Do land surface models need to include differential plant species responses to drought? Examining model predictions across a mesic-xeric gradient in Europe

Abstract. Future climate change has the potential to increase drought in many regions of the globe, making it essential that land surface models (LSMs) used in coupled climate models realistically capture the drought responses of vegetation. Recent data syntheses show that drought sensitivity varies considerably among plants from different climate zones, but state-of-the-art LSMs currently assume the same drought sensitivity for all vegetation. We tested whether variable drought sensitivities are needed to explain the observed large-scale patterns of drought impact on the carbon, water and energy fluxes. We implemented data-driven drought sensitivities in the Community Atmosphere Biosphere Land Exchange (CABLE) LSM and evaluated alternative sensitivities across a latitudinal gradient in Europe during the 2003 heatwave. The model predicted an overly abrupt onset of drought unless average soil water potential was calculated with dynamic weighting across soil layers. We found that high drought sensitivity at the most mesic sites, and low drought sensitivity at the most xeric sites, was necessary to accurately model responses during drought. Our results indicate that LSMs will over-estimate drought impacts in drier climates unless different sensitivity of vegetation to drought is taken into account.

[1]  N. McDowell,et al.  Responses of two semiarid conifer tree species to reduced precipitation and warming reveal new perspectives for stomatal regulation. , 2016, Plant, cell & environment.

[2]  M. Decker.  Development and evaluation of a new soil moisture and runoff parameterization for the CABLE LSM including subgrid‐scale processes , 2015 .

[3]  Jordi Martínez-Vilalta,et al.  Coordination of physiological traits involved in drought-induced mortality of woody plants. , 2015, The New phytologist.

[4]  N. McDowell,et al.  Darcy's law predicts widespread forest mortality under climate warming , 2015 .

[5]  P. Dirmeyer,et al.  The Plumbing of Land Surface Models: Benchmarking Model Performance , 2015 .

[6]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Using ecosystem experiments to improve vegetation models , 2015 .

[7]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  Optimal stomatal behaviour around the world , 2015 .

[8]  T. Dawson,et al.  Predicting plant vulnerability to drought in biodiverse regions using functional traits , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  T. Klein.  The variability of stomatal sensitivity to leaf water potential across tree species indicates a continuum between isohydric and anisohydric behaviours , 2014 .

[10]  T. W. Davis,et al.  Biophsyical constraints on gross primary production by the terrestrial biosphere , 2014 .

[11]  S. Manzoni.  Integrating plant hydraulics and gas exchange along the drought-response trait spectrum. , 2014, Tree physiology.

[12]  I. Prentice,et al.  Short-term water stress impacts on stomatal, mesophyll and biochemical limitations to photosynthesis differ consistently among tree species from contrasting climates. , 2014, Tree physiology.

[13]  A. Pitman,et al.  A test of an optimal stomatal conductance scheme within the CABLE land surface model , 2014 .

[14]  K. Oleson,et al.  Modeling stomatal conductance in the earth system: linking leaf water-use efficiency and water transport along the soil–plant–atmosphere continuum , 2014 .

[15]  I. Prentice,et al.  Reliable, robust and realistic: the three R's of next-generation land-surface modelling , 2014 .

[16]  Meghan L. Avolio,et al.  Toward a better integration of biological data from precipitation manipulation experiments into Earth system models , 2014 .

[17]  Anne Verhoef,et al.  Modeling plant transpiration under limited soil water: Comparison of different plant and soil hydraulic parameterizations and preliminary implications for their use in land surface models , 2014 .

[18]  A. O'Grady,et al.  Co-ordination of growth, gas exchange and hydraulics define the carbon safety margin in tree species with contrasting drought strategies. , 2014, Tree physiology.

[19]  E. Kowalczyk,et al.  Representation of climate extreme indices in the ACCESS1.3b coupled atmosphere–land surface model , 2014 .

[20]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  How should we model plant responses to drought? An analysis of stomatal and non-stomatal responses to water stress , 2013 .

[21]  H. McCarthy,et al.  VIC+ for water‐limited conditions: A study of biological and hydrological processes and their interactions in soil‐plant‐atmosphere continuum , 2013 .

[22]  Yadvinder Malhi,et al.  Confronting model predictions of carbon fluxes with measurements of Amazon forests subjected to experimental drought. , 2013, The New phytologist.

