New proportionate affine projection sign algorithms

In this paper, two proportionate affine projection sign algorithms are introduced. The performance of the proposed algorithms is compared with that of other proportionate affine algorithms under impulsive interference environment of a network echo cancellation system. It is shown that one of the proposed algorithms, termed memory improved proportionate affine projection sign algorithm (MIP-APSA), is the most robust to impulsive interferences and colored inputs. It is proved that MIP-APSA is a good candidate for network echo cancellation, because of its low complexity, good convergence speed and tracking abilities for echo paths with different sparseness measures, and projection orders.

[1]  Jie Yang,et al.  Efficient μ-law improved proportionate affine projection algorithm for echo cancellation , 2011 .

[2]  F. Albu,et al.  A variable step size modified decorrelated NLMS algorithm for adaptive feedback cancellation in hearing aids , 2012, 2012 10th International Symposium on Electronics and Telecommunications.

[3]  Felix Albu New Proportionate Affine Projection Algorithm , 2012 .

[4]  F. Albu Simplified proportionate affine projection algorithms , 2012, 2012 19th International Conference on Systems, Signals and Image Processing (IWSSIP).

[5]  Akihiko Sugiyama,et al.  A generalized proportionate variable step-size algorithm for fast changing acoustic environments , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[6]  Yahong Rosa Zheng,et al.  Proportionate Affine Projection Sign Algorithms for Network Echo Cancellation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[7]  Jacob Benesty,et al.  An Affine Projection Sign Algorithm Robust Against Impulsive Interferences , 2010, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[8]  Jacob Benesty,et al.  A low complexity proportionate affine projection algorithm for echo cancellation , 2010, 2010 18th European Signal Processing Conference.

[9]  Yahong Rosa Zheng,et al.  Proportionate affine projection sign algorithms for sparse system identification in impulsive interference , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[10]  Donald L. Duttweiler,et al.  Proportionate normalized least-mean-squares adaptation in echo cancelers , 2000, IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process..

[11]  Felix Albu,et al.  Affine projection algorithms: Evolution to smart and fast algorithms and applications , 2012, 2012 Proceedings of the 20th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO).

[12]  Gerhard Schmidt,et al.  Topics in Acoustic Echo and Noise Control , 2006 .

[13]  Hon Keung Kwan,et al.  Fast block exact Gauss-Seidel pseudo affine projection algorithm , 2004 .

[14]  Jacob Benesty,et al.  An Efficient Proportionate Affine Projection Algorithm for Echo Cancellation , 2010, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[15]  Patrik O. Hoyer,et al.  Non-negative Matrix Factorization with Sparseness Constraints , 2004, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[16]  Felix Albu A PROPORTIONATE AFFINE PROJECTION ALGORITHM USING FAST RECURSIVE FILTERING AND DICHOTOMOUS COORDINAT , 2011 .

[17]  Alexandru Drimbarean,et al.  Adaptive recovery of motion blur point spread function from differently exposed images , 2010, Electronic Imaging.

[18]  Kazuhiko Ozeki,et al.  An adaptive filtering algorithm using an orthogonal projection to an affine subspace and its properties , 1984 .

[19]  Hon Keung Kwan,et al.  Memory improved proportionate affine projection sign algorithm , 2012 .

[20]  Sang Woo Kim,et al.  Pseudo affine projection sign algorithm for robust system identification , 2010 .

[21]  Milos Doroslovacki,et al.  Proportionate adaptive algorithms for network echo cancellation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.