Product architecture, inter-firm vertical coordination and knowledge partitioning in the auto industry
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Sarah Kaplan. Framing Contests: Strategy Making Under Uncertainty , 2008, Organ. Sci..
[2] Michael G. Jacobides,et al. How Capability Differences, Transaction Costs, and Learning Curves Interact to Shape Vertical Scope , 2008, Organ. Sci..
[3] F. Veloso,et al. Interfirm Innovation under Uncertainty: Empirical Evidence for Strategic Knowledge Partitioning* , 2008 .
[4] R. Grant. Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .
[5] Elaine Romanelli,et al. Inertia, environments and strategic choice: a quasi-experimental design for comparative-longitudinal research , 1986 .
[6] Vincent Frigant,et al. Technological Determinism and Modularity: Lessons from a Comparison between Aircraft and Auto Industries in Europe , 2005 .
[7] Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al. Managing in an age of modularity. , 1997, Harvard business review.
[8] Stefano Brusoni,et al. Special Issue: Organizational Design: Making Design Rules: A Multidomain Perspective , 2006, Organ. Sci..
[9] Will Mitchell,et al. Complementarity, capabilities, and the boundaries of the firm: the impact of within‐firm and interfirm expertise on concurrent sourcing of complementary components , 2009 .
[10] R. Gilson,et al. Contracting for Innovation: Vertical Disintegration and Interfirm Collaboration , 2008 .
[11] Frits K. Pil,et al. Modularity: Implications for Imitation, Innovation, and Sustained Advantage , 2006 .
[12] Juliana Hsuan Mikkola,et al. Modularity, component outsourcing, and inter‐firm learning , 2003 .
[13] Jeffrey K. Liker,et al. Modularisation and outsourcing: who drives whom? A study of generational sequences in the US automotive cockpit industry , 2005 .
[14] Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al. Where do transactions come from? Modularity, transactions, and the boundaries of firms , 2007 .
[15] A. Gawer,et al. Industry architecture as a determinant of successful platform strategies: a case study of the i‐mode mobile Internet service , 2009 .
[16] Peter Galvin,et al. MODULARITY ON INDUSTRY STRUCTURE: THE CASE OF THE WORLD THE EFFECT OF PRODUCT BICYCLE INDUSTRY , 2001 .
[17] M. Jacobides. Industry Change Through Vertical Dis-Integration: How and Why Markets Emerged in Mortgage Banking , 2004 .
[18] A. Tiwana. Does technological modularity substitute for control? A study of alliance performance in software outsourcing , 2008 .
[19] Melissa A. Schilling. Toward a General Modular Systems Theory and Its Application to Interfirm Product Modularity , 2000 .
[20] Anne Parmigiani,et al. Why Do Firms Both Make and Buy? An Investigation of Concurrent Sourcing , 2007 .
[21] M. Jacobides,et al. Benefiting from Innovation: Value Creation, Value Appropriation and the Role of Industry Architectures , 2006 .
[22] S. Fixson,et al. The Power of Integrality: Linkages between Product Architecture, Innovation, and Industry Structure , 2007 .
[23] Nicholas Argyres,et al. Does Transaction Misalignment Matter for Firm Survival at All Stages of the Industry Life Cycle? , 2007, Manag. Sci..
[24] Ron Sanchez,et al. Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design , 1996 .
[25] K. Pavitt,et al. Knowledge Specialization, Organizational Coupling, and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More than They Make? , 2001 .
[26] Stefano Brusoni,et al. The Limits to Specialization: Problem Solving and Coordination in ‘Modular Networks’ , 2005 .
[27] M. Jacobides,et al. The Dynamic Limits of Specialization: Vertical Integration Reconsidered , 2005 .
[28] Steven A. Melnyk,et al. The scientific theory‐building process: a primer using the case of TQM , 1998 .
[29] Kyle J. Mayer,et al. Learning to Contract: Evidence from the Personal Computer Industry , 2004, Organ. Sci..