[23]  Patrick J. Hudson,et al.  Regulation and acclimation of leaf gas exchange in a piñon-juniper woodland exposed to three different precipitation regimes. , 2013, Plant, cell & environment.

[24]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Forest water use and water use efficiency at elevated CO2: a model‐data intercomparison at two contrasting temperate forest FACE sites , 2013, Global change biology.

[25]  Ian N. Harman,et al.  The land surface model component of ACCESS: description and impact on the simulated surface climatology , 2013 .

[26]  F. Zwiers,et al.  Climate extremes indices in the CMIP5 multimodel ensemble: Part 1. Model evaluation in the present climate , 2013 .

[27]  D. White,et al.  Drought response strategies define the relative contributions of hydraulic dysfunction and carbohydrate depletion during tree mortality. , 2013, The New phytologist.

[28]  L. Anderegg,et al.  Consequences of widespread tree mortality triggered by drought and temperature stress , 2013 .

[29]  A. Dai.  Increasing drought under global warming in observations and models , 2013 .

[30]  Zong-Liang Yang,et al.  Technical description of version 4.5 of the Community Land Model (CLM) , 2013 .

[31]  Ying‐ping Wang,et al.  Improving the responses of the Australian community land surface model (CABLE) to seasonal drought , 2012 .

[32]  E. Wood,et al.  Little change in global drought over the past 60 years , 2012, Nature.

[33]  A. Nardini,et al.  Global convergence in the vulnerability of forests to drought , 2012, Nature.

[34]  J. Flexas,et al.  Mesophyll diffusion conductance to CO2: an unappreciated central player in photosynthesis. , 2012, Plant science : an international journal of experimental plant biology.

[35]  Gab Abramowitz,et al.  Towards a public, standardized, diagnostic benchmarking system for land surface models , 2012 .

[36]  N. McDowell,et al.  Methodology and performance of a rainfall manipulation experiment in a piñon–juniper woodland , 2012 .

[37]  Steven J. Phipps,et al.  Importance of background climate in determining impact of land-cover change on regional climate , 2011 .

[38]  C. Peng,et al.  A drought-induced pervasive increase in tree mortality across Canada's boreal forests , 2011 .

[39]  A. Verhoef,et al.  Towards an improved and more flexible representation of water stress in coupled photosynthesis-stomatal conductance models. , 2011 .

[40]  P. Cox,et al.  The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), model description – Part 2: Carbon fluxes and vegetation dynamics , 2011 .

[41]  Michael A. Forster,et al.  Rooting depth explains [CO2] x drought interaction in Eucalyptus saligna. , 2011, Tree physiology.

[42]  A. Pitman,et al.  Global and regional coupled climate sensitivity to the parameterization of rainfall interception , 2011 .

[43]  Paolo De Angelis,et al.  Reconciling the optimal and empirical approaches to modelling stomatal conductance , 2011 .

[44]  Amilcare Porporato,et al.  Optimizing stomatal conductance for maximum carbon gain under water stress: a meta-analysis across plant functional types and climates , 2011 .

[45]  Ray Leuning,et al.  Diagnosing errors in a land surface model (CABLE) in the time and frequency domains , 2011 .

[46]  O. Phillips,et al.  The 2010 Amazon Drought , 2011, Science.

[47]  Joanna M. Clark,et al.  Bioclimatic envelope model of climate change impacts on blanket peatland distribution in Great Britain , 2010 .

[48]  Stephen Sitch,et al.  Multiple mechanisms of Amazonian forest biomass losses in three dynamic global vegetation models under climate change. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[49]  V. Haverd,et al.  Soil-Litter-Iso: A one-dimensional model for coupled transport of heat, water and stable isotopes in soil with a litter layer and root extraction , 2010 .

[50]  Trevor F. Keenan,et al.  The importance of mesophyll conductance in regulating forest ecosystem productivity during drought periods , 2010 .

[51]  N. McDowell,et al.  A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests , 2010 .

[52]  A. Pitman,et al.  Can the stomatal response to higher atmospheric carbon dioxide explain the unusual temperatures during the 2002 Murray‐Darling Basin drought? , 2010 .

[53]  S. Zaehle,et al.  Improved understanding of drought controls on seasonal variation in Mediterranean forest canopy CO2 and water fluxes through combined in situ measurements and ecosystem modelling. , 2009 .

