Reconceptualising moderation in asynchronous online discussions using grounded theory

This article reports a grounded theory study of the moderation of asynchronous online discussions, to explore the processes by which tutors in higher education decide when and how to moderate. It aims to construct a theory of e‐moderation based on some key factors which appear to influence e‐moderation. It discusses previous research on the definition and practice of e‐moderation, and then describes the study, which involved four e‐moderators working in two different university contexts. Key themes on e‐moderation, which emerged using a grounded theory approach, are discussed. It proposes a framework for e‐moderation and suggests that as a facilitative activity, it should be sufficiently contained within a ring‐fenced learning arena. Factors outside and inside the ring‐fence that appear to influence e‐moderation and their implications for future theory development and validation are discussed.

[1]  Ronnie Davey,et al.  Our first time: two higher education tutors reflect on becoming a ‘virtual teacher’ , 2005 .

[2]  Pam. Moule,et al.  Challenging the five-stage model for e-learning: A new approach , 2007 .

[3]  J. Creswell.  Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. , 1998 .

[4]  Philip Barker,et al.  On Being an Online Tutor , 2002 .

[5]  E-Reflections: A Comparative Exploration of the Role of e-learning in TrainingHigher Education Lecturers , 2005 .

[6]  Janet Macdonald,et al.  Blended Learning And Online Tutoring: A Good Practice Guide , 2006 .

[7]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .

[8]  Daniel V. Eastmond.  E-Moderating: The Key to Teaching and Learning Online , 2003 .

[9]  Bill Anderson,et al.  Writing power into online discussion , 2006 .

[10]  D. Gash.  E-moderating: the key to teaching and learning online , 2012 .

[11]  Mandy Schiefner.  Will E-learning Die? , 2008 .

[12]  Tisha Bender,et al.  Discussion-Based Online Teaching to Enhance Student Learning: Theory, Practice and Assessment , 2003 .

[13]  Brent Muirhead,et al.  E-tivities: The key to active online learning , 2002, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[14]  Zane L. Berge,et al.  Facilitating Computer Conferencing: Recommendations from the Field. , 1995 .

[15]  W. Polonsky,et al.  The Tipping Point , 2007, The Diabetes educator.

[16]  Pat Jefferies,et al.  Using Asynchronous Computer Conferencing to Support Learning and Teaching in a Campus-Based HE Context: Beyond E-Moderating , 2006 .

[17]  Terry Anderson,et al.  E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Community of Inquiry Framework for Research and Practice , 2016 .

[18]  Susan Ko,et al.  Teaching Online: A Practical Guide , 2000 .

[19]  Leslie Jarmon,et al.  Virtual world teaching, experiential learning, and assessment: An interdisciplinary communication course in Second Life , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[20]  Peggy A. Ertmer,et al.  Problem-solving in a case-based course: Strategies for facilitating coached expertise , 2001 .

[21]  Paul Joyce,et al.  Examining the five-stage e-moderating model: designed and emergent practice in the learning technology profession , 2003 .

[22]  Rhona Sharpe,et al.  The Role of the Tutor in Blended E-Learning: Experiences from Interprofessional Education , 2008 .

[23]  Zane L. Berge,et al.  The Role of the Online Instructor/Facilitator , 2003 .

[24]  D. Jonassen,et al.  A Manifesto for a Constructivist Approach to Uses of Technology in Higher Education , 1993 .

[25]  Christina Goulding.  Grounded theory: the missing methodology on the interpretivist agenda , 1998 .

[26]  Shirley Bennett,et al.  Are We Expecting Online Tutors to Run Before They Can Walk? , 2002 .