[30] Stephan Billinger,et al. Special Issue: Organizational Design: Designing the Boundaries of the Firm: From "Make, Buy, or Ally" to the Dynamic Benefits of Vertical Architecture , 2006, Organ. Sci..
[31] R. Langlois. The Vanishing Hand: The Changing Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism , 2001 .
[32] Jack R. Meredith,et al. Building operations management theory through case and field research , 1998 .
[33] G. Hoetker. Do Modular Products Lead to Modular Organizations , 2006 .
[34] M. Gordon,et al. PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .
[35] Maryam Nasiriyar,et al. Knowledge integration and vertical specialization in the semiconductor industry , 2009 .
[36] C. Wolter,et al. The Effects of Innovation on Vertical Structure: Perspectives on Transaction Costs and Competences , 2008 .
[37] Fabrizio Salvador,et al. Toward a Product System Modularity Construct: Literature Review and Reconceptualization , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.
[38] Steven D. Eppinger,et al. Identifying Modular and Integrative Systems and Their Impact on Design Team Interactions , 2003 .
[39] Charles F. Sabel,et al. Neither Modularity nor Relational Contracting: Inter-Firm Collaboration in the New Economy , 2004, Enterprise & Society.
[40] R. Garud,et al. Changing competitive dynamics in network industries: An exploration of sun microsystems' open systems strategy , 1993 .
[41] S. Winter,et al. The Co-evolution of Capabilities and Transaction Costs: Explaining the Institutional Structure of Production , 2005 .
[42] Dieter Ernst,et al. Limits to Modularity: Reflections on Recent Developments in Chip Design , 2005 .
[43] Daniel A. Levinthal,et al. Temporarily Divide to Conquer: Centralized, Decentralized, and Reintegrated Organizational Approaches to Exploration and Adaptation , 2003 .
[44] Jeffrey K. Liker,et al. Modularity as a Strategy for Supply Chain Coordination: The Case of U.S. Auto , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.
[45] Raghu Garud,et al. CHARGING COMPETITIVE DYNAMICS IN NETWORK INDUSTRIES: AN EXPLORATION OF SUM MICROSYSTEMS' OPEN , 1993 .
[46] Fabrizio Ferraro,et al. Building architectural advantage in the US motion picture industry: Lew Wasserman and the Music Corporation of America , 2009 .
[47] Akira Takeishi,et al. Special Issue: Knowledge, Knowing, and Organizations: Knowledge Partitioning in the Interfirm Division of Labor: The Case of Automotive Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..
[48] A. Gawer,et al. How Companies Become Platform Leaders , 2008 .
[49] Henry Chesbrough,et al. Networks of innovation and modularity: a dynamic perspective , 2008, Int. J. Technol. Manag..
[50] Christopher L. Tucci,et al. Interfirm Modularity and Its Implications for Product Development , 2005 .
[51] Steven D. Eppinger,et al. The Misalignment of Product Architecture and Organizational Structure in Complex Product Development , 2004, Manag. Sci..
[52] S. Brusoni,et al. Unpacking the Black Box of Modularity: Technologies, Products and Organizations , 2001 .
[53] Christina L. Ahmadjian,et al. Organizational Learning and Purchase-Supply Relations in Japan: Hitachi, Matsushita, and Toyota Compared , 1998 .
[54] Charles F. Sabel,et al. Pragmatic Collaborations: Advancing Knowledge While Controlling Opportunism , 2000 .
[55] TakeishiAkira. Knowledge Partitioning in the Interfirm Division of Labor , 2002 .
[56] Jeffrey K. Liker,et al. Evolving Models of Supplier Involvement in Design: The Deterioration of the Japanese Model in U.S. Auto , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.
[57] K. Eisenhardt. Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.
[58] Anand Swaminathan,et al. Modularity and the Impact of Buyer - Supplier Relationships on the Survival of Suppliers , 2007, Manag. Sci..