A methodology to assess the profitability of Bt-cotton: case study results from the state of Karnataka, India

Abstract Bt-cotton varieties can control lepidopterous pests, hence offering the possibility to reduce chemical pesticide use. India, with the largest cotton-growing area globally, gave commercial approval for Bt cotton in 2002 and a rapid adoption of the technology is expected. This paper uses a stochastic partial budgeting approach that captures the key pest control properties of Bt cotton taking into account uncertainty of pest pressure, control effectiveness and prices to assess the profitability effects of Bt varieties and hence complements previous studies that generally excluded such issues. Results of the simulation model reveal that under the current price situation a prophylactic chemical control strategy dominates the use of Bt varieties in both, irrigated and non-irrigated cotton. The effect of a higher cotton price is assessed in a second scenario that depicts a Bt cotton variety with improved fiber quality than varieties currently approved for commercial planting. Under this assumption, the Bt strategy would be slightly better than the prophylactic use of chemical pesticides. The model can be extended to include pests other than the bollworm and correlations among variables, e.g. prices and yield, provided sufficient evidence for such correlation exists. Results of this analysis show the impact of uncertainty in the main variables that influence the profitability of Bt cotton and alternative crop protection methods.

[1]  Scott Rozelle,et al.  Five years of Bt cotton in China - the benefits continue. , 2002, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[2]  Kongming Wu,et al.  Efficacy of transgenic cotton containing a cry1Ac gene from Bacillus thuringiensis against Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in northern China. , 2003, Journal of economic entomology.

[3]  D. Cole,et al.  Pesticide Use and Farm Worker Health in Ecuadorian Potato Production , 1994 .

[4]  R. Huirne,et al.  Coping with Risk in Agriculture , 1997 .

[5]  J. Holloway,et al.  Larval Survival and Development of the Fall Armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on Normal and Transgenic Cotton Expressing the Bacillus Thuringiensis CryIA (c) δ-endotoxin , 1998 .

[6]  Fangbin Qiao,et al.  Biotechnology as an alternative to chemical pesticides: a case study of Bt cotton in China , 2003 .

[7]  Greg Traxler,et al.  Transgenic Cotton in Mexico: Economic and Environmental Impacts , 2002 .

[8]  R. Herdt,et al.  The economics of insect control on rice in the Philippines , 1984 .

[9]  J. Dillon,et al.  Agricultural Decision Analysis , 1977 .

[10]  Matin Qaim,et al.  Genetically Modified Crops, Corporate Pricing Strategies, and Farmers' Adoption: The Case of Bt Cotton in Argentina , 2003 .

[11]  Matin Qaim,et al.  Bt Cotton in India: Field Trial Results and Economic Projections , 2003 .

[12]  A. Shelton,et al.  Economic, ecological, food safety, and social consequences of the deployment of bt transgenic plants. , 2002, Annual review of entomology.

[13]  P. Pingali,et al.  Pesticides and Philippine Rice Farmer Health: A Medical and Economic Analysis , 1994 .

[14]  David Zilberman,et al.  Yield Effects of Genetically Modified Crops in Developing Countries , 2003, Science.

[15]  Prabhu Pingali,et al.  Pesticides, rice productivity, and farmers' health: an economic assessment. , 1993 .

[16]  Greg Traxler,et al.  Transgenic Cotton in Mexico , 2004 .