Eye Movement Control during Reading: Effects of Word Frequency and Orthographic Familiarity Word Frequency Effects

Word frequency and orthographic familiarity were independently manipulated as readers' eye movements were recorded. Word frequency influenced fixation durations and the probability of word skipping when orthographic familiarity was controlled. These results indicate that lexical processing of words can influence saccade programming (as shown by fixation durations and which words are fixated). Orthographic familiarity, but not word frequency, influenced the duration of prior fixations. These results provide evidence for orthographic, but not lexical, parafoveal-on-foveal effects. Overall, the findings have a crucial implication for models of eye movement control in reading: There must be sufficient time for lexical factors to influence saccade programming before saccade metrics and timing are finalized. The conclusions are critical for the fundamental architecture of models of eye movement control in reading -- namely, how to reconcile long saccade programming times and complex linguistic influences on saccades during reading.

[1]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models , 2003, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[2]  A Pollatsek,et al.  The effects of "neighborhood size" in reading and lexical decision. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  J. Hyönä,et al.  The length of a complex word modifies the role of morphological structure: Evidence from eye movements when reading short and long Finnish compounds , 2003 .

[4]  D. Broadbent,et al.  Visual perception of words differing in letter digram frequency , 1968 .

[5]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Fixation durations before word skipping in reading , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  M. Gernsbacher Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[7]  Philip T Quinlan,et al.  Orthographic processing in visual word identification , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Mislocated fixations during reading and the inverted optimal viewing position effect , 2005, Vision Research.

[9]  J Grainger,et al.  Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. , 1996, Psychological review.

[10]  Barbara J. Juhasz,et al.  The effect of plausibility on eye movements in reading. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  J. O'Regan Eye movements and reading. , 1990, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[12]  M. S. Mayzner,et al.  Tables of single-letter and digram frequency counts for various word-length and letter-position combinations. , 1965 .

[13]  Albrecht W. Inhoff,et al.  Attention allocation to the right and left of a fixated word: Use of orthographic information from multiple words during reading , 2004 .

[14]  Keith Rayner,et al.  On the Processing of Meaning from Parafoveal Vision During Eye Fixations in Reading , 2003 .

[15]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  Albrecht W. Inhoff,et al.  Orthographic regularity gradually modulates saccade amplitudes in reading , 2004 .

[17]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Eye movements and word skipping during reading revisited. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  R. Walker,et al.  A model of saccade generation based on parallel processing and competitive inhibition , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[19]  M A Just,et al.  A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. , 1980, Psychological review.

[20]  Simon P Liversedge,et al.  Linguistic and nonlinguistic influences on the eyes' landing positions during reading , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[21]  C. Clifton,et al.  Overt reanalysis strategies and eye movements during the reading of mild garden path sentences , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[22]  A. Kennedy,et al.  Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading , 2005, Vision Research.

[23]  G. Legge,et al.  Mr. Chips 2002: new insights from an ideal-observer model of reading , 2002, Vision Research.

[24]  Alan Kennedy,et al.  Parafoveal Processing in Word Recognition , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[25]  Joël Pynte,et al.  Reading as a Perceptual Process , 2000 .

[26]  Robin L. Hill,et al.  Eye movements : a window on mind and brain , 2007 .

[27]  J. O'Regan Optimal Viewing Position in Words and the Strategy-Tactics Theory of Eye Movements in Reading , 1992 .

[28]  Robert W. Kentridge,et al.  Eye movements when reading disappearing text: is there a gap effect in reading? , 2004, Vision Research.

[29]  J. H. Bertera,et al.  Latency of sequential eye movements: implications for reading. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  Marcel Adam Just,et al.  A Model of the Time Course and Content of Reading , 1982, Cogn. Sci..

[31]  G. Legge,et al.  Mr. Chips: An ideal-observer model of reading , 1997 .

[32]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Reading Disappearing Text , 2003, Psychological science.

[33]  G. Underwood Cognitive processes in eye guidance , 2005 .

[34]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Modeling the effects of lexical ambiguity on eye movements during reading , 2007 .

[35]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye Movement Control during Reading: Evidence for Direct Control , 1981, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[36]  A W Inhoff,et al.  Is the processing of words during eye fixations in reading strictly serial? , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[37]  J. Henderson,et al.  Eye movement control during reading: fixation measures reflect foveal but not parafoveal processing difficulty. , 1993, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[38]  Ton Dijkstra,et al.  Computational psycholinguistics : AI and connectionist models of human language processing , 1996 .

