Biotic interactions boost spatial models of species richness

Academy of Finland (Project Number 1140873) and Research Foundation of the University of Helsinki.

[1]  Miska Luoto,et al.  Outcomes of biotic interactions are dependent on multiple environmental variables , 2014 .

[2]  Miska Luoto,et al.  Incorporating dominant species as proxies for biotic interactions strengthens plant community models , 2014 .

[3]  J. Calabrese,et al.  Stacking species distribution models and adjusting bias by linking them to macroecological models , 2014 .

[4]  Miska Luoto,et al.  Soil moisture's underestimated role in climate change impact modelling in low‐energy systems , 2013, Global change biology.

[5]  M. Luoto,et al.  Geomorphological disturbance is necessary for predicting fine‐scale species distributions , 2013 .

[6]  J. Biesmeijer,et al.  Improving species distribution models using biotic interactions: a case study of parasites, pollinators and plants , 2013 .

[7]  John-Arvid Grytnes,et al.  Local temperatures inferred from plant communities suggest strong spatial buffering of climate warming across Northern Europe , 2013, Global change biology.

[8]  R. Ejrnæs,et al.  Mammal predator and prey species richness are strongly linked at macroscales. , 2013, Ecology.

[9]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  A road map for integrating eco-evolutionary processes into biodiversity models. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[10]  P. Valdes,et al.  Climate envelope models suggest spatio-temporal co-occurrence of refugia of African birds and mammals , 2013 .

[11]  Miska Luoto,et al.  Horizontal, but not vertical, biotic interactions affect fine-scale plant distribution patterns in a low-energy system. , 2013, Ecology.

[12]  P. Marquet,et al.  Comparing the relative contributions of biotic and abiotic factors as mediators of species’ distributions , 2013 .

[13]  W. D. Kissling,et al.  The role of biotic interactions in shaping distributions and realised assemblages of species: implications for species distribution modelling , 2012, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[14]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  The accuracy of plant assemblage prediction from species distribution models varies along environmental gradients , 2013 .

[15]  Carsten F. Dormann,et al.  Towards novel approaches to modelling biotic interactions in multispecies assemblages at large spatial extents , 2012 .

[16]  M. Luoto,et al.  Biotic interactions affect the elevational ranges of high‐latitude plant species , 2012 .

[17]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  Invasive species distribution models – how violating the equilibrium assumption can create new insights , 2012 .

[18]  R. Hijmans,et al.  Cross-validation of species distribution models: removing spatial sorting bias and calibration with a null model. , 2012, Ecology.

[19]  M. Pärtel,et al.  Ecological assembly rules in plant communities—approaches, patterns and prospects , 2012, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[20]  Miska Luoto,et al.  The meso-scale drivers of temperature extremes in high-latitude Fennoscandia , 2012, Climate Dynamics.

[21]  A. Guisan,et al.  Predicting spatial patterns of plant species richness: a comparison of direct macroecological and species stacking modelling approaches , 2011 .

[22]  J. Oksanen,et al.  Impact of shrub canopies on understorey vegetation in western Eurasian tundra , 2011 .

[23]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  SESAM – a new framework integrating macroecological and species distribution models for predicting spatio‐temporal patterns of species assemblages , 2011 .

[24]  S. Wood.  Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models , 2011 .

[25]  M. Luoto,et al.  Inclusion of local environmental conditions alters high-latitude vegetation change predictions based on bioclimatic models , 2011, Polar Biology.

[26]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Species distribution models reveal apparent competitive and facilitative effects of a dominant species on the distribution of tundra plants , 2010 .

[27]  M. Araújo,et al.  Biotic and abiotic variables show little redundancy in explaining tree species distributions , 2010 .

[28]  H. Birks,et al.  Recent vegetation changes at the high‐latitude tree line ecotone are controlled by geomorphological disturbance, productivity and diversity , 2010 .

[29]  Otso Ovaskainen,et al.  Modeling species co-occurrence by multivariate logistic regression generates new hypotheses on fungal interactions. , 2010, Ecology.

[30]  R. Aerts.  Nitrogen‐dependent recovery of subarctic tundra vegetation after simulation of extreme winter warming damage to Empetrum hermaphroditum , 2010 .

[31]  Gary R. Graves,et al.  Macroecological signals of species interactions in the Danish avifauna , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Climatic extremes improve predictions of spatial patterns of tree species , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Tim Newbold,et al.  Climate‐based models of spatial patterns of species richness in Egypt’s butterfly and mammal fauna , 2009 .

