Review of Research on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator

Research on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator as a psychometric instrument and as a reflection of Jung's personality typology was reviewed. Its applications in education, business, the artistic world, and in decision-making processes of business have been extensive and well received.

[1]  J. Wheelwright,et al.  Jung's psychological types, their frequency of occurrence. , 1946, The Journal of general psychology.

[2]  H. Gray Jung's psychological types meaning and consistency of the questionnaire. , 1947, The Journal of general psychology.

[3]  H. Gray Jung's psychological types, ambiguous scores and their interpretation. , 1949, The Journal of general psychology.

[4]  J. Ross,et al.  Intercorrelations and Reliability of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Scales , 1963 .

[5]  J. Ross,et al.  Some Correlates of a Jungian Personality Inventory , 1964 .

[6]  The Sixth Mental Measurements Yearbook , 1966 .

[7]  G. A. Mendelsohn Effects of Client Personality and Client-Counselor Similarity on the Duration of Counseling: A Replication and Extension1 , 1966 .

[8]  M. Goldschmid Prediction of college majors by personality tests. , 1967 .

[9]  O. K. Buros,et al.  The sixth mental measurements yearbook , 1966 .

[10]  H. G. Richek Note on Intercorrelations of Scales of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 1969, Psychological reports.

[11]  R. Reynolds,et al.  Typology as a Moderating Variable in Success in Science , 1970 .

[12]  K. H. Lu,et al.  Statistical Control of "Impurity" in the Estimation of Test Reliability , 1971 .

[13]  R. Carlson,et al.  Personality Types among Negro College Students , 1972 .

[14]  Intro-extra-version as an organizing principle in fantasy production. , 1972, The Journal of analytical psychology.

[15]  PERSONALITY STABILITY AND CHANGE AMONG MINISTERIAL STUDENTS , 1972 .

[16]  K. Jamison,et al.  Drug usage, personality, attitudinal, and behavioral correlates of driving behavior. , 1973, The Journal of psychology.

[17]  N. Levy,et al.  Studies of Jungian typology. I. Memory, social perception, and social action. , 1973, Journal of personality.

[18]  Ralph H. Kilmann,et al.  A Contingency Approach to Laboratory Learning: Psychological Types Versus Experiential Norms , 1974 .

[19]  J. Cooper,et al.  Dissonance produced by deviations from life styles: the interaction of Jungian typology and conformity. , 1974, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  R. Kilmann,et al.  Towards A Systemic Methodology For Evaluating The Impact Of Interventions On Organizational Effectiveness , 1976 .

[21]  R. S. Steele,et al.  Eysenck Personality Questionnaire and Jungian Myers-Briggs Type Indicator correlation of extraversion-introversion. , 1976, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[22]  M. Carlyn,et al.  An assessment of the Myers-Briggs Type indicator. , 1977, Journal of personality assessment.

[23]  T. Carskadon,et al.  Test-Retest Reliabilities of Continuous Scores on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 1977 .

[24]  M. J. Patton,et al.  The Effectiveness of a Study Skills Course For Students of Different Personality Types. , 1977 .

[25]  J. S. Witzig Jung's typology and classification of the psychotherapies. , 1978, The Journal of analytical psychology.

[26]  O. K. Buros,et al.  The eighth mental measurements yearbook , 1978 .

[27]  J. Bruhn,et al.  Correlations of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator with other Personality and Achievement Variables , 1978 .

[28]  Relationship between Certain Circadian Behavior Patterns and Jungian Personality Types , 1979 .

[29]  Ray W. Johnson,et al.  Self-Descriptive Adjectives Associated with a Jungian Personality Inventory , 1979 .

[30]  J. C. Henderson,et al.  The Influence of Decision Style on Decision Making Behavior , 1980 .

[31]  R. Carlson Studies of Jungian typology: II. Representations of the personal world. , 1980 .

[32]  M. Cohen,et al.  A Construct Validity Study of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 1981 .

[33]  Nickolaus R. Feimer,et al.  Conceptual and empirical analysis of the typological implications of patterns of socialization and femininity. , 1982 .

[34]  D. Ozer,et al.  Two types of psychologists: Remarks on the Mendelsohn, Weiss, and Feimer contribution. , 1982 .

