Multimedia Appendix 1

Table S1: Missing user analysis. Active social network app users have a higher burden of anxiety, stress, and trauma-related disorder diagnoses. Data represent N and percentage of available diagnoses unless otherwise specified, between missing or inconsistent users (social network app; n=100, communication app; n=68), i.e. time logged are either fewer than 22 days during the 44 days of the pre-lockdown period, or fewer than 26 days during the 51-days of lockdown period, and active users (social network app; n=42, communication app; n=74, greater than 22 days in pre-lockdown and greater than 26 days in lockdown). Psychiatric diagnosis categories are not mutually exclusive. Statistically significant differences between the clinical anxiety and nonclinical anxiety groups were obtained by two-sided t-test for age, GAD-7; two-sided z-test for gender, cohabitation status, coronavirus exposure risk items, and diagnosis; chi-square independence test for all other categorical variables. Pairwise nominal independence test shows that the significance in chi-square test in employment status variable is driven by an employee, student, or homemaker ~ unemployed without benefits and ~ retired, P=.05, .03 respectively).

[1]  Reed M. Gardner,et al.  White Paper: Designing Medical Informatics Research and Library-Resource Projects to Increase What Is Learned , 1994, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[2]  R. Wootton,et al.  What constitutes success in telehealth? , 2001, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[3]  R. Wootton,et al.  Recent advances: Telemedicine. , 2001, BMJ.

[4]  Vincenzo Della Mea,et al.  What is e-Health (2): The death of telemedicine? , 2001, Journal of medical Internet research.

[5]  Bonnie Kaplan,et al.  Evaluating informatics applications - some alternative approaches: theory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism , 2001, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[6]  Bonnie Kaplan,et al.  Evaluating informatics applications - clinical decision support systems literature review , 2001, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[7]  T. Eng,et al.  eHealth Research and Evaluation: Challenges and Opportunities , 2002, Journal of health communication.

[8]  James Hereford,et al.  Patients, physicians, and the Internet. , 2002, Managed care quarterly.

[9]  T. Bodenheimer,et al.  Electronic technology: a spark to revitalize primary care? , 2003, JAMA.

[10]  Elske Ammenwerth,et al.  Evaluation of health information systems - problems and challenges , 2003, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[11]  Roberto J. Rodrigues,et al.  Opportunities and challenges in the deployment of global e-health , 2003 .

[12]  Paul Wallace,et al.  Understanding the normalization of telemedicine services through qualitative evaluation. , 2003, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[13]  Jeremy C Wyatt,et al.  Evaluation of ehealth systems and services , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  J. Kahan,et al.  What Is eHealth (4): A Scoping Exercise to Map the Field , 2005, Journal of medical Internet research.

[15]  Graham Wright,et al.  A fatal case of bupropion (Zyban) hepatotoxicity with autoimmune features: Case report , 2005, Journal of medical case reports.

[16]  J. Grigsby,et al.  The evaluation of telemedicine and health services research. , 2005, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[17]  Paul Taylor,et al.  Evaluating telemedicine systems and services , 2005, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[18]  N. Hjelm,et al.  Benefits and drawbacks of telemedicine , 2005, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[19]  J. Wyatt,et al.  eHealth and the future: promise or peril? , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[20]  Leanne M. Currie,et al.  Evaluation frameworks for nursing informatics , 2005, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[21]  George Demiris,et al.  An analysis of the specialized literature in the field of telemedicine. , 2005, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[22]  Marie-Pierre Gagnon,et al.  Striving for evidence in e-health evaluation: Lessons from health technology assessment , 2005, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[23]  A. Jadad,et al.  What Is eHealth (3): A Systematic Review of Published Definitions , 2005, Journal of medical Internet research.

[24]  Josipa Kern,et al.  Evaluation of teleconsultation systems , 2006, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[25]  K. Rheuban The role of telemedicine in fostering health-care innovations to address problems of access, specialty shortages and changing patient care needs , 2006, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[26]  Michael Rigby,et al.  Essential prerequisites to the safe and effective widespread roll-out of e-working in healthcare , 2006, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[27]  D. Ahern,et al.  What Is eHealth (6): Perspectives on the Evolution of eHealth Research , 2006, Journal of medical Internet research.

[28]  G. Doolittle,et al.  Defining the needs of a telemedicine service , 2006, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[29]  F. Griffiths,et al.  Why Are Health Care Interventions Delivered Over the Internet? A Systematic Review of the Published Literature , 2006, Journal of medical Internet research.

[30]  David K Ahern,et al.  Challenges and opportunities of eHealth research. , 2007, American journal of preventive medicine.

[31]  Russell E Glasgow,et al.  eHealth evaluation and dissemination research. , 2007, American journal of preventive medicine.

[32]  David B Abrams,et al.  Critical issues in eHealth research. , 2007, American journal of preventive medicine.

[33]  Bonnie Kaplan,et al.  Expanding multi-disciplinary approaches to healthcare information technologies: What does information systems offer medical informatics? , 2007, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[34]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  eHealth research from the user's perspective. , 2007, American journal of preventive medicine.

[35]  Gunther Eysenbach,et al.  Poverty, Human Development, and the Role of eHealth , 2007, Journal of medical Internet research.

[36]  J. Øvretveit,et al.  Improving quality through effective implementation of information technology in healthcare. , 2007, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[37]  Tom H. F. Broens,et al.  Determinants of successful telemedicine implementations: a literature study , 2007, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[38]  M. Pringle,et al.  Evaluating eHealth: How to Make Evaluation More Methodologically Robust , 2009, PLoS medicine.

[39]  David W. Bates,et al.  Evaluating eHealth: Undertaking Robust International Cross-Cultural eHealth Research , 2009, PLoS medicine.

[40]  Thad A Polk,et al.  Methodologic and design issues in patient-centered e-health research. , 2010, American journal of preventive medicine.

[41]  David H Gustafson,et al.  E-health research and patient-centered care examining theory, methods, and application. , 2010, American journal of preventive medicine.