Beyond the regime: can Integrated Sustainability Assessment address the barriers to effective sustainable passenger mobility policy?

Sustainability policy making is hampered by a tendency towards sector-based, short-term and often techno-fix perspectives. This paper describes a novel policy development and assessment framework – Integrated Sustainability Assessment (ISA) – that may help address problems of unsustainability in a more integrated and strategic manner. ISA involves two primary methods: transition analysis and stakeholder engagement. The ISA case study on sustainable passenger mobility suggests ISA is well equipped to produce a holistic analysis of mobility systems, illustrate radical alternatives to the status quo and foster social learning. Further research should explore its potential to induce long-term behavioural or institutional change.

[1]  S. Jasanoff,et al.  The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. , 1991 .

[2]  S. Mourato,et al.  Analysing awareness and acceptability of hydrogen vehicles: A London case study , 2005 .

[3]  M. Kerkhof,et al.  Making a difference: On the constraints of consensus building and the relevance of deliberation in stakeholder dialogues , 2006 .

[4]  Lorraine Whitmarsh,et al.  Participation of Experts and Non-Experts in a Sustainability Assessment of Mobility , 2009 .

[5]  Christy Mihyeon Jeon,et al.  Addressing Sustainability in Transportation Systems: Definitions, Indicators, and Metrics , 2005 .

[6]  A. Jordan,et al.  Gearing-up governance for sustainable development: Patterns of policy appraisal in United Kingdom central government , 2006 .

[7]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  The personal CO2 calculator: A modeling tool for Participatory Integrated Assessment methods , 1999 .

[8]  Chris Fry,et al.  Emerging approaches to integrated appraisal in the UK , 2005 .

[9]  Daniel J. Fiorino.  Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms , 1990 .

[10]  Suzan Dagg,et al.  Sustainability Assessment of Future Scenarios: Methodology and Application to Mountain Areas of Europe , 2008, Environmental management.

[11]  S. Polasky,et al.  Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  R. Perrin,et al.  Net energy of cellulosic ethanol from switchgrass , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  A. Blok.  Experts on public trial: on democratizing expertise through a Danish consensus conference , 2007 .

[14]  B. Nykvist,et al.  Why is integrating policy assessment so hard? A comparative analysis of the institutional capacities and constraints , 2008 .

[15]  L. Schipper,et al.  Towards a sustainable future , 1992 .

[16]  B. Siebenhüner.  Social learning and sustainability science: which role can stakeholder participation play? , 2004 .

[17]  Philip J. Vergragt,et al.  Institutional Change in the Automotive Industry , 2004 .

[18]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  A New Scientific Methodology for Global Environmental Issues , 1991 .

[19]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method, and Practice , 1995 .

[20]  A. van Knippenberg,et al.  Habit versus planned behaviour: a field experiment. , 1998, The British journal of social psychology.

[21]  Lorraine Whitmarsh,et al.  Integrated sustainability assessment of mobility transitions: Simulating stakeholders' visions of and pathways to sustainable land-based mobility , 2008 .

[22]  Robert Dyball,et al.  Social Learning in Environmental Management: Towards a Sustainable Future , 2005 .

[23]  Claudio M. Radaelli,et al.  The role of knowledge in the policy process , 1995 .

[24]  A. Elzinga.  The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1997 .

[25]  John Turnpenny,et al.  Rationalising the Policy Mess? Ex Ante Policy Assessment and the Utilisation of Knowledge in the Policy Process , 2009 .

[26]  Jan Rotmans,et al.  Managing the Transition to Sustainable Mobility , 2004 .

[27]  Dennis Anderson,et al.  Sustainable Biofuels: Prospects and Challenges , 2008 .

[28]  Jill Jäger,et al.  Citizen participation in sustainability assessments , 2003 .

[29]  Pier Vellinga,et al.  The Relevance of Participatory Approaches in Integrated Environmental Assessment , 2001 .

[30]  Andrea Lenschow,et al.  Environmental policy integration : greening sectoral policies in Europe , 2002 .

[31]  Timothy O'Riordan,et al.  The psychology of denial concerning climate mitigation measures: evidence from Swiss focus groups , 2001 .

[32]  Måns Nilsson,et al.  Are impact assessment procedures actually promoting sustainable development? Institutional perspectives on barriers and opportunities found in the Swedish committee system , 2009 .

[33]  S. Rayner,et al.  Human choice and climate change , 1998 .

[34]  P. Valkering,et al.  Participatory Integrated Sustainability Assessment of Water Systems. Lessons from the Ebro River Basin , 2008 .

[35]  W. Tuinstra,et al.  Learning and evaluation in Integrated Sustainability Assessment , 2008 .