[35]  A. Padilla,et al.  A Spanish Translation of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Form G , 1982 .

[36]  R. Helson Critics and their texts: An approach to Jung's theory of cognition and personality. , 1982 .

[37]  Nickolaus R. Feimer,et al.  Reply to the comments of Block and Ozer. , 1982 .

[38]  Mardy S. Ireland,et al.  Pattern Analysis of Recorded Daydreams, Memories, and Personality Type , 1983 .

[39]  James W. Pinkney The Myers‐Briggs Type Indicator as an Alternative in Career Counseling , 1983 .

[40]  E. Lusk,et al.  Relation of Scores on Group Embedded Figures Test and Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 1983 .

[41]  Studies of Jungian typology: III. Personality and marriage. , 1984, Journal of personality assessment.

[42]  A. Roberts,et al.  Jungian Personality Types as a Predictor of Attendance at the Black College Day March , 1984 .

[43]  Janice Mill,et al.  High and low self‐monitoring individuals: Their decoding skills and empathic expression , 1984 .

[44]  O C Tzeng,et al.  Item validity of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. , 1984, Journal of personality assessment.

[45]  Diurnal Changes on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: A Pilot Study , 1984 .

[46]  Conceptual and Empirical Analysis of Some Assumptions of an Explicitly Typological Theory , 1984 .

[47]  Arkalgud Ramaprasad,et al.  On formulating strategic problems , 1984 .

[48]  C. R. Thomas Regression of Myers-Briggs Type Scales , 1984 .

[49]  Ann Q. Lynch The Myers‐Briggs Type Indicator: A Tool for Appreciating Employee and Client Diversity , 1985 .

[50]  R. Goldsmith Sensation Seeking and the Sensing-Intuition Scale of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 1985 .

[51]  Michael Lyons The DP psyche , 1985 .

[52]  Larry A. Smith,et al.  Conflict-Handling and Personality Dimensions of Project-Management Personnel , 1985 .

[53]  I. B. Myers Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 1985 .

[54]  R A Kreienkamp,et al.  Similarity of Personalities of Flight Instructors and Student-Pilots: Effect on Flight Training Time , 1985, Psychological reports.

[55]  Ralph A. Alexander,et al.  Item Analysis of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 1985 .

[56]  J. G. Carlson Recent assessments of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. , 1985, Journal of personality assessment.

[57]  E. Loftus,et al.  Eyewitness performance in different psychological types. , 1985, The Journal of general psychology.

[58]  B. Thompson,et al.  Construct Validity of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 1986 .

[59]  Jane A. Taylor,et al.  Jungian Typology of Professional Psychodramatists: Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Analysis of Certified Psychodramatists , 1986, Psychological reports.

[60]  D. Donderi,et al.  Jungian personality typology and the recall of everyday and archetypal dreams. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[61]  Applications of Jungian Type Theory to Counselor Education , 1987 .

[62]  R. Alexander,et al.  The Multifactorial Nature of Extraversion-Introversion in the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and Eysenck Personality Inventory , 1987 .

[63]  C. P. Schmidt,et al.  Reexamination of Relations between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and Field Dependence-Independence , 1988, Perceptual and Motor Skills.

[64]  Raymond Moody,et al.  Personality Preferences and Foreign Language Learning , 1988 .

[65]  Correlations among the Group Embedded Figures Test, the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and Demographic Characteristics: A Business School Study , 1988 .

[66]  G. Sipps,et al.  Convergent and Discriminant Validity of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator as a Measure of Sociability and Impulsivity , 1988 .

[67]  K. Schurr,et al.  Relationships of Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Personality Characteristics and Self-Reported Academic Problems and Skill Ratings with Scholastic Aptitude Test Scores , 1988 .

[68]  John G. Carlson,et al.  Affirmative: In Support of Researching the Myers‐Briggs Type Indicator , 1989 .

[69]  David A. Cowan An Alternative to the Dichotomous Interpretation of Jung's Psychological Functions: Developing More Sensitive Measurement Technology , 1989 .

[70]  Negative: The MBTI: Not Ready for Routine Use in Counseling. , 1989 .

[71]  P. Costa,et al.  Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. , 1989, Journal of personality.