Social relationships and information dissemination in virtual social network systems: An attachment theory perspective

Web-based communication via social networking sites has become an integral method of communication, raising the question of whether the well-established Attachment Theory remains applicable to modern relationships. This communication shift is also likely to affect the information dissemination dynamic; i.e., how internal attachment working models relate to virtual modes of communication. Three studies (354 participants in total, median age 27) examined the applicability of Attachment Theory to web-based social network communications. Using self- report measures (Study 1) and an experimental simulation (Study 2), the results indicate that attachment security level predicts an individual's number of social ties and willingness to initiate web-based relationships. Secure individuals emerged as best situated to become social hubs. Study 3 reveals that a decrease in avoidance scores predicts an increased willingness to deliver information to others. Anxious participants exhibited less willingness to deliver highly threatening information but more willingness to deliver neutral information to others. These findings support the applicability of attachment internal working models to predicting web-based social network communication, and suggest that Attachment Theory can be a predictor of the dynamics of web-based dissemination of information.

[1]  M. Houser,et al.  Extending the four-category model of adult attachment: An interpersonal model of friendship attachment , 2010 .

[2]  W. Furman Working Models of Friendships , 2001 .

[3]  R. Bufford,et al.  Psychologists’ attitudes and ethical concerns regarding the use of social networking web sites. , 2010 .

[4]  P. Shaver,et al.  The pushes and pulls of close relationships: attachment insecurities and relational ambivalence. , 2010, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  Eileen Wood,et al.  Exploring similarities and differences between online and offline friendships: The role of attachment style , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  Teresa Correa,et al.  Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users' personality and social media use , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[7]  P. Shaver,et al.  Attachment in Adulthood: Structure, Dynamics, and Change , 2007 .

[8]  J. Bowlby The making & breaking of affectional bonds , 1979 .

[9]  Gráinne M. Fitzsimons,et al.  Automatic Activation of Attachment-Related Goals , 2006, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[10]  G. Neimeyer,et al.  Attachment as a predictor of friendship qualities in college youth , 2005 .

[11]  J. Allen The attachment system in adolescence. , 2008 .

[12]  John Bowlby,et al.  Separation: Anxiety and Anger , 1973 .

[13]  C. Fagundes,et al.  Developmental perspectives on links between attachment and affect regulation over the lifespan. , 2008, Advances in child development and behavior.

[14]  Michael J. Stern,et al.  HOW LOCALITY, FREQUENCY OF COMMUNICATION AND INTERNET USAGE AFFECT MODES OF COMMUNICATION WITHIN CORE SOCIAL NETWORKS , 2008 .

[15]  Kelly A. Brennan,et al.  Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. , 1998 .

[16]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  The internet and social life. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[17]  Glenn I. Roisman,et al.  The role of adult attachment security in non-romantic, non-attachment-related first interactions between same-sex strangers , 2006, Attachment & human development.

[18]  Kenneth H. Rubin,et al.  Attachment, social information processing, and friendship quality of early adolescent girls and boys , 2010, Journal of social and personal relationships.

[19]  J. Cassidy,et al.  The generalization of attachment representations to new social situations: predicting behavior during initial interactions with strangers. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  James H. Liu,et al.  Working models of romantic attachment and the subjective quality of social interactions across relational contexts , 2006 .

[21]  Judith A. Feeney,et al.  Adult romantic attachment: Developments in the study of couple relationships. , 2008 .

[22]  Mario Mikulincer,et al.  Attachment working models and the sense of trust : An exploration of interaction goals and affect regulation , 1998 .

[23]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[24]  Nancy L. Collins,et al.  Attachment styles and internal working models of self and relationship partners. , 1996 .

[25]  W. Furman,et al.  Parent—adolescent relationship qualities, internal working models, and attachment styles as predictors of adolescents’ interactions with friends , 2009 .

[26]  J. de Houwer,et al.  Proximity and distance goals in adult attachment , 2008 .

[27]  Katharina Burger,et al.  A Secure Base Clinical Applications Of Attachment Theory , 2016 .

[28]  Phillip R. Shaver,et al.  Handbook of attachment : theory, research, and clinical applications , 1999 .

[29]  Jude Cassidy,et al.  Avoidance and its relation to other defensive processes. , 1988 .

[30]  P. Zimmermann Attachment representations and characteristics of friendship relations during adolescence. , 2004, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[31]  J. Sinacore Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions , 1993 .

[32]  R. Kobak,et al.  Psychophysiology in attachment interviews: converging evidence for deactivating strategies. , 1992, Child development.

[33]  Vassilis Saroglou,et al.  Values and religiosity: A meta-analysis of studies using Schwartz's model , 2004 .

[34]  Craig Ross,et al.  Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[35]  Yair Amichai-Hamburger,et al.  Social network use and personality , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[36]  Z. Shechtman,et al.  Attachment Style and Observed Initial Self-Disclosure as Explanatory Variables of Group Functioning. , 2004 .

[37]  Leman Pinar Tosun,et al.  Does Internet use reflect your personality? Relationship between Eysenck's personality dimensions and Internet use , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[38]  J. Cassidy,et al.  The influence of early attachments on other relationships. , 2008 .