Radiomarking brood‐rearing mallard females: Implications for juvenile survival

Radiotelemetry is frequently used to measure habitat use, movements, and survival in birds; presumably, outfitting adult females with radiotransmitters does not influence juvenile survival, but this critical assumption is rarely tested. We evaluated whether the timing or type of transmitter deployed on adult female mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) reduced duckling survival estimates in the Canadian Prairie Pothole Region, 1993–1995. The best-approximating model suggests that, compared with 2 other trap–transmitter combinations, ducklings raised by mallard females trapped prior to nest initiation and outfitted with anchor–suture transmitters had poor survival. The 30-day survival rate of ducklings raised by female mallards equipped with anchor–suture transmitters prior to nest initiation was lower than survival of ducklings attended by females equipped prior to nest initiation with abdominally implanted transmitters or females marked during late incubation with anchor–suture transmitters. Studies of reproductive success deploying anchor–suture transmitters on female waterfowl trapped prior to nest initiation may have biased results because of possible negative consequences to offspring survival. © 2012 The Wildlife Society.

[1]  L. Armstrong,et al.  Landscape-level correlates of mallard duckling survival: Implications for conservation programs† , 2012 .

[2]  T. Arnold Uninformative Parameters and Model Selection Using Akaike's Information Criterion , 2010 .

[3]  Jeffrey D. Brawn,et al.  Meta‐analysis of transmitter effects on avian behaviour and ecology , 2010 .

[4]  B. Drolet,et al.  Effects of Backpack Radio-Transmitters on Female Barrow’s Goldeneyes , 2006 .

[5]  L. Armstrong,et al.  FACTORS AFFECTING SURVIVAL OF MALLARD DUCKLINGS IN SOUTHERN ONTARIO , 2004 .

[6]  R. Sayler,et al.  Brood ecology of mallards and gadwalls nesting on islands in large reservoirs , 1997 .

[7]  J. Devries,et al.  Effects of transmitters on reproduction and survival of wild mallards , 1997 .

[8]  J. Devries,et al.  Nesting effort by wild mallards with 3 types of radio transmitters , 1993 .

[9]  J. Lokemoen,et al.  Effects of harness transmitters on behavior and reproduction of wild mallards , 1993 .

[10]  J. Ratti,et al.  Mallard brood survival and wetland habitat conditions in southwestern Manitoba , 1992 .

[11]  F. J. Dein,et al.  Implanting radio transmitters in wintering canvasbacks , 1992 .

[12]  R. Jarvis,et al.  Attaching radio transmitters to 1-day-old mallard ducklings , 1991 .

[13]  J. Lokemoen,et al.  A Decoy Trap for Breeding-Season Mallards in North Dakota , 1987 .

[14]  C. Korschgen,et al.  Evaluation of implanted radio transmitters in ducks , 1984 .

[15]  R. Jarvis,et al.  Survival of Mallard Broods in South-Central North Dakota , 1983 .

[16]  M. W. Weller An Automatic Nest-Trap for Waterfowl , 1957 .

[17]  L. Armstrong,et al.  Mallard Nest-Site Selection in an Altered Environment: Predictions and Patterns , 2008 .

[18]  R. Clark,et al.  Survival of gadwall and mallard ducklings in southcentral Saskatchewan , 2002 .

[19]  E. B. Moser,et al.  Effects of backpack and implanted radiotransmitters on captive blue-winged teal , 2000 .

[20]  D. A. Brandt,et al.  Modified Transmitter Attachment Method for Adult Ducks , 1995 .

[21]  L. D. Flake,et al.  A walk-in trap for nesting ducks , 1994 .

[22]  D. L. Orthmeyer,et al.  Survival of Mallard broods in Benton Lake National Wildlife Refuge in north central Montana , 1990 .

[23]  T. J. Dwyer An adjustable radio-package for ducks , 1972 .

[24]  Malcolm W. Coulter A New Waterfowl Nest Trap , 1958 .