Interactive governance and governability: an introduction

Th is paper introduces two concepts - interactive governance and governability - with a view to exploring their applicability for assessing the governance of natural resource systems. Governance in its broad sense suggests that not only the state but also market and civil society have prominent roles in the governing of modern societies, from local to international levels. Interactive governance highlights the interactions between entities belonging to these societal parties. Govern- ability is defi ned as the governance status of a societal sector or system such as a fi shery or a coastal region as a whole. Th e assessment of such governability is approached by recognizing this whole to consist of three coherent analytical components: the system-to-be-governed , its governing system and their governance interactions. Distinguishing and conceptualising these three components forms a step in the process in which the governability of societal systems can be assessed. Th e paper uses examples from the fi eld of capture fi sheries to illustrate the potential utility of governabilility as an assessment framework.

[1]  Laurence E. Lynn,et al.  Public Management: Old and New , 2006 .

[2]  M. Bavinck.  Understanding Fisheries Conflicts in the South—A Legal Pluralist Perspective , 2005 .

[3]  Jurian Edelenbos,et al.  Interactive policy development: Undermining or sustaining democracy? , 2005 .

[4]  N. Devas.  Urban Governance Voice and Poverty in the Developing World , 2004 .

[5]  Uta Hohn,et al.  New urban governance: Institutional change and consequences for urban development , 2006 .

[6]  Jesper Raakjær,et al.  The Fisheries Co-management Experience , 2003, Fish and Fisheries Series.

[7]  D. Blandino,et al.  The Power of , 2005 .

[8]  Implications of the earth summit for ocean and coastal governance , 1993 .

[9]  Robert Jervis,et al.  System Effects: Complexity in Political and Social Life , 1997 .

[10]  Ratana Chuenpagdee,et al.  Interactive Fisheries Governance: A Guide to Better Practice , 2005 .

[11]  C. Ehler.  Indicators to measure governance performance in integrated coastal management , 2003 .

[12]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[13]  J. Bryson.  What to do when Stakeholders matter , 2004 .

[14]  E. Sørensen,et al.  Theories of democratic network governance , 2007 .

[15]  Jacob Torfing,et al.  Democratic network governance in Europe , 2007 .

[16]  J. Kooiman,et al.  Exploring the Concept of Governability , 2008, Institutions and Governance in Comparative Policy Analysis Studies.

[17]  Seppo Tiihonen,et al.  From Governing to Governance , 2004 .

[18]  P. Berger,et al.  The Social Construction of Reality , 1966 .

[19]  G. Brady.  Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action , 1993 .

[20]  S. Jentoft,et al.  Creative governance : opportunities for fisheries in Europe , 1999 .

[21]  M. Hayashi.  Global Governance of Deep-Sea Fisheries , 2004 .

[22]  Anita Maurstad,et al.  In whose interest? An exploratory analysis of stakeholders in Norwegian coastal zone planning , 2004 .