Animacy and grammatical variation—Findings from English genitive variation

[1]  Jan Svartvik,et al.  A __ comprehensive grammar of the English language , 1988 .

[2]  Comrie Bernard.  Language Universals and Linguistic Typology , 1982 .

[3]  Hansjakob Seiler,et al.  Possession : as an operational dimension of language , 1983 .

[4]  Paul Deane,et al.  English Possessives, Topicality, and the Silverstein Hierarchy , 1987 .

[5]  Jeanette K. Gundel,et al.  On the function of marked and unmarked terms , 1988 .

[6]  Michael Hammond,et al.  Studies in Syntactic Typology , 1988 .

[7]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[8]  Paul Douglas Deane,et al.  Grammar in mind and brain : explorations in cognitive syntax , 1992 .

[9]  K. Bock,et al.  From conceptual roles to structural relations: bridging the syntactic cleft. , 1992 .

[10]  M. H. Kelly,et al.  Word and World Order: Semantic, Phonological, and Metrical Determinants of Serial Position , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  B. Victorri,et al.  Continuity in linguistic semantics , 1994 .

[12]  G. Leech,et al.  The use of computer corpora in the textual demonstrability of gradience in linguistic categories. , 1994 .

[13]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Language production : Grammatical encoding , 1994 .

[14]  John A. Hawkins,et al.  A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency , 1995 .

[15]  R. Raab-Fischer.  Löst der Genitiv die of-Phrase ab ? Eine korpusgestützte Studie zum Sprachwandel im heutigen English , 1995 .

[16]  Martha J Farah,et al.  The Living/Nonliving Dissociation is Not an Artifact: Giving an A Priori Implausible Hypothesis a Strong Test. , 1996, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[17]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge , 1996, Nature.

[18]  Maria Polinsky,et al.  Possessives in English , 1996 .

[19]  A. Ortmann.  The Role of [±animate] in Inflection , 1998 .

[20]  Marianne Hundt,et al.  New Zealand English Grammar – Fact or Fiction?: A corpus-based study in morphosyntactic variation , 1998 .

[21]  Ewa Dabrowska,et al.  How metaphor affects grammatical coding: the Saxon genitive in computer manuals , 1998, English Language and Linguistics.

[22]  R. Fabri,et al.  Models of Inflection , 1998 .

[23]  Simon Kirby,et al.  Function, Selection, and Innateness: The Emergence of Language Universals , 1999 .

[24]  Mutsumi Yamamoto,et al.  Animacy and reference , 1999 .

[25]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering , 2015 .

[26]  Rosanna Sornicola,et al.  Stability, variation, and change of word-order patterns over time , 2000 .

[27]  Anette Rosenbach,et al.  Genitive constructions in Early Modern English: new evidence from a corpus analysis , 2000 .

[28]  Ulrike Demske,et al.  Merkmale und Relationen : diachrone Studien zur Nominalphrase des Deutschen , 2001 .

[29]  Anette Rosenbach,et al.  Genitive variation in English : conceptual factors in synchronic and diachronic studies , 2002 .

[30]  Judith Aissen,et al.  Optimality and Functionality: Objections and Refutations , 2002 .

[31]  G. Pullum,et al.  The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language , 2002 .

[32]  Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm.  Adnominal possession in the European languages: form and function , 2002 .

[33]  Frederick J. Newmeyer,et al.  Optimality And Functionality: A Critique of Functionally-Based Optimality-Theoretic Syntax , 2002 .

[34]  Christopher D. Manning,et al.  Soft Constraints Mirror Hard Constraints: Voice and Person in English and Lummi , 2002 .

[35]  Karin Harbusch,et al.  A corpus study into word order variation in German subordinate clauses: Animacy affects linearization independently of function assignment , 2003 .

[36]  Frederick J. Newmeyer,et al.  Grammar is Grammar and Usage is Usage , 2003 .

[37]  Heike Tappe,et al.  Mediating between concepts and grammar , 2003 .

[38]  Kathy Y. van Nice,et al.  Task sensitivity of animacy effects: evidence from German picture descriptions , 2003 .

[39]  Christopher Habel,et al.  Multidisciplinary approaches to language production , 2004 .

[40]  Vivienne Fong,et al.  Variation, ambiguity, and noun classes in English , 2004 .

[41]  Mengistu Amberber,et al.  Competition and Variation in Natural Languages , 2005 .

[42]  Anette Rosenbach,et al.  Animacy Versus Weight as Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English , 2005 .

[43]  Jan Strunk,et al.  The role of animacy in the nominal possessive constructions of Modern Low Saxon , 2005 .

[44]  G. Jäger,et al.  The winner takes it all — almost: cumulativity in grammatical variation , 2006 .

[45]  A. Caramazza,et al.  The organisation of conceptual knowledge in the brain: The future's past and some future directions , 2006, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[46]  Marianne Hundt,et al.  Corpus Linguistics and the Web , 2006 .

[47]  Mante S. Nieuwland,et al.  When Peanuts Fall in Love: N400 Evidence for the Power of Discourse , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[48]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Predicting the dative alternation , 2007 .

[49]  I. Krämer,et al.  Cognitive foundations of interpretation , 2007 .

[50]  Anette Rosenbach,et al.  Emerging variation: determiner genitives and noun modifiers in English , 2007, English Language and Linguistics.

[51]  Anette Rosenbach,et al.  Exploring constructions on the web: a case study , 2007 .