A configuration design based method for platform commonization for product families

Product families help companies reach customers in several different markets, lessen the time needed to develop new products, and reduce costs by sharing common components among many products. The product platform can be considered as a set of technologies, components, or functions, and their arrangements, that are utilized for more than one product. Configuration design focuses on the components in a product and their connections and relationships. Discrete, combinatorial design spaces are used to model design requirements regarding physical connections, module partitions, and assembly sequences for the product family. To ensure that products satisfy all design requirements, it is necessary to combine these design spaces into a common configuration space into which all requirements can be mapped. This paper presents computational methods for modeling and combining design spaces so those configurations can be identified that satisfy all constraints. A new representation of assembly sequences facilitates the development of an assembly design space, elements of which can be enumerated readily. Because the size of the combinatorial design spaces can become quite large, computational efficiency is an important consideration. A new designer guided method, called the partitioning method, is presented for decomposing configuration design problems in a hierarchical manner that enables significant reductions in design space sizes. An example of a family of automotive underbodies illustrates the application of the discrete design space approach to develop a common platform.

[1]  David W. Rosen,et al.  On combinatorial design spaces for the configuration design of product families , 2001, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[2]  J. Gero,et al.  Evolving designs by generating useful complex gene structures , 1999 .

[3]  M. Heinrich,et al.  A resource-based paradigm for the configuring of technical systems from modular components , 1991, [1991] Proceedings. The Seventh IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence Application.

[4]  David W. Rosen,et al.  Implications of Modularity on Product Design for the Life Cycle , 1998 .

[5]  Sridhar Kota,et al.  Functions, structures, and constraints in conceptual design , 1990 .

[6]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[7]  David W. Rosen,et al.  PRODUCT PLATFORM DESIGN: A GRAPH GRAMMAR APPROACH , 1999 .

[8]  Donald L. Kreher,et al.  Combinatorial algorithms: generation, enumeration, and search , 1998, SIGA.

[9]  Reijo Sulonen,et al.  Towards a general ontology of configuration , 1998, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[10]  James R. Munkres,et al.  Topology; a first course , 1974 .

[11]  Brian Falkenhainer,et al.  Dynamic Constraint Satisfaction Problems , 1990, AAAI.

[12]  P. A. Macmahon,et al.  Yoke‐Chains and Multipartite Compositions in connexion with the Analytical forms called “Trees” , 1890 .

[13]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  A Blend of Different Tastes: The Language of Coffeemakers , 1998 .

[14]  John R. Dixon,et al.  A review of research in mechanical engineering design. Part I: Descriptive, prescriptive, and computer-based models of design processes , 1989 .

[15]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Case-Based Reasoning , 1989, IJCAI 1989.

[16]  Mark V. Martin,et al.  DESIGN FOR VARIETY: DEVELOPMENT OF COMPLEXITY INDICES AND DESIGN CHARTS , 1998 .

[17]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  An improved shape annealing algorithm for truss topology , 1995 .

[18]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  Influencing generative design through continuous evaluation: Associating costs with the coffeemaker shape grammar , 1999, Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf..

[19]  Earl D. Sacerdoti,et al.  Planning in a Hierarchy of Abstraction Spaces , 1974, IJCAI.

[20]  Z. A. Lomnicki Two-terminal series-parallel networks , 1972, Advances in Applied Probability.

[21]  T. Schnier,et al.  Genetic Engineering and Design Problems , 1997 .

[22]  D. V. Steward Systems Analysis and Management: Structure, Strategy and Design , 1981 .

[23]  Brian Corbett Configuration design methods and mathematics for product families , 2003 .

[24]  Javier P. Gonzalez-Zugasti,et al.  A Method for Architecting Product Platforms , 2000 .