[54]  J. Terborgh,et al.  Drought Sensitivity of the Amazon Rainforest , 2009, Science.

[55]  Douglas Ward,et al.  Drought‐induced tree death in savanna , 2009 .

[56]  A. Taylor,et al.  Widespread Increase of Tree Mortality Rates in the Western United States , 2009, Science.

[57]  A. Pitman,et al.  Evaluating the Performance of Land Surface Models , 2008 .

[58]  W. Parton,et al.  Modelled effects of precipitation on ecosystem carbon and water dynamics in different climatic zones , 2008 .

[59]  N. McDowell,et al.  Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought? , 2008, The New phytologist.

[60]  A. Mäkelä,et al.  Predicting the decline in daily maximum transpiration rate of two pine stands during drought based on constant minimum leaf water potential and plant hydraulic conductance. , 2008, Tree physiology.

[61]  Y. Malhi,et al.  The response of an Eastern Amazonian rain forest to drought stress: results and modelling analyses from a throughfall exclusion experiment , 2007 .

[62]  D. Nepstad,et al.  Mortality of large trees and lianas following experimental drought in an Amazon forest. , 2007, Ecology.

[63]  Stephen P. Hubbell,et al.  Drought sensitivity shapes species distribution patterns in tropical forests , 2007, Nature.

[64]  John D. Hunter,et al.  Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment , 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[65]  J. Fisher,et al.  Nighttime transpiration in woody plants from contrasting ecosystems. , 2007, Tree physiology.

[66]  Markus Reichstein,et al.  Evidence for soil water control on carbon and water dynamics in European forests during the extremely dry year: 2003 , 2007 .

[67]  T. Vesala,et al.  Reduction of ecosystem productivity and respiration during the European summer 2003 climate anomaly: a joint flux tower, remote sensing and modelling analysis , 2007 .

[68]  E. Fischer,et al.  Contribution of land‐atmosphere coupling to recent European summer heat waves , 2007 .

[69]  N. Breda,et al.  Temperate forest trees and stands under severe drought: a review of ecophysiological responses, adaptation processes and long-term consequences , 2006 .

[70]  E. Kowalczyk,et al.  The CSIRO Atmosphere Biosphere Land Exchange (CABLE) model for use in climate models and as an offline model , 2006 .

[71]  Gabriel Abramowitz,et al.  Towards a benchmark for land surface models , 2005 .

[72]  K. Price,et al.  Regional vegetation die-off in response to global-change-type drought. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[73]  P. Ciais,et al.  Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003 , 2005, Nature.

[74]  Wayne A. Geyer,et al.  North American Temperate Deciduous Forest Responses to Changing Precipitation Regimes , 2004 .

[75]  F. Woodward,et al.  Vegetation dynamics – simulating responses to climatic change , 2004, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[76]  D. Lüthi,et al.  The role of increasing temperature variability in European summer heatwaves , 2004, Nature.

[77]  H. A. Mooney,et al.  Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global scale , 1996, Oecologia.

[78]  S. Green,et al.  Root water uptake by kiwifruit vines following partial wetting of the root zone , 1995, Plant and Soil.

[79]  Balázs M. Fekete,et al.  Sensitivity of Annual Evaporation to Soil and Root Properties in Two Models of Contrasting Complexity , 2003 .

[80]  D. Baldocchi,et al.  Seasonal trends in photosynthetic parameters and stomatal conductance of blue oak (Quercus douglasii) under prolonged summer drought and high temperature. , 2003, Tree physiology.

[81]  Bettina M. J. Engelbrecht,et al.  Comparative drought-resistance of seedlings of 28 species of co-occurring tropical woody plants , 2003, Oecologia.

[82]  J. Pereira,et al.  Understanding plant responses to drought - from genes to the whole plant. , 2003, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[83]  M. Huston,et al.  Walker Branch Throughfall Displacement Experiment , 2003 .

[84]  Eric A. Davidson,et al.  The effects of partial throughfall exclusion on canopy processes, aboveground production, and biogeochemistry of an Amazon forest , 2002 .

[85]  Wade T. Crow,et al.  Impact of Soil Moisture Aggregation on Surface Energy Flux Prediction During SGP'97 , 2002 .

[86]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Modeling Root Water Uptake in Hydrological and Climate Models. , 2001 .

