Videoconferencing and learning in the classroom : the effects of being an Orphan Technology?

Drawing on a decade of evaluation research into videoconferencing in English schools, this paper explores the relative lack of pedagogical innovation in the educational application of videoconferencing. Initial surveys on the frequency and patterns of use of videoconferencing provided baseline data for selected case studies involving in-depth interviews with key personnel involved in the deployment of videoconferencing and observations of lessons in which videoconferencing was being used. Data analysis reveals that the main models of videoconferencing use were either ‘substitution’ (videoconferencing replacing face-to-face curriculum delivery) or ‘enhancement’ (whereby videoconferencing augments traditional pedagogical practices). Examples of ‘adaptive’ use (exploring the innovative potential of videoconferencing) were relatively rare. This apparent conservatism, at odds with the emergence of shifting pedagogies with other ICT tools, was allied to videoconferencing being positioned as an ‘orphan’ technology, whereby interested teachers were offered quasi-autonomy – that is, power to innovate was limited by highly localised policy and curricular systems. The authors conclude that for videoconferencing to enter the mainstream of school ICT provision, wider learning benefits need to be demonstrated to a broader audience, so that videoconferencing can reach its transformative potential. Ways to achieve this are presented.

[1]  H. Boeije A Purposeful Approach to the Constant Comparative Method in the Analysis of Qualitative Interviews , 2002 .

[2]  Marie Martin,et al.  Instructional design of a distance education cultural awareness course to enhance currency and authenticity , 2011, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[3]  J. Mezirow Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning , 1991 .

[4]  Alan Pritchard,et al.  Case study investigation of a videoconferencing experiment in primary schools, teaching modern foreign languages , 2010 .

[5]  S. Harris,et al.  Innovative pedagogical practices using ICT in schools in England , 2002, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[6]  P. R. Fleming,et al.  The Charing Cross and Westminster Interactive Television Network , 1989 .

[7]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[8]  Tony Lawson,et al.  Sustaining technological innovation: The example of videoconferencing in English Schools , 2012, Education and Information Technologies.

[9]  Gary Beauchamp,et al.  Reviewing the literature on interactive whiteboards , 2007 .

[10]  Raymond Luis Barber Self-Contained Virtual Field Trips in Community Science Through Point-to-Point Videoconferencing , 2010 .

[11]  R. Smyth Exploring the usefulness of a conceptual framework as a research tool: a researcher's reflections. , 2004 .

[12]  Eva Hornecker artec,et al.  Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education ( AACE ) . Distributed via the Web by permission of AACE Coupling Physical Artifacts , 2022 .

[13]  Karina J. Wilkie Academic continuity through online collaboration: mathematics teachers support the learning of pupils with chronic illness during school absence , 2011, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[14]  N. Hoffart Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[15]  M. Moore The Theory of Transactional Distance , 2012, Handbook of Distance Education.

[16]  Gee Macrory,et al.  Technologically enhanced language learning in primary schools in England, France and Spain: developing linguistic competence in a technologically enhanced classroom environment , 2012 .

[17]  Kristi Jauregi,et al.  Virtual interaction through video-web communication: A step towards enriching and internationalizing language learning programs , 2008, ReCALL.

[18]  Tony Lawson,et al.  Education for Managing ICT: Professional Development for School Leaders , 2003 .

[19]  Glenn A. Bowen Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: a research note , 2008 .

[20]  Neil Pitcher,et al.  Videoconferencing in Higher Education , 2000 .

[21]  Barbara L. McCombs,et al.  Enhancing Distance Learning for Today's Youth with Learner-Centered Principles. , 2008 .

[22]  Dianna L. Newman,et al.  Documenting Value Added Learning Through Videoconferencing: K-12 Classrooms’ Interactions with Museums , 2005 .

[23]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Through a Glass Darkly What Do People Learn in Videoconferences , 1995 .

[24]  Lawrence Williams Videoconferencing across the curriculum , 2012 .

[25]  Qing Li,et al.  Using Videoconferencing to Provide Mentorship in Inquiry-Based Urban and Rural Secondary Classrooms , 2010 .

[26]  Peter Knight,et al.  Self‐theories: some implications for teaching and learning in higher education , 2004 .

[27]  Chris Comber,et al.  ImpaCT2: learning at home and school: case studies , 2002 .

[28]  Noraida Abdul Ghani,et al.  The videoconferencing learning environment: Technology, interaction and learning intersect , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[29]  Michael Marek,et al.  Using Online EFL Interaction to Increase Confidence, Motivation, and Ability , 2011, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[30]  Lauren Cifuentes,et al.  Promoting multicultural understanding and positive self-concept through a distance learning community: Cultural connections , 2000 .

[31]  Panagiotes S. Anastasiades,et al.  Interactive Videoconferencing for collaborative learning at a distance in the school of 21st century: A case study in elementary schools in Greece , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[32]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Desktop Videoconferencing as a Basis for Computer Supported Collaborative Learning in K-12 Classrooms , 1999 .

[33]  Cathy Gunn,et al.  Sustainability factors for e-learning initiatives , 2010 .

[34]  J. Creswell,et al.  Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design , 1998 .

[35]  T. Andrews,et al.  Extending Learning Opportunities through a Virtual Faculty-The Videoconference Option. , 2002 .

[36]  Marie Martin,et al.  Seeing is believing: the role of videoconferencing in distance learning , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[37]  Richard Thorpe,et al.  The use of personal video conferencing with special needs pupils from three schools serving rural areas: a case of successful adoption of new technology , 1998 .

[38]  Jukka Husu Supporting remote communities with a shared virtual classroom: a view of social contexts , 2000 .

[39]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[40]  Richard E. Boyatzis,et al.  Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development , 1998 .

[41]  S. Livingstone Critical reflections on the benefits of ICT in education , 2012 .

[42]  Dawn Birch,et al.  Bringing academics on board: encouraging institution-wide diffusion of e-learning environments , 2009 .

[43]  John E. Mitchell,et al.  Interacting at a distance: Staff and student perceptions of teaching and learning via video conferencing , 1993 .

[44]  Sara Dexter,et al.  School Technology Leadership: An Empirical Investigation of Prevalence and Effect , 2005 .

[45]  Lynne M. Pachnowski Virtual Field Trips through Video Conferencing. , 2002 .