Affect, cognition, and awareness: affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures.

The affective primacy hypothesis (R. B. Zajonc, 1980) asserts that positive and negative affective reactions can be evoked with minimal stimulus input and virtually no cognitive processing. The present work tested this hypothesis by comparing the effects of affective and cognitive priming under extremely brief (suboptimal) and longer (optimal) exposure durations. At suboptimal exposures only affective primes produced significant shifts in Ss' judgments of novel stimuli. These results suggest that when affect is elicited outside of conscious awareness, it is diffuse and nonspecific, and its origin and address are not accessible. Having minimal cognitive participation, such gross and nonspecific affective reactions can therefore be diffused or displaced onto unrelated stimuli. At optimal exposures this pattern of results was reversed such that only cognitive primes produced significant shifts in judgments. Together, these results support the affective primacy hypothesis.

[1]  H. Klüver,et al.  "Psychic blindness" and other symptoms following bilateral temporal lobectomy in Rhesus monkeys. , 1937 .

[2]  E. McGinnies.  Emotionality and perceptual defense. , 1949, Psychological review.

[3]  C. Pallis.  IMPAIRED IDENTIFICATION OF FACES AND PLACES WITH AGNOSIA FOR COLOURS , 1955, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[4]  D. Spence,et al.  Subliminal effects of verbal stimuli. , 1959, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[5]  M. Eagle.  The effects of subliminal stimuli of aggressive content upon conscious cognition. , 1959, Journal of personality.

[6]  C. Fisher,et al.  SUBLIMINAL VISUAL STIMULATION: A STUDY OF ITS INFLUENCE ON SUBSEQUENT IMAGES AND DREAMS , 1959, Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease.

[7]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Discrimination and learning without awareness: a methodological survey and evaluation. , 1960, Psychological review.

[8]  D. Spence,et al.  The restricting effects of awareness: a paradox and an explanation. , 1962, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[9]  R. Zajonc.  Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[10]  R. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  P. Ekman.  Universals and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion. , 1972 .

[12]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[13]  Allan Collins,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .

[14]  JANOS KURUCZ,et al.  Prosopo‐Affective Agnosia Associated with Chronic Organic Brain Syndrome , 1979, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[15]  J Kurucz,et al.  Prosopo‐Affective Agnosia as a Symptom of Cerebral Organic Disease , 1979, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[16]  G. Mandler.  Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. , 1980 .

[17]  C W Eriksen,et al.  The use of a visual mask may seriously confound your experiment , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  R. Zajonc.  Feeling and thinking : Preferences need no inferences , 1980 .

[19]  L. Jacoby,et al.  On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[20]  Carol A. Fowler,et al.  Lexical access with and without awareness , 1981 .

[21]  U. Dimberg.  Facial reactions to facial expressions. , 1982, Psychophysiology.

[22]  J. Bargh.  Attention and Automaticity in the Processing of Self-Relevant Information , 1982 .

[23]  T. Carr,et al.  Words, pictures, and priming: on semantic activation, conscious identification, and the automaticity of information processing. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  R. Lazarus.  Thoughts on the relations between emotion and cognition. , 1982 .

[25]  T. Field,et al.  Discrimination and imitation of facial expression by neonates. , 1982, Science.

[26]  N. Brody,et al.  Affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized: II. Effect of delay between study and test , 1983 .

[27]  D G Purcell,et al.  Another look at semantic priming without awareness , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  P. Merikle.  Subliminal perception reaffirmed. , 1983 .

[29]  N. Brody,et al.  Critical importance of exposure duration for affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  R. Zajonc.  On the primacy of affect. , 1984 .

[31]  R. Bauer,et al.  Autonomic recognition of names and faces in prosopagnosia: A neuropsychological application of the guilty knowledge test , 1984, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  A. Damasio,et al.  Knowledge without awareness: an autonomic index of facial recognition by prosopagnosics. , 1985, Science.

[33]  J. Weinberger,et al.  Mommy and I are one. Implications for psychotherapy. , 1985, The American psychologist.

[34]  J. Bargh,et al.  Nature of Priming Effects on Categorization , 1985 .

[35]  P. Merikle,et al.  Distinguishing conscious from unconscious perceptual processes. , 1986, Canadian journal of psychology.

[36]  Joseph E LeDoux,et al.  Intrinsic neurons in the amygdaloid field projected to by the medial geniculate body mediate emotional responses conditioned to acoustic stimuli , 1986, Brain Research.

[37]  Joseph E. LeDoux,et al.  Sensory systems and emotion: A model of affective processing , 1986 .

[38]  David M. Sanbonmatsu,et al.  On the automatic activation of attitudes. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[39]  Joseph E. LeDoux,et al.  Cardiovascular responses elicited by stimulation of neurons in the central amygdaloid nucleus in awake but not anesthetized rats resemble conditioned emotional responses , 1987, Brain Research.

[40]  Joseph E LeDoux,et al.  Different projections of the central amygdaloid nucleus mediate autonomic and behavioral correlates of conditioned fear , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[41]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A retrieval theory of priming in memory. , 1988, Psychological review.

[42]  Nathan Brody,et al.  Personality in Search of Individuality , 1988 .

[43]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  Measures of Memory , 1988 .

[44]  Bischof's passionate confusion concerning the emotions. , 1989 .

[45]  A. Öhman,et al.  Preattentive activation of aversive emotions , 1989 .

[46]  L. Nilsson,et al.  Aversion, avoidance, and anxiety : perspective on aversively motivated behavior , 1989 .

[47]  A G Greenwald,et al.  Unconscious processing of dichoptically masked words , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[48]  Unconscious affect in social cognition , 1989 .

[49]  Joseph E LeDoux.  Information flow from sensation to emotion: Plasticity in the neural computation of stimulus value. , 1990 .

[50]  E Tulving,et al.  Priming and human memory systems. , 1990, Science.

[51]  S. Murphy.  The primacy of affect: Evidence and extension. , 1990 .

[52]  H L Roediger,et al.  Implicit memory. Retention without remembering. , 1990, The American psychologist.

[53]  L. Squire,et al.  Independence of memory functions and emotional behavior: Separate contributions of the hippocampal formation and the amygdala , 1991, Hippocampus.

[54]  Eyal M. Reingold,et al.  Comparing Direct (Explicit) and Indirect (Implicit) Measures to Study Unconscious Memory , 1991 .

[55]  Shinobu Kitayama,et al.  Impairment of perception by positive and negative affect , 1991 .

[56]  R. Kronauer,et al.  Affective Discrimination of Stimuli That Cannot Be Recognized , 2022 .