Twenty years of research on technology in mathematics education at CERME: a literature review based on a data science approach

[1]  S. Leonard,et al.  Technology enhanced learning environments and the potential for enhancing spatial reasoning: a mixed methods study , 2021, Mathematics Education Research Journal.

[2]  Haoran Xie,et al.  Detecting latent topics and trends in educational technologies over four decades using structural topic modeling: A retrospective of all volumes of Computers & Education , 2020, Comput. Educ..

[3]  Colin Foster,et al.  A comparative synthesis of UK mathematics education research: what are we talking about and do we align with international discourse? , 2020 .

[4]  Mirco Musolesi,et al.  Modelling Grocery Retail Topic Distributions: Evaluation, Interpretability and Stability , 2020, ArXiv.

[5]  Daniela Stoltenberg,et al.  How Document Sampling and Vocabulary Pruning Affect the Results of Topic Models , 2019, Computational Communication Research.

[6]  Charles Møller,et al.  Smart literature review: a practical topic modelling approach to exploratory literature review , 2019, Journal of Big Data.

[7]  Yaxin Bi,et al.  Aggregated topic models for increasing social media topic coherence , 2019, Applied Intelligence.

[8]  Zsolt Lavicza,et al.  Silent video tasks: Towards a definition , 2019 .

[9]  Jan Wörler.  How to distinguish simulations? Development of a classification scheme for digital simulations for teaching and learning mathematics , 2019 .

[10]  C. Buteau,et al.  Students’ Process and Strategies as They Program for Mathematical Investigations and Applications , 2019 .

[11]  M. Inglis,et al.  Mathematics Teacher Professional Journals: What Topics Appear and How Has This Changed over Time? , 2018, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education.

[12]  Matthew Inglis,et al.  Five Decades of Mathematics Education Research , 2018, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education.

[13]  T. Dreyfus,et al.  Developing Research in Mathematics Education : Twenty Years of Communication, Cooperation and Collaboration in Europe , 2018 .

[14]  Silke Adam,et al.  Applying LDA Topic Modeling in Communication Research: Toward a Valid and Reliable Methodology , 2018 .

[15]  André Bittermann,et al.  How to Identify Hot Topics in Psychology Using Topic Modeling , 2018 .

[16]  Arthur Spirling,et al.  Text Preprocessing For Unsupervised Learning: Why It Matters, When It Misleads, And What To Do About It , 2017, Political Analysis.

[17]  Laure Thompson,et al.  Quantifying the Effects of Text Duplication on Semantic Models , 2017, EMNLP.

[18]  David M. Mimno,et al.  Applications of Topic Models , 2017, Found. Trends Inf. Retr..

[19]  Måns Magnusson,et al.  Pulling Out the Stops: Rethinking Stopword Removal for Topic Models , 2017, EACL.

[20]  D. Diamantidis,et al.  Meaning-generation through an interplay between problem solving and constructionism in the C-book technology environment , 2017 .

[21]  David M. Mimno,et al.  Comparing Apples to Apple: The Effects of Stemmers on Topic Models , 2016, TACL.

[22]  B. Tangney,et al.  Enhancing student engagement through the affordances of mobile technology: a 21st century learning perspective on Realistic Mathematics Education , 2015, Mathematics Education Research Journal.

[23]  Wray L. Buntine,et al.  Twitter Opinion Topic Model: Extracting Product Opinions from Tweets by Leveraging Hashtags and Sentiment Lexicon , 2014, CIKM.

[24]  Margaret L. Niess,et al.  A Survey of Mathematics Education Technology Dissertation Scope and Quality , 2014 .

[25]  Kenneth E. Shirley,et al.  LDAvis: A method for visualizing and interpreting topics , 2014 .

[26]  Timothy Baldwin,et al.  Machine Reading Tea Leaves: Automatically Evaluating Topic Coherence and Topic Model Quality , 2014, EACL.

[27]  David G. Rand,et al.  Structural Topic Models for Open‐Ended Survey Responses , 2014, American Journal of Political Science.

