Faludi's 'Sociology in Planning Education': A Critical Comment
暂无分享,去创建一个
Professor Faludi's paper, `Sociology in Planning Education' (Urban Studies, 1976), is a welcome contribution to an important, if neglected, issue, which we hope will open a debate that is long overdue in planning education . It is to be expected that an initial contribution will pose more questions that it answers and this, we believe, is certainly the case with Faludi's paper . We offer this comment with a view to clarifying the essential features of the debate . Faludi's argument is rather difficult to summarise ; however, its central points appear to be
[1] R. Pahl. Whose City?: And Further Essays on Urban Society , 1976 .
[2] H. Rittel,et al. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .
[3] J. Walls,et al. Education for Planning: City, State, and Regional. Harvey S. Perloff , 1958 .
[4] A. Benjamin Handler,et al. What is Planning Theory , 1957 .
[5] Jennifer Thornley,et al. A Reader in Planning Theory , 1974 .
[6] M. Brodbeck,et al. Models, Meaning and Theories* , 1960 .