Seasonal Aerosol Acidity, Liquid Water Content and Their Impact on Fine Urban Aerosol in SE Canada

This study explores the drivers of aerosol pH and their impact on the inorganic fraction and mass of aerosol in the S.E. Canadian urban environments of Hamilton and Toronto, Ontario. We find that inter-seasonal pH variability is mostly driven by temperature changes, which cause variations of up to one pH unit. Wintertime acidity is reduced, compared to summertime values. Because of this, the response of aerosol to precursors fundamentally changes between seasons, with a strong sensitivity of aerosol mass to levels of HNO3 in the wintertime. Liquid water content (LWC) fundamentally influences the aerosol sensitivity to NH3 and HNO3 levels. In the summertime, organic aerosol is mostly responsible for the LWC at Toronto, and ammonium sulfate for Hamilton; in the winter, LWC was mostly associated with ammonium nitrate at both sites. The combination of pH and LWC in the two sites also affects N dry deposition flux; NO3− fluxes were comparable between the two sites, but NH3 deposition flux at Toronto is almost twice what was seen in Hamilton; from November to March N deposition flux slows down leading to an accumulation of N as NO3− in the particle phase and an increase in PM2.5 levels. Given the higher aerosol pH in Toronto, aerosol masses at this site are more sensitive to the emission of HNO3 precursors compared to Hamilton. For both sites, NOx emissions should be better regulated to improve air quality during winter; this is specifically important for the Toronto site as it is thermodynamically more sensitive to the emissions of HNO3 precursors.

[1]  A. Nenes,et al.  The influence of chemical composition, aerosol acidity, and metal dissolution on the oxidative potential of fine particulate matter and redox potential of the lung lining fluid , 2021, Environment international.

[2]  A. Russell,et al.  Aerosol acidity and liquid water content regulate the dry deposition of inorganic reactive nitrogen , 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[3]  J. Davison,et al.  Underestimated Ammonia Emissions from Road Vehicles. , 2020, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  A. Nenes,et al.  The Acidity of Atmospheric Particles and Clouds. , 2020, Atmospheric chemistry and physics.

[5]  A. Russell,et al.  Aerosol pH and liquid water content determine when particulate matter is sensitive to ammonia and nitrate availability , 2019, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[6]  A. Nenes,et al.  Effects of Water-soluble Organic Carbon on Aerosol pH , 2019, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[7]  J. Murphy,et al.  The sensitivity of PM2.5 acidity to meteorological parameters and chemical composition changes: 10-year records from six Canadian monitoring sites , 2019, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[8]  A. Russell,et al.  Understanding nitrate formation in a world with less sulfate , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[9]  A. Russell,et al.  Linked Response of Aerosol Acidity and Ammonia to SO2 and NO x Emissions Reductions in the United States. , 2018, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  M. McElroy,et al.  Fine-particle pH for Beijing winter haze as inferred from different thermodynamic equilibrium models , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[11]  C. Hennigan,et al.  Effect of the Urban Heat Island on Aerosol pH. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  A. Nenes,et al.  High levels of ammonia do not raise fine particle pH sufficiently to yield nitrogen oxide-dominated sulfate production , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[13]  A. Nenes,et al.  Highly Acidic Ambient Particles, Soluble Metals, and Oxidative Potential: A Link between Sulfate and Aerosol Toxicity. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  A. Nenes,et al.  Particle water and pH in the eastern Mediterranean: source variability and implications for nutrient availability , 2015 .

[15]  A. Nenes,et al.  A critical evaluation of proxy methods used to estimate the acidity of atmospheric particles , 2014 .

[16]  J. R. Hite,et al.  Fine-particle water and pH in the southeastern United States , 2014 .

[17]  Claire C. Austin,et al.  Canadian National Air Pollution Surveillance (NAPS) PM2.5 speciation program: Methodology and PM2.5 chemical composition for the years 2003–2008 , 2011 .

[18]  Robin L. Dennis,et al.  Observable indicators of the sensitivity of PM2.5 nitrate to emission reductions—Part I: Derivation of the adjusted gas ratio and applicability at regulatory-relevant time scales , 2008 .

[19]  A. Nenes,et al.  ISORROPIA II: a computationally efficient thermodynamic equilibrium model for K + –Ca 2+ –Mg 2+ –NH 4 + –Na + –SO 4 2− –NO 3 − –Cl − –H 2 O aerosols , 2007 .

[20]  Peter J Adams,et al.  Ammonia emission controls as a cost-effective strategy for reducing atmospheric particulate matter in the Eastern United States. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  W. Malm,et al.  Loss of Fine Particle Ammonium from Denuded Nylon Filters , 2006 .

[22]  Erik Swietlicki,et al.  Organic aerosol and global climate modelling: a review , 2004 .

[23]  Petros Koutrakis,et al.  Method Comparisons for Particulate Nitrate, Elemental Carbon, and PM2.5 Mass in Seven U.S. Cities , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.