[28]  Shawn Graham,et al.  Getting Started with Topic Modeling and MALLET , 2012 .

[29]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Probabilistic topic models , 2011, KDD '11 Tutorials.

[30]  David M. Mimno,et al.  Computational historiography: Data mining in a century of classics journals , 2012, JOCCH.

[31]  Andrew McCallum,et al.  Optimizing Semantic Coherence in Topic Models , 2011, EMNLP.

[32]  Christopher S. G. Khoo,et al.  Analysis of the Macro-Level Discourse Structure of Literature Reviews , 2011, Online Inf. Rev..

[33]  Hans-Georg Weigand,et al.  INTRODUCTION TO THE PAPERS OF WG15 , 2011 .

[34]  Michael J. Paul,et al.  Topic Modeling of Research Fields: An Interdisciplinary Perspective , 2009, RANLP.

[35]  T. Erren,et al.  How to surf today's information tsunami: on the craft of effective reading. , 2009, Medical hypotheses.

[36]  Ruslan Salakhutdinov,et al.  Evaluation methods for topic models , 2009, ICML '09.

[37]  A. Booth,et al.  A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. , 2009, Health information and libraries journal.

[38]  Mathieu Bastian,et al.  Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks , 2009, ICWSM.

[39]  John D. Lafferty,et al.  A correlated topic model of Science , 2007, 0708.3601.

[40]  T. Griffiths,et al.  Finding scientific topics , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  H. B. Mann.  Nonparametric Tests Against Trend , 1945 .

[42]  C. Kynigos,et al.  Teachers designing e-books to foster creative mathematical thinking: the case of curvature , 2020 .

[43]  M. Heuvel-Panhuizen,et al.  Proceedings of the Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education , 2020 .

[44]  Mario Sánchez Aguilar,et al.  Digital Technology in Mathematics Education: Research over the Last Decade , 2017 .

[45]  B. Kissane,et al.  Review of the use of technology in Mathematics education , 2015 .

[46]  Susanne Prediger,et al.  Networking of theories as a research practice in mathematics education , 2014 .

[47]  Nitish Srivastava,et al.  Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting , 2014, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[48]  Julian Williams,et al.  Modelling with Mathematics and Technologies , 2012 .

[49]  Allen Leung,et al.  From the Slate to the Web: Technology in the Mathematics Curriculum , 2012 .

[50]  Dragomir R. Radev,et al.  How to Analyze Political Attention with Minimal Assumptions and Costs , 2010 .

[51]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Latent Dirichlet Allocation , 2009 .

[52]  Christopher D. Manning,et al.  Topic Modeling for the Social Sciences , 2009 .

[53]  Volker Ulm,et al.  Systemic Innovations of Mathematics Education with Dynamic Worksheets as Catalysts , 2009 .

[54]  Teresa Assude.  Teacher’s practices and degree of ICT integration , 2007 .

[55]  Anne Berit Fuglestad,et al.  DEVELOPING TASKS AND TEACHING WITH ICT IN MATHEMATICS IN AN INQUIRY COMMUNITY , 2007 .

[56]  Colette Laborde,et al.  Technology and Mathematics Education: A Multidimensional Study of the Evolution of Research and Innovation , 2003 .

[57]  Celia Hoyles,et al.  What can digital technologies take from and bring to research in mathematics education , 2003 .

[58]  Jeremy Kilpatrick,et al.  Third International Handbook on Mathematics Education , 2003 .

[59]  M. Tapan.  INTEGRATION OF ICT IN THE TEACHING OF MATHEMATICS IN SITUATIONS FOR TREATEMENT OF DIFFICULTIES IN PROVING , 2003 .

[60]  Jean-baptiste Lagrange,et al.  Tools and technologies in mathematical didactics , 2002 .

[61]  Colette Laborde,et al.  The case of Cabri-géomètre: learning geometry in a computer based environment , 1995 .

[62]  Wendy Johnstone,et al.  The role of computer algebra systems in mathematics teaching at upper secondary school , 1990 .

[63]  S. Papert.  Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas , 1980 .

[64]  Manuscript Preparation , 2022 .