Perception of Tilt and Ocular Torsion of Normal Human Subjects During Eccentric Rotation

Hypothesis The authors hypothesized that a nonvisual measure of the subjective horizontal during eccentric rotation is a reliable method for evaluating the spatial orientation of normal subjects during such rotation. Background Eccentric rotation is a promising tool for the evaluation of otolithic function in healthy subjects and in patients. Although eye torsion is an objective measurement, it is also affected by angular acceleration/deceleration. Subjective horizontal is more accurately related to the changes in linear acceleration, but visual judgments of orientation are confounded by ocular torsion. Methods 20 subjects were tested during eccentric yaw rotation in both directions, generating centripetal acceleration directed along the interaural axis ranging from 0.38 g to 1 g. Perception of body tilt in roll and in pitch was recorded in darkness using verbal reports and a somatosensory plate that the subjects maintained parallel to the perceived horizon. Torsion of the eyes was recorded by a video camera. Results Perceived roll tilt was close to the tilt of the gravito-inertial acceleration vector. However, there were differences in perceived roll and pitch tilt between facing-motion and back-to-motion headings, presumably related to the direction of the tangential acceleration. Ocular torsion was dependent on both angular and centripetal accelerations. Conclusions Measurement of perceived roll and pitch tilt using a somatosensory plate is a reproducible method for quantifying the effects of linear accelerations during eccentric rotation. This method may prove useful for the diagnosis of otolithic dysfunction in dizziness and in patients with vestibular disorders.

[1]  J. Goldberg,et al.  Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. I. Response to static tilts and to long-duration centrifugal force. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  A. Graybiel,et al.  Factors contributing to the delay in the perception of the oculogravic illusion. , 1966, The American journal of psychology.

[3]  A GRAYBIEL,et al.  THE EFFECT OF CHANGING THE RESULTANT LINEAR ACCELERATION RELATIVE TO THE SUBJECT ON NYSTAGMUS GENERATED BY ANGULAR ACCELERATION. , 1964, Aeromedica acta.

[4]  M. Sanders Handbook of Sensory Physiology , 1975 .

[5]  Bernard Cohen,et al.  Otolith function in spatial orientation and movement , 1999 .

[6]  I. Curthoys,et al.  Clinical Testing of Otolith Function , 1999, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[7]  S. Glasauer,et al.  Modelling Three-Dimensional Vestibular Responses During Complex Motion Stimulation , 1997 .

[8]  S. H. Seidman,et al.  Tilt perception during dynamic linear acceleration , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  Ian S. Curthoys,et al.  The role of ocular torsion in visual measures of vestibular function , 1996, Brain Research Bulletin.

[10]  F. Guedry Psychophysics of Vestibular Sensation , 1974 .

[11]  A. Graybiel,et al.  The Delay in Visual Reorientation following Exposure to a Change in Direction of Resultant Force on a Human Centrifuge , 1951 .

[12]  Steven T. Moore,et al.  A geometric basis for measurement of three-dimensional eye position using image processing , 1996, Vision Research.

[13]  F. Mast,et al.  The effect of water immersion on postural and visual orientation. , 1999, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[14]  F. Guedry Perception of Motion and Position Relative to the Earth: An Overview , 1992, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Ian S. Curthoys,et al.  The delay of the oculogravic illusion , 1996, Brain Research Bulletin.

[16]  I. Curthoys,et al.  Linear Acceleration Modulates the Nystagmus Induced by Angular Acceleration Stimulation of the Horizontal Canal a , 1992, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[17]  I. Curthoys,et al.  The Effect of Ocular Torsional Position on Perception of the Roll-tilt of Visual Stimuli , 1997, Vision Research.

[18]  V Honrubia,et al.  Clinical Neurophysiology of the Vestibular System , 1980, Neurology.

[19]  T. Haslwanter,et al.  A theoretical analysis of three-dimensional eye position measurement using polar cross-correlation , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  L. Zupan,et al.  Neural processing of gravito-inertial cues in humans. II. Influence of the semicircular canals during eccentric rotation. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  H. Mittelstaedt A new solution to the problem of the subjective vertical , 1983, Naturwissenschaften.

[22]  A. Tribukait Semicircular canal and saccular influence on the subjective visual horizontal during gondola centrifugation. , 1999, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[23]  B. Cohen,et al.  Perception of tilt (somatogravic illusion) in response to sustained linear acceleration during space flight , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  F E Guedry,et al.  The dynamics of spatial orientation during complex and changing linear and angular acceleration. , 1992, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[25]  Fred H. Previc,et al.  Spatial Orientation in Flight , 1993 .

[26]  Theodore Raphan,et al.  Ocular counterrolling induced by centrifugation during orbital space flight , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  I. Curthoys,et al.  The human ocular torsion position response during yaw angular acceleration , 1995, Vision Research.

[28]  H. A. U. D. Haes,et al.  Interaction between statolith organs and semicircular canals on apparent vertical and nystagmus. Investigations on the effectiveness of the statolith organs. , 1970, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[29]  C. Oman,et al.  Vestibulo-ocular response of human subjects seated in a pivoting support system during 3 Gz centrifuge stimulation. , 1995, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[30]  I. Curthoys,et al.  Human otolithic function before and after unilateral vestibular neurectomy. , 1990, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.