Longitudinal Study of Crime Hot Spots

Objectives: Design and estimate the impacts of a prevention program for part 1 violent crimes in micro-place crime hot spots. Methods: A longitudinal study of crime hot spots using 21 years of crime offense report data on part 1 violent crimes from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Based on kernel density smoothing for a definition of micro-place crime hot spots, we replicate past work on the existence of “chronic” hot spots, but then with such hot spots accounted for introduce “temporary” hot spots. Results: Chronic hot spots are good targets for prevention. They are easily identified and they tend to persist. Temporary hot spots, however, predominantly last only one month. Thus the common practice of identifying hot spots using a short time window of crime data and assuming that the resulting hot spots will persist is ineffective for temporary hot spots. Instead it is necessary to forecast the emergence of temporary hot spots to prevent their crimes. Over time chronic hot spots, while still important, have accounted for less crime while temporary hot spots have grown, accounting for a larger share. Chronic hot spots are relatively easy targets for police whereas temporary hot spots require forecasting methods not commonly in use by police. Conclusions: The paper estimates approximately a 10 to 20 percent reduction in part 1 violent crimes in Pittsburgh if the hot spot enforcement program proposed in this paper were implemented.

[1]  Terance D. Miethe.  CITIZEN-BASED CRIME CONTROL ACTIVITY AND VICTIMIZATION RISKS: AN EXAMINATION OF DISPLACEMENT AND FREE-RIDER EFFECTS* , 1991 .

[2]  Daniel B. Neill,et al.  Expectation-based scan statistics for monitoring spatial time series data , 2009 .

[3]  William Spelman,et al.  CRIMINAL CAREERS OF PUBLIC PLACES , 1995 .

[4]  Patricia L. Brantingham,et al.  Mobility, Notoriety, and Crime: A Study in the Crime Patterns of Urban Nodal Points , 1981 .

[5]  Elizabeth R. Groff,et al.  The Criminology of Place: Street Segments and Our Understanding of the Crime Problem , 2012 .

[6]  Michael R. Gottfredson,et al.  A general theory of crime. , 1992 .

[7]  Wilpen L. Gorr,et al.  Short-term forecasting of crime , 2003 .

[8]  J. Carter,et al.  The Philadelphia Foot Patrol Experiment: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Police Patrol Effectiveness in Violent Crime Hotspots , 2012 .

[9]  Shane D. Johnson,et al.  Measuring the Geographical Displacement and Diffusion of Benefit Effects of Crime Prevention Activity , 2003 .

[10]  Anthony A. Braga,et al.  Hot spots policing and crime prevention: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials , 2005 .

[11]  R. Dawes.  Judgment under uncertainty: The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making , 1979 .

[12]  M J Scherdin,et al.  The halo effect: psychological deterrence of electronic security systems , 1986 .

[13]  Bruce G. Taylor,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of different policing strategies at hot spots of violent crime , 2011 .

[14]  C. F. Schmid,et al.  URBAN CRIME AREAS: PART I* , 1960 .

[15]  Patrick R. Gartin,et al.  Hot Spots of Predatory Crime: Routine Activities and the Criminology of Place , 1989 .

[16]  Wilpen L. Gorr,et al.  Forecast accuracy measures for exception reporting using receiver operating characteristic curves , 2009 .

[17]  Wilpen L. Gorr,et al.  Empirical calibration of time series monitoring methods using receiver operating characteristic curves , 2009 .

[18]  Daniel S. Nagin,et al.  Analyzing developmental trajectories: A semiparametric, group-based approach , 1999 .

[19]  Anthony A. Braga,et al.  Problem-oriented policing in violent crime places: A randomized controlled experiment , 1999 .

[20]  Wilpen L. Gorr,et al.  Leading Indicators and Spatial Interactions: A Crime‐Forecasting Model for Proactive Police Deployment , 2007 .

[21]  Elizabeth R. Groff,et al.  Hot Spots of Juvenile Crime: Findings From Seattle , 2011 .

[22]  Ronald V. Clarke,et al.  Crime Analysis for Problem Solvers in 60 Small Steps , 2005 .

[23]  D. Weisburd,et al.  Policing drug hot spots: The Jersey City drug market analysis experiment , 1995 .

[24]  Lawrence W. Sherman,et al.  General deterrent effects of police patrol in crime “hot spots”: A randomized, controlled trial , 1995 .

[25]  H. D. McKay,et al.  Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas , 1943 .

[26]  Lawrence W. Sherman,et al.  Deterrent effects of police raids on crack houses: A randomized, controlled experiment , 1995 .

[27]  John E. Eck,et al.  DOES CRIME JUST MOVE AROUND THE CORNER? A CONTROLLED STUDY OF SPATIAL DISPLACEMENT AND DIFFUSION OF CRIME CONTROL BENEFITS* , 2006 .

[28]  Ronald V. Clarke,et al.  DIFFUSION OF CRIME CONTROL BENEFITS: OBSERVATIONS ON THE REVERSE OF DISPLACEMENT , 2006 .

[29]  S. Chainey,et al.  Mapping Crime: Understanding Hot Spots , 2014 .

[30]  Jonathan P. Caulkins,et al.  Local Drug Markets' Response to Focused Police Enforcement , 1993, Oper. Res..

[31]  Lawrence E. Cohen,et al.  Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach , 1979 .

[32]  S. Bushway,et al.  Trajectories of Crime at Places: A Longitudinal Study of Street Segments in the City of Seattle , 2004 .

[33]  Thomas A. Reppetto.  Crime Prevention and the Displacement Phenomenon , 1976 .

[34]  Spencer Ch.  The Utility of Hotspot Mapping for Predicting Spatial Patterns of Crime , 2008 .

[35]  George L. Kelling,et al.  Fixing Broken Windows , 1995 .