[39]  John M. Findlay,et al.  Serial programming for saccades: Does it all add up? , 2003 .

[40]  S. D. Lima,et al.  Lexical access during eye fixations in reading: effects of word-initial letter sequence. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[41]  K. Rayner,et al.  Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[42]  K. Rayner The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[43]  P Suppes,et al.  Eye-movement models for arithmetic and reading performance. , 1990, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[44]  Françoise Vitu,et al.  Word skipping: Implications for theories of eye movement control in reading , 1998 .

[45]  J. Henderson,et al.  Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: implications for attention and eye movement control. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[46]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. , 1998, Psychological review.

[47]  W. Becker,et al.  An analysis of the saccadic system by means of double step stimuli , 1979, Vision Research.

[48]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Tests of the E-Z Reader model: Exploring the interface between cognition and eye-movement control , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.

[49]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Tracking the mind during reading via eye movements: comments on Kliegl, Nuthmann, and Engbert (2006). , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[50]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  Commentary on Section 2. Attention, information processing and eye movement control. , 2000 .

[51]  Sarah J. White Foveal load and parafoveal processing: The case of word skipping , 2007 .

[52]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Eye movements in reading: Old questions and new directions , 2004 .

[53]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Do readers obtain preview benefit from word N + 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[54]  Gary Feng,et al.  Eye movements as time-series random variables: A stochastic model of eye movement control in reading , 2006, Cognitive Systems Research.

[55]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .

[56]  K. Rayner Eye Movements and Cognitive Processes in Reading, Visual Search, and Scene Perception , 1995 .

[57]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Mislocated fixations can account for parafoveal-on-foveal effects in eye movements during reading , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[58]  Robert W. Kentridge,et al.  Eye movement research : mechanisms, processes and applications , 1995 .

[59]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Eye Movement Control during Reading: Foveal Load and Parafoveal Processing , 1999, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[60]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  A dynamical model of saccade generation in reading based on spatially distributed lexical processing , 2002, Vision Research.

[61]  D. O. Robinson,et al.  The role of bigram frequency in the perception of words and nonwords , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[62]  Gale L Martin,et al.  Encoder: a connectionist model of how learning to visually encode fixated text images improves reading fluency. , 2004, Psychological review.

[63]  Jukka Hyönä,et al.  Do irregular letter combinations attract readers' attention? Evidence from fixation locations in words. , 1995 .

[64]  C. Clifton,et al.  Determinants of parafoveal preview benefit in high and low working memory capacity readers: implications for eye movement control. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[65]  A. Pollatsek,et al.  The effects of neighborhood frequency in reading and lexical decision. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[66]  A. Kennedy,et al.  An influence over eye movements in reading exerted from beyond the level of the word: Evidence from reading English and French , 2006, Vision Research.

[67]  M. Pickering,et al.  Eye guidance in reading and scene perception , 1998 .

[68]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. , 2005, Psychological review.

[69]  Sarah J. White,et al.  Eye movements and the modulation of parafoveal processing by foveal processing difficulty: A reexamination , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[70]  J. H. Bertera,et al.  The availability of useful information to the right of fixation in reading , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[71]  Hedderik van Rijn,et al.  Eye guidance and the saliency of word beginnings in reading text , 2000 .

[72]  R H S Carpenter,et al.  An anatomically constrained, stochastic model of eye movement control in reading. , 2005, Psychological review.

[73]  Dario D. Salvucci An integrated model of eye movements and visual encoding , 2001, Cognitive Systems Research.

[74]  Stephen J Lupker,et al.  Is there a neighborhood frequency effect in English? Evidence from reading and lexical decision. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[75]  G. Biederman,et al.  Supplementary report: The recognition of tachistoscopically presented five-letter words as a function of digram frequency. , 1966 .

[76]  Gary E. Raney,et al.  Word frequency effects and eye movements during two readings of a text. , 1995, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[77]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition , 1984 .

[78]  R. Reilly,et al.  Eye movement control during reading: A simulation of some word-targeting strategies , 1998, Vision Research.

[79]  Eileen Kowler Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes. , 1990, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[80]  C. Schiepers,et al.  Response latency and accuracy in visual word recogniton , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[81]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye movement control in reading: word predictability has little influence on initial landing positions in words , 2001, Vision Research.

[82]  G. McConkie,et al.  Eye movements during reading: a theory of saccade initiation times , 2001, Vision Research.

[83]  Jukka Hyönä,et al.  Is emotional content obtained from parafoveal words during reading? An eye movement analysis. , 2005, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[84]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Eye movement control in reading: accounting for initial fixation locations and refixations within the E-Z Reader model , 1999, Vision Research.

