Toward unrestricted use of public genomic data

Publication interests should not limit access to public data Despite some notable progress in data sharing policies and practices, restrictions are still often placed on the open and unconditional use of various genomic data after they have received official approval for release to the public domain or to public databases. These restrictions, which often conflict with the terms and conditions of the funding bodies who supported the release of those data for the benefit of the scientific community and society, are perpetuated by the lack of clear guiding rules for data usage. Existing guidelines for data released to the public domain recognize but fail to resolve tensions between the importance of free and unconditional use of these data and the “right” of the data producers to the first publication. This self-contradiction has resulted in a loophole that allows different interpretations and a continuous debate between data producers and data users on the use of public data. We argue that the publicly available data should be treated as open data, a shared resource with unrestricted use for analysis, interpretation, and publication.

[1]  Christopher P Austin,et al.  Prepublication data sharing , 2009, Nature.

[2]  Norman Paskin,et al.  Studies on Monitoring and Tracking Genetic Resources: An Executive Summary , 2009, Standards in genomic sciences.

[3]  J. M. Hancock,et al.  Post-publication sharing of data and tools , 2009, Nature.

[4]  John Wilbanks,et al.  'Omics Data Sharing , 2009, Science.

[5]  M. Schatz,et al.  Big Data: Astronomical or Genomical? , 2015, PLoS biology.

[6]  Robert Cook-Deegan,et al.  Sharing Data to Build a Medical Information Commons: From Bermuda to the Global Alliance. , 2017, Annual review of genomics and human genetics.

[7]  Casey S Greene,et al.  Celebrating parasites , 2017, Nature Genetics.

[8]  F. Arnaud,et al.  From core referencing to data re-use: two French national initiatives to reinforce paleodata stewardship (National Cyber Core Repository and LTER France Retro-Observatory) , 2017 .

[9]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Reproducible research practices, transparency, and open access data in the biomedical literature, 2015–2017 , 2018, PLoS biology.

[10]  Jacques Ravel,et al.  “Available upon request”: not good enough for microbiome data! , 2018, Microbiome.

[11]  Elizabeth Pennisi,et al.  Researchers reboot ambitious effort to sequence all vertebrate genomes, but challenges loom , 2018, Science.

[12]  K. Kupferschmidt Biologists raise alarm over changes to biopiracy rules. , 2018, Science.

[13]  David Moher,et al.  Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure , 2018, PLoS biology.

[14]  David Moher,et al.  Data sharing and reanalysis of randomized controlled trials in leading biomedical journals with a full data sharing policy: survey of studies published in The BMJ and PLOS Medicine , 2018, British Medical Journal.