The effectiveness of physical models in teaching anatomy: a meta-analysis of comparative studies

There are various educational methods used in anatomy teaching. While three dimensional (3D) visualization technologies are gaining ground due to their ever-increasing realism, reports investigating physical models as a low-cost 3D traditional method are still the subject of considerable interest. The aim of this meta-analysis is to quantitatively assess the effectiveness of such models based on comparative studies. Eight studies (7 randomized trials; 1 quasi-experimental) including 16 comparison arms and 820 learners met the inclusion criteria. Primary outcomes were defined as factual, spatial and overall percentage scores. The meta-analytical results are: educational methods using physical models yielded significantly better results when compared to all other educational methods for the overall knowledge outcome (p < 0.001) and for spatial knowledge acquisition (p < 0.001). Significantly better results were also found with regard to the long-retention knowledge outcome (p < 0.01). No significance was found for the factual knowledge acquisition outcome. The evidence in the present systematic review was found to have high internal validity and at least an acceptable strength. In conclusion, physical anatomical models offer a promising tool for teaching gross anatomy in 3D representation due to their easy accessibility and educational effectiveness. Such models could be a practical tool to bring up the learners’ level of gross anatomy knowledge at low cost.

[1]  J E F Fitzgerald,et al.  Are we teaching sufficient anatomy at medical school? The opinions of newly qualified doctors , 2008, Clinical anatomy.

[2]  T. Boutefnouchet,et al.  A three‐year prospective longitudinal cohort study of medical students' attitudes toward anatomy teaching and their career aspirations , 2010, Anatomical sciences education.

[3]  W. Cottam,et al.  Adequacy of medical school gross anatomy education as perceived by certain postgraduate residency programs and anatomy course directors , 1999, Clinical anatomy.

[4]  Lap Ki Chan,et al.  An analysis of the educational value of low‐fidelity anatomy models as external representations , 2011, Anatomical sciences education.

[5]  Julian A. Smith.  Can anatomy teaching make a come back? , 2005, ANZ journal of surgery.

[6]  Claudio Violato,et al.  A meta‐analysis of the educational effectiveness of three‐dimensional visualization technologies in teaching anatomy , 2015, Anatomical sciences education.

[7]  A. Khurana,et al.  The anatomy of anatomy: A review for its modernization , 2010, Anatomical sciences education.

[8]  S. Becker,et al.  Malpractice in Head and Neck Surgery , 2012, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[9]  M. Stringer,et al.  Iatrogenic nerve injury in a national no‐fault compensation scheme: an observational cohort study , 2012, International journal of clinical practice.

[10]  Katerina V. Thompson,et al.  Are all hands-on activities equally effective? Effect of using plastic models, organ dissections, and virtual dissections on student learning and perceptions. , 2014, Advances in physiology education.

[11]  Emil H Schemitsch,et al.  Virtual fracture carving improves understanding of a complex fracture: a randomized controlled study. , 2012, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  Peter R Bergethon,et al.  A novel three‐dimensional tool for teaching human neuroanatomy , 2010, Anatomical sciences education.

[13]  A. Ziv,et al.  Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review , 2005, Medical teacher.

[14]  D. Cottrell,et al.  Evaluation of a hemostasis model for teaching ovariohysterectomy in veterinary surgery. , 2000, Veterinary surgery.

[15]  S. Das,et al.  Comparison of three aids for teaching lumbar surgical anatomy , 2013, British journal of neurosurgery.

[16]  Sarah B. Williams,et al.  “Let's Get Physical”: Advantages of a physical model over 3D computer models and textbooks in learning imaging anatomy , 2013, Anatomical sciences education.

[17]  J. Fasel,et al.  Anatomy teaching for medical undergraduates: General practice as a guideline? The brain , 1999, Clinical anatomy.

[18]  B. Wainman,et al.  The relative effectiveness of computer‐based and traditional resources for education in anatomy , 2013, Anatomical sciences education.

[19]  G. Norman,et al.  How medical students learn spatial anatomy , 2001, The Lancet.

[20]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[21]  Kevin W Eva,et al.  Is There Any Real Virtue of Virtual Reality?: The Minor Role of Multiple Orientations in Learning Anatomy from Computers , 2002, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[22]  D. Dolmans,et al.  A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME Guide No. 8 , 2006, Medical teacher.

[23]  S. Tibrewal.  The anatomy knowledge of surgical trainees: the trainer's view , 2006 .

[24]  Donald L. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Evaluating Training Programs : The Four Levels , 2009 .

[25]  G. Norman,et al.  Virtual reality and brain anatomy: a randomised trial of e‐learning instructional designs , 2007, Medical education.

[26]  Thenkurussi Kesavadas,et al.  Can image-based virtual reality help teach anatomy? , 2010, Journal of endourology.

[27]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[28]  M. Stuart,et al.  Survey of clinicians' attitudes to the anatomical teaching and knowledge of medical students , 2005, Clinical anatomy.

[29]  J. R. Waters,et al.  Cat dissection vs. sculpting human structures in clay: an analysis of two approaches to undergraduate human anatomy laboratory education. , 2005, Advances in physiology education.

[30]  O. Plaisant,et al.  The future of clinical anatomy , 2011 .

[31]  Amit Garg,et al.  Modern moulage: evaluating the use of 3-dimensional prosthetic mimics in a dermatology teaching program for second-year medical students. , 2010, Archives of dermatology.

[32]  Ji-Young Kim,et al.  Learning of cross‐sectional anatomy using clay models , 2009, Anatomical sciences education.

[33]  Janet Grant,et al.  Best Evidence Medical Education , 2000, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[34]  J. Somville,et al.  Analysis of Surgical Errors in Malpractice Claims in Belgium , 2010, Acta chirurgica Belgica.

[35]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[36]  G R Norman,et al.  Do virtual computer models hinder anatomy learning? , 1999, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.