[85]  Ralph Radach,et al.  Time course of linguistic information extraction from consecutive words during eye fixations in reading. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[86]  K. Rayner,et al.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[87]  Eyal M. Reingold Eye-movement control in reading: Models and predictions , 2003 .

[88]  Alan Kennedy,et al.  Chapter 10 – The Reader's Spatial Code , 2003 .

[89]  G. McConkie,et al.  Regressive Saccades and Word Perception in Adult Reading , 2000 .

[90]  Simon P. Liversedge,et al.  Orthographic familiarity influences initial eye fixation positions in reading , 2004 .

[91]  P. W. Kerr,et al.  Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fixations on words , 1987, Vision Research.

[92]  M. G. Calvo,et al.  Eye Movements and Processing Stages in Reading: Relative Contribution of Visual, Lexical, and Contextual Factors , 2002, The Spanish Journal of Psychology.

[93]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Investigating the effects of a set of intercorrelated variables on eye fixation durations in reading. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[94]  Ronan G. Reilly,et al.  Some empirical tests of an interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading , 2006, Cognitive Systems Research.

[95]  A Pollatsek,et al.  Semantic codes are not used in integrating information across eye fixations in reading: Evidence from fluent Spanish-English bilinguals , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[96]  Terry C. Lansdown,et al.  The mind's eye: cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research , 2005 .

[97]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Eye movements and identifying words in parafoveal vision , 1981 .

[98]  Tatjana A. Nazir,et al.  Traces of Print Along the Visual Pathway , 2000 .

[99]  Ronan G. Reilly,et al.  Chapter 21 – Foundations of an Interactive Activation Model of Eye Movement Control in Reading , 2003 .

[100]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  E–Z Reader: A cognitive-control, serial-attention model of eye-movement behavior during reading , 2006, Cognitive Systems Research.

[101]  Geoffrey Underwood,et al.  Attentional Demands on the Processing of Neighbouring Words , 2000 .

[102]  Simon P. Liversedge,et al.  Psycholinguistic processes affect fixation durations and orthographic information affects fixation locations: Can e-z reader cope? , 2003 .

[103]  Shun-Nan Yang,et al.  An oculomotor-based model of eye movements in reading: The competition/interaction model , 2006, Cognitive Systems Research.

[104]  Jukka Hyönä,et al.  Do frequency characteristics of nonfixated words influence the processing of fixated words during reading? , 2004 .

[105]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Tracking the mind during reading: the influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[106]  Alan Kennedy,et al.  The Influence of Parafoveal Words on Foveal Inspection Time: Evidence for a Processing Trade-Off , 1998 .

[107]  George W. McConkie,et al.  How Cognition Affects Eye Movements During Reading , 2003 .

[108]  Simon P. Liversedge,et al.  Foveal processing difficulty does not modulate non-foveal orthographic influences on fixation positions , 2006, Vision Research.

[109]  A. Kennedy,et al.  Parafoveal-on-foveal interactions in word recognition , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[110]  G. d'Ydewalle,et al.  The in ̄uence of semantic context on initial eye landing sites in words , 2000 .

[111]  R. E. Morrison,et al.  Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: evidence for parallel programming of saccades. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[112]  Gary E. Raney,et al.  Eye movement control in reading: a comparison of two types of models. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[113]  A. Kennedy,et al.  The influence of parafoveal typographical errors on eye movements in reading , 2004 .

[114]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Basic processes in reading : visual word recognition , 1993 .

[115]  V. M. Holmes,et al.  DECOMPOSING FRENCH WORDS , 1987 .

[116]  Joël Pynte,et al.  Within-word inspection strategies in continuous reading: time course of perceptual, lexical, and contextual processes , 1991 .

[117]  L. Henderson Orthography and Word Recognition in Reading , 1982 .

[118]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  Current advances in SWIFT , 2006, Cognitive Systems Research.

[119]  Seth N. Greenberg,et al.  Allocation of Visuo-Spatial Attention and Saccade Programming During Reading , 2000 .

[120]  K. Rayner,et al.  Examining the Word Identification Stages Hypothesized by the E-Z Reader Model , 2006, Psychological science.

[121]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Spelling-sound effects in reading: Time-course and decision criteria , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[122]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: implications for the E-Z Reader model. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[123]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Unspaced text interferes with both word identification and eye movement control , 1998, Vision Research.

[124]  K. Rayner Eye movements and visual cognition : scene perception and reading , 1992 .

[125]  K. Rayner,et al.  Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.