[36]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  The Importance of Social Learning in Restoring the Multifunctionality of Rivers and Floodplains , 2006 .

[37]  Sophie A. Nicholson-Cole,et al.  Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications , 2007 .

[38]  Angus Morrison-Saunders,et al.  Conceptualising sustainability assessment , 2004 .

[39]  Lorraine Whitmarsh,et al.  Transition to sustainable development in the UK housing sector: From case study to model implementation , 2008 .

[40]  Roger Jones,et al.  THE BENEFITS OF CLIMATE POLICY: IMPROVING INFORMATION FOR POLICY MAKERS , 2003 .

[41]  Lorraine Whitmarsh,et al.  Sustainable Transport Visions: What Role for Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Vehicle Technologies? , 2008 .

[42]  P. Vergragt,et al.  Institutional Change in the Automotive Industry Or how fuel cell technology is being institutionalised , 2004 .

[43]  Jan Rotmans,et al.  Integrated sustainability assessment: what is it, why do it and how? , 2006 .

[44]  J. Jiggins,et al.  Governance of complex environmental situations through social learning: a synthesis of SLIM's lessons for research, policy and practice , 2007 .

[45]  Jan Rotmans,et al.  Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2003 Organisation De Coopération Et De Développement Economiques Working Party on Global and Structural Policies Oecd Workshop on the Benefits of Climate Policy: Improving Information for Policy Makers Managing Societal Transitions: Dilemmas and , 2022 .

[46]  M. Kerkhof,et al.  Learning and stakeholder participation in transition processes towards sustainability: Methodological considerations , 2005 .

[47]  M. V. Asselt,et al.  More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy , 2001 .

[48]  H. Davies,et al.  Using Evidence: How research can inform public services , 2007 .

[49]  J. Norberg,et al.  ADAPTIVE GOVERNANCE OF SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS , 2005 .

[50]  John Turnpenny,et al.  THE POLICY AND POLITICS OF POLICY APPRAISAL: EMERGING TRENDS AND NEW DIRECTIONS , 2009 .

[51]  Dilys Williams,et al.  Promoting sustainable Indian textiles: final report to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), London, UK , 2010 .

[52]  Glenda Verrinder,et al.  Review of: Keen, M., Brown, VA, and Dyball, B. (Eds.), (2005), Social learning in environmental management: Towards a sustainable future. London, UK: Earthscan , 2006 .

[53]  Dimitri Devuyst.  SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT: THE APPLICATION OF A METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK , 1999 .

[54]  John Turnpenny,et al.  A FRAMEWORK FOR TOOL SELECTION AND USE IN INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT , 2007 .

[55]  H. Bulkeley,et al.  New Realism and Local Realities: Local Transport Planning in Leicester and Cambridgeshire , 2003 .

[56]  Massimo Marraffa,et al.  Organizational learning II: Theory, method and practice , 1998 .

[57]  Richard Bull,et al.  Social learning from public engagement: dreaming the impossible? , 2008 .

[58]  F. Geels,et al.  Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways , 2007 .

[59]  David M. Stoms,et al.  Annual Review of Environment and Resources , 2006 .

[60]  S. Owens.  ‘Engaging the Public’: Information and Deliberation in Environmental Policy , 2000 .

[61]  Lorraine Whitmarsh,et al.  Modelling Socio-Technical Transition Patterns and Pathways , 2008, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[62]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  The role of public participation in managing uncertainty in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive , 2005 .

[63]  Lorraine Whitmarsh,et al.  A Conceptual Framework for transition modelling , 2008 .

[64]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[65]  Måns Nilsson,et al.  Framework for analysing environmental policy integration , 2003 .

[66]  Adrian Smith,et al.  The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions , 2005 .

[67]  Pramod Kale,et al.  Sustainable development—Critical issues , 1992 .

[68]  Andrew Jordan,et al.  Gearing-up governance for sustainable development: Patterns of policy appraisal in UK central government , 2007 .

[69]  Peter Hidas,et al.  Changing Travel Behaviour , 2005 .

[70]  F. Geels.  Technological Transitions And System Innovations: A Co-evolutionary And Socio-technical Analysis , 2005 .

[71]  Lorraine Whitmarsh,et al.  A transitions model for sustainable mobility , 2009 .

[72]  Maria Rosário Partidário,et al.  Development of a framework to assist the integration of environmental, social and economic issues in spatial planning , 2000 .

[73]  A. Wokaun,et al.  Public Participation in Sustainability Science: Introduction , 2003 .

[74]  Simon Joss,et al.  Public participation in science : the role of consensus conferences in Europe , 1995 .

[75]  L. Whitmarsh,et al.  A multi-level analysis of sustainable mobility transitions: Niche development in the UK and Sweden , 2008 .