environmentally beneficial way to treat commercial food waste? , 2011, Environmental science & technology.