Designing Playful Interactive Installations for Urban Environments - The SwingScape Experience

This paper discusses design issues in the development of playful outdoor interactive installations featuring kinesthetic interaction and immersive music experiences. The research is based on the development and evaluation of the novel SwingScape installation, which is a permanent installation at an urban playground. The objectives of SwingScape are to encourage physical activity as well as creating a playful and social experience in an urban space. The interaction techniques include movement sensors built into swings, LED lights, and an ambient loudspeaker system covering approx. 180 square meters. The design issues include: creating playful and collective interaction, making a familiar swing interaction simulate the experience of a music mixing board, providing gentle integration of multimedia (light and sound) in the atmosphere of an urban space, and finally making installations robust and safe for an urban outdoor setting. The SwingScape installation has been developed in three phases for quite different urban settings, and the experiences from these are generalised to contribute to a foundation for design of interactive urban installations.

[1]  Michael Sannella,et al.  Constraint satisfaction and debugging for interactive user interfaces , 1994 .

[2]  Bernd Fröhlich,et al.  The cubic mouse: a new device for three-dimensional input , 2000, CHI.

[3]  Kaj Grønbæk,et al.  Interactive spatial multimedia for communication of art in the physical museum space , 2008, ACM Multimedia.

[4]  Philip Tavel,et al.  Modeling and Simulation Design , 2011 .

[5]  Sriram Subramanian,et al.  Talking about tactile experiences , 2013, CHI.

[6]  Philippe A. Palanque,et al.  Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2007 , 2007, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[7]  A. Z. Spector,et al.  Achieving application requirements , 1990 .

[8]  Hong Hua,et al.  A widget framework for augmented interaction in SCAPE , 2003, UIST '03.

[9]  Nick Montfort,et al.  The New Media Reader , 2003 .

[10]  Mark Blythe,et al.  Funology:From Usability to Enjoyment , 2003 .

[11]  Jonas Fritsch,et al.  Kinesthetic interaction: revealing the bodily potential in interaction design , 2008, OZCHI '08.

[12]  Dirk Van Hulle.  Noah Wardrip-Fruin & Nick Montfort (eds.): The new media reader , 2005 .

[13]  Sape Mullender,et al.  Distributed systems , 1989 .

[14]  Larry L. Peterson,et al.  Reasoning about naming systems , 1993, TOPL.

[15]  Yuen-Tak Yu,et al.  A comparison of MC/DC, MUMCUT and several other coverage criteria for logical decisions , 2006, J. Syst. Softw..

[16]  George Forman,et al.  An Extensive Empirical Study of Feature Selection Metrics for Text Classification , 2003, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[17]  Myron W. Krueger,et al.  Responsive environments , 1977, AFIPS '77.

[18]  Martin Ludvigsen,et al.  Aesthetic interaction: a pragmatist's aesthetics of interactive systems , 2004, DIS '04.

[19]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  PingPong++: community customization in games and entertainment , 2011, Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology.

[20]  Kim Halskov,et al.  Designing urban media façades: cases and challenges , 2010, CHI.

[21]  Kaj Grønbæk,et al.  Interactive Floor Support for Kinesthetic Interaction in Children Learning Environments , 2007, INTERACT.