[34]  Walter Jetz,et al.  Patterns and causes of species richness: a general simulation model for macroecology. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[35]  A. Eskelinen,et al.  Links between plant community composition, soil organic matter quality and microbial communities in contrasting tundra habitats , 2009, Oecologia.

[36]  M. Kearney,et al.  Mechanistic niche modelling: combining physiological and spatial data to predict species' ranges. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[37]  J. Elith,et al.  Do they? How do they? WHY do they differ? On finding reasons for differing performances of species distribution models , 2009 .

[38]  Eric Young,et al.  Predicting the future of species diversity: macroecological theory, climate change, and direct tests of alternative forecasting methods , 2009 .

[39]  Richard Field,et al.  Spatial species‐richness gradients across scales: a meta‐analysis , 2009 .

[40]  J Elith,et al.  A working guide to boosted regression trees. , 2008, The Journal of animal ecology.

[41]  R. Callaway,et al.  Positive interactions among plants , 1995, The Botanical Review.

[42]  M. Araújo,et al.  The importance of biotic interactions for modelling species distributions under climate change , 2007 .

[43]  M. Luoto,et al.  Biotic interactions improve prediction of boreal bird distributions at macro‐scales , 2007 .

[44]  Mark New,et al.  Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[45]  Carsten Rahbek,et al.  Predicting continental-scale patterns of bird species richness with spatially explicit models , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[46]  M. Sykes,et al.  Methods and uncertainties in bioclimatic envelope modelling under climate change , 2006 .

[47]  E. Baack,et al.  Ecological factors limiting the distribution of Gilia tricolor in a California grassland mosaic. , 2006, Ecology.

[48]  R. Cowling,et al.  Predicting patterns of plant species richness in megadiverse South Africa , 2006 .

[49]  M. Araújo,et al.  Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling , 2006 .

[50]  V. Razzhivin,et al.  Broad-scale vegetation-environment relationships in Eurasian high-latitude areas , 2006 .

[51]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Spatial modelling of biodiversity at the community level , 2006 .

[52]  E. Heegaard,et al.  Species richness of vascular plants, bryophytes, and lichens along an altitudinal gradient in western Norway , 2006 .

[53]  W. Thuiller,et al.  Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[54]  T. Dawson,et al.  Selecting thresholds of occurrence in the prediction of species distributions , 2005 .

[55]  G. Graves,et al.  Source pool geometry and the assembly of continental avifaunas , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[56]  A. Peterson,et al.  INTERPRETATION OF MODELS OF FUNDAMENTAL ECOLOGICAL NICHES AND SPECIES' DISTRIBUTIONAL AREAS , 2005 .

[57]  M. McPeek,et al.  The community context of species' borders: ecological and evolutionary perspectives , 2005 .

[58]  C. Lortie,et al.  Rethinking plant community theory , 2004 .

[59]  T. Dawson,et al.  Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? , 2003 .

[60]  Caren C. Dymond,et al.  Mapping vegetation spatial patterns from modeled water, temperature and solar radiation gradients , 2002 .

[61]  T. Dawson,et al.  SPECIES: A Spatial Evaluation of Climate Impact on the Envelope of Species , 2002 .

[62]  Dylan Keon,et al.  Equations for potential annual direct incident radiation and heat load , 2002 .

[63]  Robert P. Anderson,et al.  Using niche-based GIS modeling to test geographic predictions of competitive exclusion and competitive release in South American pocket mice , 2002 .

[64]  J. Silvertown,et al.  Community assembly from the local species pool: an experimental study using congeneric species pairs , 2002 .

[65]  Terry V. Callaghan,et al.  Global change and arctic ecosystems: is lichen decline a function of increases in vascular plant biomass? , 2001 .

[66]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology , 2000 .

[67]  K. Gaston.  Global patterns in biodiversity , 2000, Nature.

[68]  A. Michelsen,et al.  Nordic Empetrum dominated ecosystems: function and susceptibility to environmental changes. , 2000 .

[69]  R. Aerts.  Interspecific competition in natural plant communities: mechanisms, trade-offs and plant-soil feedbacks , 1999 .

[70]  J. Lawton,et al.  Individualistic species responses invalidate simple physiological models of community dynamics under global environmental change , 1998 .

[71]  John Bell,et al.  A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models , 1997, Environmental Conservation.

[72]  E. Haukioja,et al.  Growth and Reproduction of Dwarf Shrubs in a Subarctic Plant Community: Annual Variation and Above-Ground Interactions with Neighbours , 1995 .

[73]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  Species borders: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[74]  K. Beven,et al.  A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology , 1979 .

[75]  Harold A. Mooney,et al.  THE ECOLOGY OF ARCTIC AND ALPINE PLANTS , 1968 .