Micromechanical analysis of the binding of DNA-bending proteins HMGB1, NHP6A, and HU reveals their ability to form highly stable DNA-protein complexes.

The mechanical response generated by binding of the nonspecific DNA-bending proteins HMGB1, NHP6A, and HU to single tethered 48.5 kb lambda-DNA molecules is investigated using DNA micromanipulation. As protein concentration is increased, the force needed to extend the DNA molecule increases, due to its compaction by protein-generated bending. Most significantly, we find that for each of HMGB1, NHP6A, and HU there is a well-defined protein concentration, not far above the binding threshold, above which the proteins do not spontaneously dissociate. In this regime, the amount of protein bound to the DNA, as assayed by the degree to which the DNA is compacted, is unperturbed either by replacing the surrounding protein solution with protein-free buffer or by straightening of the molecule by applied force. Thus, the stability of the protein-DNA complexes formed is dependent on the protein concentration during the binding. HU is distinguished by a switch to a DNA-stiffening function at the protein concentration where the formation of highly stable complexes occurs. Finally, introduction of competitor DNA fragments into the surrounding solution disassembles the stable DNA complexes with HMGB1, NHP6A, and HU within seconds. Since spontaneous dissociation of protein does not occur on a time scale of hours, we conclude that this rapid protein exchange in the presence of competitor DNA must occur only via "direct" DNA-DNA contact. We therefore observe that protein transport along DNA by direct transfers occurs even for proteins such as NHP6A and HU that have only one DNA-binding domain.

[1]  N. Friedman,et al.  Modulation of DNA conformations through the formation of alternative high-order HU-DNA complexes. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  Cees Dekker,et al.  Dual architectural roles of HU: formation of flexible hinges and rigid filaments. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  P. Bolton,et al.  Effects of HU binding on the equilibrium cyclization of mismatched, curved, and normal DNA. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[4]  K. Swinger,et al.  IHF and HU: flexible architects of bent DNA. , 2004, Current opinion in structural biology.

[5]  Ying Zhang,et al.  Flexible DNA bending in HU–DNA cocrystal structures , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[6]  Jie Yan,et al.  Effects of DNA-distorting proteins on DNA elastic response. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[7]  R. Monasson,et al.  Force-extension behavior of folding polymers , 2003, The European physical journal. E, Soft matter.

[8]  I. Mukerji,et al.  HU binding to bent DNA: a fluorescence resonance energy transfer and anisotropy study. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[9]  D. Dunlap,et al.  Single-molecule studies of DNA architectural changes induced by regulatory proteins. , 2003, Methods in enzymology.

[10]  R. Dame,et al.  HU: promoting or counteracting DNA compaction? , 2002, FEBS letters.

[11]  O. Gileadi,et al.  Compaction of single DNA molecules induced by binding of integration host factor (IHF) , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  S. Knapp,et al.  Thermodynamics of HMGB1 interaction with duplex DNA. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[13]  A. Travers,et al.  Structural requirements for cooperative binding of HMG1 to DNA minicircles. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  A. Travers,et al.  HMG1 and 2, and related 'architectural' DNA-binding proteins. , 2001, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[15]  C. Woldringh,et al.  HU-GFP and DAPI co-localize on the Escherichia coli nucleoid. , 2001, Biochimie.

[16]  Akira Ishihama,et al.  Two types of localization of the DNA‐binding proteins within the Escherichia coli nucleoid , 2000, Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms.

[17]  M. Beltrame,et al.  Upwardly mobile proteins , 2000, EMBO reports.

[18]  S. Smith,et al.  Single-molecule studies of DNA mechanics. , 2000, Current opinion in structural biology.

[19]  A. Travers,et al.  Recognition of distorted DNA structures by HMG domains. , 2000, Current opinion in structural biology.

[20]  S. Ueda,et al.  Growth Phase-Dependent Variation in Protein Composition of the Escherichia coli Nucleoid , 1999, Journal of bacteriology.

[21]  D. Kamashev,et al.  The binding motif recognized by HU on both nicked and cruciform DNA , 1999, The EMBO journal.

[22]  Michael Bustin,et al.  Regulation of DNA-Dependent Activities by the Functional Motifs of the High-Mobility-Group Chromosomal Proteins , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[23]  S. Adhya,et al.  Role of HU and DNA supercoiling in transcription repression: specialized nucleoprotein repression complex at gal promoters in Escherichia coli , 1999, Molecular microbiology.

[24]  T. Strick,et al.  Behavior of supercoiled DNA. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[25]  R. C. Johnson,et al.  Determinants of DNA binding and bending by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae high mobility group protein NHP6A that are important for its biological activities. Role of the unique N terminus and putative intercalating methionine. , 1998, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[26]  E. Siggia,et al.  Driving proteins off DNA using applied tension. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[27]  A. S. Lynch,et al.  Regulation of Gene Expression in Escherichia coli , 1996, Springer US.

[28]  G. Shaw,et al.  Anatomy of a Flexer–DNA Complex inside a Higher-Order Transposition Intermediate , 1996, Cell.

[29]  A. Bensimon,et al.  The Elasticity of a Single Supercoiled DNA Molecule , 1996, Science.

[30]  Reid C. Johnson,et al.  DNA Looping by Saccharomyces cerevisiae High Mobility Group Proteins NHP6A/B , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[31]  R. C. Johnson,et al.  The nonspecific DNA-binding and -bending proteins HMG1 and HMG2 promote the assembly of complex nucleoprotein structures. , 1993, Genes & development.

[32]  T. Megraw,et al.  Functional complementarity between the HMG1-like yeast mitochondrial histone HM and the bacterial histone-like protein HU. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[33]  M. Haykinson,et al.  DNA looping and the helical repeat in vitro and in vivo: effect of HU protein and enhancer location on Hin invertasome assembly. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[34]  A. Dri,et al.  Inhibition of cell division in hupA hupB mutant bacteria lacking HU protein , 1991, Journal of bacteriology.

[35]  D. Pettijohn,et al.  Introduction of proteins into living bacterial cells: distribution of labeled HU protein in Escherichia coli , 1991, Journal of bacteriology.

[36]  E. Bonnefoy,et al.  HU and IHF, two homologous histone‐like proteins of Escherichia coli, form different protein‐DNA complexes with short DNA fragments. , 1991, The EMBO journal.

[37]  K. Hughes,et al.  Subunit-specific phenotypes of Salmonella typhimurium HU mutants , 1990, Journal of bacteriology.

[38]  A. Toussaint,et al.  Multiple defects in Escherichia coli mutants lacking HU protein , 1989, Journal of bacteriology.

[39]  K. Drlica,et al.  Histonelike proteins of bacteria. , 1987, Microbiological reviews.

[40]  D. Pettijohn,et al.  Interaction of the Escherichia coli HU protein with DNA. Evidence for formation of nucleosome-like structures with altered DNA helical pitch. , 1986, Journal of molecular biology.