The roles of location specificity and masking mechanisms in the attentional blink

In a series of four experiments using rapid serial visual presentations of two target letters embedded in numeral distractors, with different numbers of display positions and with or without masking, we show that (1) the nonmonotonic, U-shaped attentional blink (AB) function, which occurs when all items are presented at the same display location, is eliminated in favor of a monotonic function when targets and distractors are presented randomly dispersed over four or nine adjacent positions; (2) the AB monotonicity is maintained with the spatially distributed presentation even when backward masks are used in all possible stimulus positions and when the location of the next item in sequence is predictable; and (3) the If-shaped AB is not due to position-specific forward or backward masking effects occurring at early levels of visual processing. We tentatively conclude that the U-shaped AB is primarily a function of the interruption of late visual processing produced when the item following the first target occurs at the same location. In order for the AB to severely disrupt performance, the item following the first target must be presented at the same location as the target so that it can serve both as a distractor and as a mask interrupting or interfering with subsequent visual processing.

[1]  Kimron Shapiro,et al.  Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision , 1994, Nature.

[2]  J. Lupiáñez,et al.  Does IOR occur in discrimination tasks? Yes, it does, but later , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Attentional requirements in a ‘preattentive’ feature search task , 1997, Nature.

[4]  M. S. Mayzner,et al.  VISUAL INFORMATION PROCESSING WITH SEQUENTIAL INPUTS: A GENERAL MODEL FOR SEQUENTIAL BLANKING, DISPLACEMENT, AND OVERPRINTING PHENOMENA * , 1970 .

[5]  H. Egeth,et al.  Beyond similarity: Masking of the target is sufficient to cause the attentional blink , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles , 1988 .

[7]  Karen M. Arnell,et al.  Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in rapid serial visual presentation. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  B. Breitmeyer,et al.  U-shaped backward contour masking during stroboscopic motion. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Bruno G. Breitmeyer,et al.  Visual masking : an integrative approach , 1984 .

[10]  M T Turvey,et al.  Central sources of visual masking: Indexing structures supporting seeing at a single, brief glance , 1979, Psychological research.

[11]  B. Breitmeyer,et al.  Contour suppression during stroboscopic motion and metacontrast. , 1974, Vision research.

[12]  K. Shapiro,et al.  Temporal allocation of visual attention: Inhibition or interference? , 1994 .

[13]  E. Warrington,et al.  Further Studies on the Masking of brief Visual Stimuli by a Random Pattern , 1962 .

[14]  V. Lollo,et al.  Low-level masking in the attentional blink , 1997 .

[15]  K L Shapiro,et al.  Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? . , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  L A Lefton,et al.  Backward and forward masking as a function of stimulus and task parameters. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  M. S. Mayzner,et al.  A study of sequential blanking and overprinting combined , 1970 .

[18]  D. Broadbent,et al.  From detection to identification: Response to multiple targets in rapid serial visual presentation , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  K L Shapiro,et al.  Similarity determines the attentional blink. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  D J Mewhort,et al.  Spatial localization in sequential letter displays. , 1975, Canadian journal of psychology.

[21]  D. Pelli,et al.  The information capacity of visual attention , 1992, Vision Research.

[22]  M. Chun,et al.  Types and tokens in visual processing: a double dissociation between the attentional blink and repetition blindness. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  Amishi P. Jha,et al.  What Is Inhibited in Inhibition of Return , 1996 .

[24]  V. Lollo,et al.  Beyond the attentional blink: visual masking by object substitution. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  G. Sperling,et al.  Extremely Rapid Visual Search: The Maximum Rate of Scanning Letters for the Presence of a Numeral , 1971, Science.

[26]  P H Schiller,et al.  Forward and backward masking: a comparison. , 1966, Canadian journal of psychology.

[27]  G. Sperling,et al.  Dynamics of automatic and controlled visual attention. , 1987, Science.

[28]  Peter H. Schiller,et al.  Forward and backward masking as a function of relative overlap and intensity of test and masking stimuli , 1966 .

[29]  P. H. Schiller,et al.  A comparison of forward and backward masking , 1965 .

[30]  M. Potter,et al.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.