Experience API: Flexible, Decentralized and Activity-Centric Data Collection

AbstractThis emerging technology report describes the Experience API (xAPI), a new e-learning specification designed to support the learning community in standardizing and collecting both formal and informal distributed learning activities. Informed by Activity Theory, a framework aligned with constructivism, data is collected in the form of activity statements with the flexibility to describe a wide array of learning experiences from museum exhibits to learning environment interactions. Fast adoption by private sector tool developers and the majority of learning management systems used in academia suggests the specification may have long-term implications. This report summarizes major educational research opportunities and key challenges to implementation.

[1]  Fridolin Wild,et al.  Creating awareness of kinaesthetic learning using the Experience API: current practices, emerging challenges, possible solutions , 2014, ARTEL@EC-TEL.

[2]  Y. Engeström.  Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. , 2001 .

[3]  Hendrik Drachsler,et al.  Confidence in Learning Analytics , 2012 .

[4]  Maeve Duggan,et al.  Social Media Update 2016 , 2016 .

[5]  Paul Prinsloo,et al.  An evaluation of policy frameworks for addressing ethical considerations in learning analytics , 2013, LAK '13.

[6]  Erik Duval,et al.  Dataset-Driven Research to Support Learning and Knowledge Analytics , 2012, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[7]  D. Jonassen,et al.  Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments , 1999 .

[8]  Mandy Lupton,et al.  Learning analytics beyond the LMS: the connected learning analytics toolkit , 2015, LAK.

[9]  Mark William Johnson,et al.  Personal Learning Environments: Challenging the Dominant Design of Educational Systems , 2006, EC-TEL Workshops.

[10]  L. Vygotsky.  Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[11]  William R. Watson,et al.  An Argument for Clarity: What are Learning Management Systems, What are They Not, and What Should They Become? , 2007 .

[12]  Martin V. Butz,et al.  Advanced Distributed Learning , 2012 .

[13]  Fridolin Wild,et al.  Designing for Change: Mash-Up Personal Learning Environments , 2008 .

[14]  Daisy Mwanza,et al.  Managing content in e-learning environments , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[15]  Katja Niemann,et al.  Contextualized attention metadata , 2011 .

[16]  Cher Ping Lim.  A theoretical framework for the study of ICT in schools: a proposal , 2002, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[17]  Maryam Alavi.  Distributed learning environments , 2004, Computer.

[18]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  A unified framework for multi-level analysis of distributed learning , 2011, LAK.

[19]  B. Nardi.  Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction , 1995 .

[20]  Liz Glowa.  Re-Engineering Information Technology: Design Considerations for Competency Education. CompetencyWorks Issue Brief. , 2013 .

[21]  Hoisoo Kim,et al.  Effects of learning Strategy, Metacognition and Steps of Multimedia Application on Achievement and Learning Attitude in a Didactic Classroom Teaching , 1999 .

[22]  Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al.  Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics: Applications to Constructionist Research , 2014, Technology, Knowledge and Learning.

[23]  Patricia A. Book,et al.  All Hands on Deck: Ten Lessons from Early Adopters of Competency-Based Education. , 2014 .

[24]  Christian Glahn,et al.  Using the ADL Experience API for Mobile Learning, Sensing, Informing, Encouraging, Orchestrating , 2013, 2013 Seventh International Conference on Next Generation Mobile Apps, Services and Technologies.

[25]  Jan Herrington,et al.  The case studies: authentic learning , 2014 .

[26]  K. Kuutti.  Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research , 1995 .