Rewarding Energy Savings Rather than Energy Efficiency

Financial incentives are important for overcoming certain market barriers to improved energy efficiency and for the adoption of energy efficient technologies. Such incentives are mainly focused on the introduction of specific technologies, rather than behavioral change. While the declared goal of financial support schemes is to save energy or reduce harmful emissions rather than to foster new technologies per se, it is very often encountered that such financial support for energy efficient technologies may not ensure real energy savings due to the rebound effect and remaining barriers. In the area of renewable energies it is common for financial support to be given to power producers for the verified production of renewable electricity, in the form of a guaranteed financial incentive (feed-in tariff). In the energy efficiency policy research little attention has been paid to the possible use of a "feed-in tariff" (FIT), in the form of a financial incentive based on the kWh saved by the end-user. This paper discusses the possible setup of a FIT designed to reward real energy savings (ES FIT). The paper first explores the rationale behind and the possible functionality of an ES FIT, giving examples of similar policy tools implemented or planned. The paper looks into additionality and persistency of energy savings thus supported. Finally, key advantages and complexities related to a FIT scheme for energy savings are discussed, intending to open a discussion and foster further research on the topic.

[1]  W. Golove,et al.  Market barriers to energy efficiency: A critical reappraisal of the rationale for public policies to promote energy efficiency , 1996 .

[2]  Jiang Yun,et al.  The challenge of reducing energy consumption of the Top-1000 largest industrial enterprises in China , 2010 .

[3]  Bertoldi Paolo,et al.  A Step into the Unknown: Feed-in Tariff for Energy Saving , 2007 .

[4]  P. Bertoldi,et al.  Tradable white certificate schemes: fundamental concepts , 2008 .

[5]  Gabrial Anandarajah,et al.  Pathways to a Low-Carbon Economy , 2009 .

[6]  Volkmar Lauber,et al.  REFIT and RPS: options for a harmonised Community framework , 2004 .

[7]  Lt Lorna McCalley,et al.  Energy conservation through product-integrated feedback: The roles of goal-setting and social orientation , 2002 .

[8]  Jeannet H. Van Houwelingen,et al.  The Effect of Goal-Setting and Daily Electronic Feedback on In-Home Energy Use , 1989 .

[9]  Bertoldi Paolo,et al.  Tradable Certificates for Energy Savings (White Certificates) - Theory and Practice , 2006 .

[10]  Rich Ling,et al.  Measured energy savings from a more informative energy bill , 1995 .

[11]  Paul Baudry,et al.  Energy supplier obligations and white certificate schemes: Comparative analysis of experiences in the European Union , 2010 .

[12]  D. ürge-Vorsatz,et al.  Bottom–up assessment of potentials and costs of CO2 emission mitigation in the buildings sector: insights into the missing elements , 2009 .

[13]  L. J. Becker.  Joint effect of feedback and goal setting on performance: a field study of residential energy conservation , 1978 .

[14]  W. Abrahamse.  A review of energy conservation studies. , 2003 .

[15]  Catrinus Jepma,et al.  A framework on interactions of climate and energy policy instruments , 2007 .

[16]  C. Midden,et al.  Using feedback, reinforcement and information to reduce energy consumption in households: A field-experiment , 1983 .