Swing Phase Control of Semi-Active Prosthetic Knee Using Neural Network Predictive Control With Particle Swarm Optimization

In recent years, intelligent prosthetic knees have been developed that enable amputees to walk as normally as possible when compared to healthy subjects. Although semi-active prosthetic knees utilizing magnetorheological (MR) dampers offer several advantages, they lack the ability to generate active force that is required during some states of a normal gait cycle. This prevents semi-active knees from achieving the same level of performance as active devices. In this work, a new control algorithm for a semi-active prosthetic knee during the swing phase is proposed to reduce this gap. The controller uses neural network predictive control and particle swarm optimization to calculate suitable command signals. Simulation results using a double pendulum model show that the generated knee trajectory of the proposed controller is more similar to the normal gait than previous open-loop controllers at various ambulation speeds. Moreover, the investigation shows that the algorithm can be calculated in real time by an embedded system, allowing for easy implementation on real prosthetic knees.

[1]  S. Joe Qin,et al.  A survey of industrial model predictive control technology , 2003 .

[2]  Hugh Herr,et al.  Agonist-antagonist active knee prosthesis: a preliminary study in level-ground walking. , 2009, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[3]  Daniel Vélez Día,et al.  Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement , 2013 .

[4]  Thomas F. Coleman,et al.  An Interior Trust Region Approach for Nonlinear Minimization Subject to Bounds , 1993, SIAM J. Optim..

[5]  B. Heller,et al.  A comparative evaluation of oxygen consumption and gait pattern in amputees using Intelligent Prostheses and conventionally damped knee swing-phase control , 2005, Clinical rehabilitation.

[6]  Jun-Ho Oh,et al.  Development of an above knee prosthesis using MR damper and leg simulator , 2001, Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164).

[7]  C. A. Putnam,et al.  A segment interaction analysis of proximal-to-distal sequential segment motion patterns. , 1991, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[8]  James Kennedy,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 2002, Proceedings of ICNN'95 - International Conference on Neural Networks.

[9]  H. Herr,et al.  A Clinical Comparison of Variable-Damping and Mechanically Passive Prosthetic Knee Devices , 2005, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[10]  Hugh Herr,et al.  User-adaptive control of a magnetorheological prosthetic knee , 2003, Ind. Robot.

[11]  V D Kalanovic,et al.  Feedback error learning neural network for trans-femoral prosthesis. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[12]  Mohammad Bagher Menhaj,et al.  Training feedforward networks with the Marquardt algorithm , 1994, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[13]  Joseph Hamill,et al.  An Alternative Model of the Lower Extremity during Locomotion , 1996 .

[14]  Auke Jan Ijspeert,et al.  Development of Adaptive Modular Active Leg (AMAL) using bipedal robotics technology , 2009, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[15]  Kenton R Kaufman,et al.  Gait asymmetry of transfemoral amputees using mechanical and microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees. , 2012, Clinical biomechanics.

[16]  Y. Dabiri,et al.  Comparison of passive and active prosthetic knee joint kinematics during swing phase of gait , 2010, 2010 17th Iranian Conference of Biomedical Engineering (ICBME).

[17]  Itthisek Nilkhamhang,et al.  A novel approach to model magneto-rheological dampers using EHM with a feed-forward neural network , 2012 .

[18]  N. Ordway,et al.  Comparison Between the C-leg® Microprocessor-Controlled Prosthetic Knee and Non-Microprocessor Control Prosthetic Knees: A Preliminary Study of Energy Expenditure, Obstacle Course Performance, and Quality of Life Survey , 2007, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[19]  R. Eberhart,et al.  Comparing inertia weights and constriction factors in particle swarm optimization , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC00 (Cat. No.00TH8512).

[20]  Octavian Pastravanu,et al.  A neural predictive controller for non-linear systems , 2002, Math. Comput. Simul..

[21]  Albert Cheung,et al.  Active Prosthetic Knee Fuzzy Logic - PID Motion Control, Sensors and Test Platform Design , 2011 .

[22]  Sneh Anand,et al.  ANFIS based knee angle prediction: An approach to design speed adaptive contra lateral controlled AK prosthesis , 2011, Appl. Soft Comput..

[23]  Itthisek Nilkhamhang,et al.  Force control of a magnetorheological damper using an elementary hysteresis model-based feedforward neural network , 2013 .