Examining fidelity of program implementation in a STEM-oriented out-of-school setting

In the United States and many other countries there is a growing emphasis on science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education that is expanding the number of both in-school and out-of-school instructional programs targeting important STEM outcomes. As instructional leaders increasingly train teachers and facilitators to undertake new STEM focused programs, it will become especially important for these leaders to understand the concept of program fidelity, which seeks to examine the alignment between how a program is designed to be implemented and how that program is actually implemented in the field. This article discusses an exploratory study examining program fidelity within the geospatial and robotics technologies for the twenty-first century (GEAR-Tech-21) project, which is an out-of-school program teaching educational robotics and geospatial-related STEM concepts, across more than 20 different states, as funded by the National Science Foundation. The study results identified relationships related to program fidelity that were identifiable across various instructional modules, and associated with specific training and content characteristics.

[1]  Alice K. Wiggins,et al.  Preschool teachers' fidelity in implementing a comprehensive language-rich curriculum. , 2008, Language, speech, and hearing services in schools.

[2]  Susan M. Sheridan,et al.  Fidelity Measurement in Consultation: Psychometric Issues and Preliminary Examination. , 2009 .

[3]  Joseph A. Durlak,et al.  Why Program Implementation is Important , 1998 .

[4]  Viacheslav I. Adamchuk,et al.  Robots in K-12 Education: A New Technology for Learning , 2012 .

[5]  J. Vermunt The regulation of constructive learning processes , 1998 .

[6]  H. Dekkers,et al.  Cross‐national differences in participating in tertiary science, technology, engineering and mathematics education , 2005 .

[7]  Pak Tee Ng How the world’s most improved school systems keep getting better , 2011 .

[8]  Bradley S. Barker,et al.  Impact of Robotics and Geospatial Technology Interventions on Youth STEM Learning and Attitudes , 2010 .

[9]  Helen R. Quinn,et al.  A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2013 .

[10]  Amy Eguchi,et al.  Educational Robotics Theories and Practice: Tips for how to do it Right , 2012 .

[11]  Sharlene Woffinden,et al.  Experiential Learning, Just Do It! , 2001 .

[12]  Andrew Shouse,et al.  Learning science in informal environments : people, places, and pursuits , 2009 .

[13]  Va Arlington National Science Board. , 2010 .

[14]  Mona Mourshed,et al.  How the worlds most improved school systems keep getting better , 2011 .

[15]  Jeanne Century,et al.  A Framework for Measuring Fidelity of Implementation: A Foundation for Shared Language and Accumulation of Knowledge , 2010 .

[16]  D. Kolb Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[17]  C. Knox-Quinn International Society for Technology in Education. , 1992 .

[18]  Gary Hoachlander,et al.  Making STEM Real. , 2011 .

[19]  D. Hallfors,et al.  Fidelity of implementation in a treatment effectiveness trial of Reconnecting Youth. , 2006, Health education research.

[20]  Bradley Barker,et al.  The impact of educational robotics on student STEM learning, attitudes, and workplace skills , 2012 .

[21]  Léonie J. Rennie,et al.  The nature of learning and its implications for research on learning from museums , 2004 .

[22]  J. Creswell Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. , 1998 .

[23]  V. Rideout,et al.  Generation M2: Media in the Lives of 8- to 18-Year-Olds , 2010 .

[24]  Susan Brooks-Young,et al.  National Educational Technology Standards for Students , 2007 .

[25]  Joseph C. Witt,et al.  Treatment Implementation Following Behavioral Consultation in Schools: A Comparison of Three Follow-up Strategies , 2005 .

[26]  J. Shea National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[27]  G Wiggins,et al.  Understanding by design (expanded 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[28]  Bradley S. Barker,et al.  Robotics as Means to Increase Achievement Scores in an Informal Learning Environment , 2007 .

[29]  A. Su,et al.  The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics , 1932, The Mathematical Gazette.