[87]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Evaluating different soil and plant hydraulic constraints on tree function using a model and sap flow data from ponderosa pine , 2001 .

[88]  Gabriel G. Katul,et al.  The dynamic role of root-water uptake in coupling potential to actual transpiration , 2000 .

[89]  S. Running,et al.  MODIS Leaf Area Index (LAI) And Fraction Of Photosynthetically Active Radiation Absorbed By Vegetation (FPAR) Product , 1999 .

[90]  D. Diner,et al.  Estimation of vegetation canopy leaf area index and fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation from atmosphere‐corrected MISR data , 1998 .

[91]  Maurizio Mencuccini,et al.  Control of stomatal conductance by leaf water potential in Hymenoclea salsola (T. & G.), a desert subshrub , 1998 .

[92]  R. Leuning,et al.  A two-leaf model for canopy conductance, photosynthesis and partitioning of available energy I:: Model description and comparison with a multi-layered model , 1998 .

[93]  Axel Kleidon,et al.  A method of determining rooting depth from a terrestrial biosphere model and its impacts on the global water and carbon cycle , 1998 .

[94]  François Tardieu,et al.  Variability among species of stomatal control under fluctuating soil water status and evaporative demand: modelling isohydric and anisohydric behaviours , 1998 .

[95]  Bingru Huang,et al.  Drought-resistance mechanisms of seven warm-season turfgrasses under surface soil drying. I. Shoot response , 1997 .

[96]  R. Waring,et al.  A generalised model of forest productivity using simplified concepts of radiation-use efficiency, carbon balance and partitioning , 1997 .

[97]  J. Flexas,et al.  Variation in leaf longevity of Pistacia lentiscus and its relationship to sex and drought stress inferred from leaf δ13C , 1997 .

[98]  P. Milly.  Sensitivity of greenhouse summer dryness to changes in plant rooting characteristics , 1997 .

[99]  S. Wofsy,et al.  Modelling the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum in a Quercus-Acer stand at Harvard Forest : the regulation of stomatal conductance by light, nitrogen and soil/plant hydraulic properties , 1996 .

[100]  Y. Xue,et al.  Analysis of transpiration results from the RICE and PILPS Workshop , 1996 .

[101]  D. White.  Physiological responses to drought of Eucalyptus globulus and Eucalyptus nitens in plantations , 1996 .

[102]  R. Leuning.  A critical appraisal of a combined stomatal‐photosynthesis model for C3 plants , 1995 .

[103]  Michael R. Raupach,et al.  Simplified expressions for vegetation roughness length and zero-plane displacement as functions of canopy height and area index , 1994 .

[104]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models , 1994 .

[105]  Hervé Cochard,et al.  Drought‐induced leaf shedding in walnut: evidence for vulnerability segmentation , 1993 .

[106]  S. Pallardy,et al.  Response of gas exchange to water stress in seedlings of woody angiosperms. , 1991, Tree physiology.

[107]  P. S. Eagleson,et al.  Land Surface Hydrology Parameterization for Atmospheric General Circulation models Including Subgrid Scale Spatial Variability , 1989 .

[108]  P. Reich,et al.  Influence of pre-dawn water potential and soil-to-leaf hydraulic conductance on maximum daily leaf diffusive conductance in two oak species , 1989 .

[109]  W. Cramer,et al.  Simulation of regional soil moisture deficits on a European scale , 1988 .

[110]  E. Steen,et al.  Root mass in plantations of Eucalyptus globulus in portugal in relation to soil characteristics , 1987 .

[111]  Photosynthesis, water relations, and drought adaptation in six woody species of oak-hickory forests in central Missouri. , 1985 .

[112]  E. Schulze,et al.  Comparison of water potentials measured by in situ psychrometry and pressure chamber in morphologically different species. , 1984, Plant physiology.

[113]  G. Hornberger,et al.  Empirical equations for some soil hydraulic properties , 1978 .

[114]  I. R. Cowan,et al.  Stomatal function in relation to leaf metabolism and environment. , 1977, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology.

[115]  Gaylon S. Campbell,et al.  A SIMPLE METHOD FOR DETERMINING UNSATURATED CONDUCTIVITY FROM MOISTURE RETENTION DATA , 1974 .

[116]  W. R. Gardner.  DYNAMIC ASPECTS OF WATER AVAILABILITY TO PLANTS , 1960 .