Hemicerebellectomy and motor behaviour in rats. III. Kinematics of recovered spontaneous locomotion after lesions at different developmental stages

The locomotion of rats with a right hemicerebellectomy (HCb) performed in adulthood was compared by means of kinematic analysis with the locomotion of rats with a similar lesion performed on the first postnatal day. The age at which the animals received cerebellar lesion made a significant difference with respect to the locomotor strategies utilized in adulthood. During stance, neonatal operate rats showed a clear hyperextension of both hindlimbs but not of the forelimbs. Their locomotor posture was characterized by spinal flexion with the head held lower than normal. During swing, they showed a tendency towards 'high stepping'. Their steps were regular and symmetrical but hypometric. Adult lesioned animals displayed a marked extensor hypotonia, ipsilateral to the lesion during stance and a relevant hyperflexion affecting both sides, during swing. Alteration of the interlimb coordination and modified sequence of steps were also observed. Thus, a highly asymmetrical, impaired and unstable locomotion was displayed by this group of animals. The present findings demonstrate the importance of the age-at-lesion factor in determining the motor strategies in the recovery of locomotor function after HCb in the rat. This evidence is discussed in the light of the widespread anatomical remodelling already demonstrated following neonatal, but not adult, HCb in rats.

[1]  Milton Hildebrand,et al.  Analysis of Tetrapod Gaits: General Considerations and Symmetrical Gaits , 1976 .

[2]  M. Molinari,et al.  Increased collateralization of the cerebellothalamic pathway following neonatal hemicerebellectomy , 1986, Brain Research.

[3]  R. Granit.  Receptors and Sensory Perception , 1955 .

[4]  S. Grillner.  Control of Locomotion in Bipeds, Tetrapods, and Fish , 1981 .

[5]  B. Flumerfelt,et al.  Topographic specificity of aberrant cerebellorubral projections following neonatal hemicerebellectomy in the rat , 1984, Brain Research.

[6]  F. Murakami,et al.  Ipsilateral interpositorubral projection in the kitten and its relation to post-hemicerebellectomy plasticity. , 1990, Brain research. Developmental brain research.

[7]  Plasticity of spinovestibular projections in response to hemicerebellectomy in newborn rats , 1979, Neuroscience Letters.

[8]  O. Steward.  3 – Lesion-Induced Neuroplasticity and the Sparing or Recovery of Function following Early Brain Damage* , 1984 .

[9]  Stanley Finger,et al.  Brain damage and neuroplasticity: Mechanisms of recovery or development? , 1985, Brain Research Reviews.

[10]  M. Udo,et al.  Cerebellar control of locomotion: effects of cooling cerebellar intermediate cortex in high decerebrate and awake walking cats. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  N. Tsukahara,et al.  Synaptic plasticity in the mammalian central nervous system. , 1981, Annual review of neuroscience.

[12]  G. Orlovsky.  Activity of rubrospinal neurons during locomotion. , 1972, Brain research.

[13]  I. Whishaw,et al.  Sparing of skilled forelimb reaching and corticospinal projections after neonatal motor cortex removal or hemidecortication in the rat: support for the Kennard doctine , 1988, Brain Research.

[14]  S. Leong,et al.  Aberrant bilateral projections from the dentate and interposed nuclei in albino rats after neonatal lesions , 1975, Brain Research.

[15]  Carl Gans,et al.  Muscle activity in rat locomotion: Movement analysis and electromyography of the flexors and extensors of the elbow , 1975, Journal of morphology.

[16]  I. Whishaw,et al.  Recovery from early cortical lesions in rats. III. Neonatal removal of posterior parietal cortex has greater behavioral and anatomical effects than similar removals in adulthood , 1987, Behavioural Brain Research.

[17]  A. Gramsbergen,et al.  9 – The Effects of Early Cerebellar Hemispherectomy in the Rat: Behavioral, Neuroanatomical, and Electrophysiological Sequelae , 1984 .

[18]  S. Finger,et al.  Toward a Definition of Recovery of Function , 1988 .

[19]  Masao Ito.  The Cerebellum And Neural Control , 1984 .

[20]  R. Swenson,et al.  Plasticity of meso-diencephalic projections to the inferior olive following neonatal hemicerebellectomy in rats , 1982, Brain Research.

[21]  M. Goldberger,et al.  Infant lesion effect: II. Sparing and recovery of function after spinal cord damage in newborn and adult cats. , 1983, Brain research.

[22]  M. Molinari,et al.  Hemicerebellectomy and motor behaviour in rats. I. Development of motor function after neonatal lesion. , 1990, Experimental brain research.

[23]  S. Wada,et al.  Reticular neuron activities associated with locomotion in thalamic cats , 1982, Brain Research.

[24]  B. Jones,et al.  The efferent projections from the reticular formation and the locus coeruleus studied by anterograde and retrograde axonal transport in the rat , 1985, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[25]  G. Mihailoff,et al.  Corticopontine remodelling after cortical and/or cerebellar lesions in newborn rats , 1983, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[26]  Y. Arshavsky,et al.  Activity of rubrospinal neurons during locomotion and scratching in the cat , 1988, Behavioural Brain Research.

[27]  E. Eidelberg,et al.  Recovery of locomotor function in cats after localized cerebellar lesions , 1983, Brain Research.

[28]  A. Castro.  Projections of the superior cerebellar peduncle in rats and the development of new connections in response to neonatal hemicerebellectomy , 1978, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[29]  B. J. Winer.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[30]  J. Villablanca,et al.  Recovery of function after neonatal or adult hemispherectomy in cats. II. Limb bias and development, paw usage, locomotion and rehabilitative effects of exercise , 1986, Behavioural Brain Research.

[31]  S. Gilman.  The nature of cerebellar dyssynergia. , 1970, Modern trends in neurology.

[32]  N. Levere,et al.  Infant Brain Injury , 1988 .