Effective Extraction of Gabor Features for False Positive Reduction and Mass Classification in Mammography

Digital mammography is considered to be the most effective imaging modality for early detection of breast cancer. Masses and microcalcifications are two early signs of breast cancer. For the detection of masses, segmentation of mammograms results in ROIs (regions of interest) which not only include masses but suspicious normal tissues as well, which lead to false positives. The problem is to reduce the false positives by classifying ROIs as masses and normal tissues. In addition, the detected masses are required to be classified as malignant and benign. We address these two problems using textural properties of masses. Gabor filter bank is used in a novel way to extract the most representative and discriminative textural properties of masses present at different orientations and scales. SVM with Gaussian kernel is employed for classification. The method is evaluated over 1024 (512 masses and 512 normal) ROIs extracted from DDSM database. Experiments have been performed with different parameter settings to find the best set of parameters. Gabor filter Banks with different choices of orientations (3, 5, 6, 8) and scales (2, 3, 4, 5) have been tested on 4 ROI resolutions (64×64, 128×128, 256×256, 512×512). For the first problem i.e. to classify ROIs as masses and normal tissues, the best result (Az = 0.96±0.02) is obtained when Gabor filter bank with 5 orientations and 3 scales and RIOs with size 512×512 is used. Gabor filter bank with 8 orientations and 5 scales on mass ROIs of size 128×128 gives the best result (Az = 0.87±0.05) for the second problem (i.e. to classify mass ROIs as benign and malignant). Comparison with state-of-the-art methods reveals that the proposed method performs better than the existing methods.

[1]  Béla Pataki,et al.  A hybrid system for detecting masses in mammographic images , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[2]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[3]  Anselmo Cardoso de Paiva,et al.  Detection of masses in mammogram images using CNN, geostatistic functions and SVM , 2011, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[4]  Defeng Wang,et al.  Automatic detection of breast cancers in mammograms using structured support vector machines , 2009, Neurocomputing.

[5]  Asoke K. Nandi,et al.  Toward breast cancer diagnosis based on automated segmentation of masses in mammograms , 2009, Pattern Recognit..

[6]  Nicolai Petkov,et al.  Nonlinear operator for oriented texture , 1999, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[7]  Xinbo Gao,et al.  A Feature Analysis Approach to Mass Detection in Mammography Based on RF-SVM , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[8]  B. S. Manjunath,et al.  Texture Features for Browsing and Retrieval of Image Data , 1996, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[9]  Uday B. Desai,et al.  An unsupervised scheme for detection of microcalcifications on mammograms , 2000, Proceedings 2000 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.00CH37101).

[10]  S. García,et al.  An Extension on "Statistical Comparisons of Classifiers over Multiple Data Sets" for all Pairwise Comparisons , 2008 .

[11]  Nicolai Petkov,et al.  Comparison of texture features based on Gabor filters , 1999, Proceedings 10th International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing.

[12]  Wen Gao,et al.  Hierarchical Ensemble of Global and Local Classifiers for Face Recognition , 2007, 2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision.

[13]  Wen Gao,et al.  Hierarchical Ensemble of Global and Local Classifiers for Face Recognition , 2009, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[14]  Bernhard E. Boser,et al.  A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers , 1992, COLT '92.

[15]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  A Practical Guide to Support Vector Classication , 2008 .

[16]  Richard H. Moore,et al.  THE DIGITAL DATABASE FOR SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY , 2007 .

[17]  Christopher J. C. Burges,et al.  A Tutorial on Support Vector Machines for Pattern Recognition , 1998, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.

[18]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  Statistical learning theory , 1998 .

[19]  Alexandre César Muniz de Oliveira,et al.  Classification of breast tissues using Moran's index and Geary's coefficient as texture signatures and SVM , 2009, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[20]  Arnau Oliver,et al.  A review of automatic mass detection and segmentation in mammographic images , 2010, Medical Image Anal..

[21]  Yongyi Yang,et al.  Computer-Aided Detection and Diagnosis of Breast Cancer With Mammography: Recent Advances , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[22]  Zehang Sun,et al.  Monocular precrash vehicle detection: features and classifiers , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[23]  A. K. Barros,et al.  Classification of breast tissue in mammograms using efficient coding , 2011, Biomedical engineering online.

[24]  Salim Lahmiri,et al.  Hybrid discrete wavelet transform and Gabor filter banks processing for mammogram features extraction , 2011, 2011 IEEE 9th International New Circuits and systems conference.

[25]  Janez Demsar,et al.  Statistical Comparisons of Classifiers over Multiple Data Sets , 2006, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[26]  Galina L. Rogova,et al.  Microcalcification texture analysis in a hybrid system for computer-aided mammography , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[27]  Xavier Lladó,et al.  A textural approach for mass false positive reduction in mammography , 2009, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[28]  Zohreh Azimifar,et al.  Contourlet-based mammography mass classification using the SVM family , 2010, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[29]  Samir Brahim Belhaouari,et al.  Breast cancer diagnosis in digital mammogram using multiscale curvelet transform , 2010, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[30]  Yufeng Zheng,et al.  Breast Cancer Detection with Gabor Features from Digital Mammograms , 2010, Algorithms.

[31]  M. R. Turner,et al.  Texture discrimination by Gabor functions , 1986, Biological Cybernetics.

[32]  J. Daugman Two-dimensional spectral analysis of cortical receptive field profiles , 1980, Vision Research.

[33]  M. Elter,et al.  CADx of mammographic masses and clustered microcalcifications: a review. , 2009, Medical physics.

[34]  P. Cochat,et al.  Et al , 2008, Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie.

[35]  N. Petrick,et al.  Classification of mass and normal breast tissue on digital mammograms: multiresolution texture analysis. , 1995, Medical physics.

[36]  Ioan Buciu,et al.  Directional features for automatic tumor classification of mammogram images , 2011, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[37]  Anselmo Cardoso de Paiva,et al.  Detection of masses in mammographic images using geometry, Simpson's Diversity Index and SVM , 2010 .