Thematic Roles as Verb-specific Concepts

Thematic roles are typically viewed as slot and filler m echanisms in which the slots are devoid of content, or the content is limited to a few syntactically relevant features. This traditional view excludes important knowledge that people possess about who tends to do what to whom in specific situations. Thus it was extended here by treating thematic roles as verb-specific, feature-based concepts. In Experiment 1, subjects produced features for agent and patient roles such as "someone who is frightened". Role/filler typicality ratings, in which subjects provided judgements for questions such as "How common is it for a monster to frighten som eone?" (i.e. monster as an agent of frighten), were collected in Experiment 2A. In Experiment 2B, different subjects were presented with the role features from Experiment 1 and the typical agents and patients from Experiment 2A. They were asked to rate how central each of the role features was to the nominal concepts, and role/filler featural similarity was calculate...

[1]  Leonard Talmy,et al.  Semantics and syntax of motion , 1975 .

[2]  I. M. Schlesinger Cognitive space and linguistic case: Cognitive space , 1995 .

[3]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  "Schema Abstraction" in a Multiple-Trace Memory Model , 1986 .

[4]  D. Gary Miller,et al.  1. Theoretical Prerequisites , 1994 .

[5]  Ryszard S. Michalski,et al.  Categories and Concepts: Theoretical Views and Inductive Data Analysis , 1993 .

[6]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[7]  W D Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Sentence Perception as an Interactive Parallel Process , 1975, Science.

[8]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .

[9]  Richard Hudson,et al.  Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume 1. Theoretical prerequisites , 1990 .

[10]  Burgess Roland Curt Interaction of semantic, syntactic and visual factors in syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1991 .

[11]  U. Neisser Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in Categorization , 1989 .

[12]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A critical evaluation of the semantic-episodic distinction. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  L. Stowe Thematic Structures and Sentence Comprehension , 1989 .

[14]  C. Clifton,et al.  Thematic roles in sentence parsing. , 1993, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[15]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[16]  Peter W. Culicover Autonomy, Predication, and Thematic Relations , 1988 .

[17]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Thematic roles and language comprehension , 1988 .

[18]  E. Tulving Elements of episodic memory , 1983 .

[19]  C. A. Becker Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: An analysis of semantic strategies , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[20]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Combining prototypes: A selective modification model. , 1988 .

[21]  Eleanor Rosch,et al.  Principles of Categorization , 1978 .

[22]  C. Clifton,et al.  The independence of syntactic processing , 1986 .

[23]  David R. Dowty Thematic proto-roles and argument selection , 1991 .

[24]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Correlated properties in natural categories , 1984 .

[25]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  Probabilistic constraints and syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[26]  David William Foster Case Grammar: Development of the Matrix Model (1970-1978) by Walter A. Cook (review) , 1980 .

[27]  Mark Steedman,et al.  Interaction with context during human sentence processing , 1988, Cognition.

[28]  R. Langacker Foundations of cognitive grammar , 1983 .

[29]  D L Medin,et al.  Concepts and conceptual structure. , 1989, The American psychologist.

[30]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Constituent Attachment and Thematic Role Assignment in Sentence Processing: Influences of Content-Based Expectations , 1988 .

[31]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Semantic Influences On Parsing: Use of Thematic Role Information in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution , 1994 .

[32]  M. Posner,et al.  On the genesis of abstract ideas. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[33]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. , 1994, Psychological review.

[34]  K. Rayner,et al.  Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[35]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[36]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Subject Terms: Linguistics Language Eyes & eyesight Cognition & reasoning , 1995 .

[37]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Modeling the Influence of Thematic Fit (and Other Constraints) in On-line Sentence Comprehension , 1998 .

[38]  Michelle A. Hollander,et al.  Affectedness and direct objects: The role of lexical semantics in the acquisition of verb argument structure , 1991, Cognition.

[39]  Lance J. Rips,et al.  Combining Prototypes: A Selective Modification Model , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[40]  David Caplan,et al.  Interaction of verb selectional restrictions, noun animacy and syntactic form in sentence processing , 1994 .

[41]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences , 1983 .

[42]  R. Jackendoff The Status of Thematic Relations in Linguistic Theory , 1987 .

[43]  E. Rosch,et al.  Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[44]  William E. Nagy,et al.  Semantic constraints on lexical categories , 1990 .

[45]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar , 1972 .

[46]  L. Barsalou Context-independent and context-dependent information in concepts , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[47]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  The instability of graded structure: implications for the nature of concepts , 1987 .

[48]  Gregory L. Murphy,et al.  Noun phrase interpretation and conceptual combination , 1990 .

[49]  M. McCloskey,et al.  Natural categories: Well defined or fuzzy sets? , 1978 .

[50]  Francesco Orilia,et al.  Semantics and Cognition , 1991 .

[51]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Some interesting differences between nouns and verbs , 1981 .

[52]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Semantic effects on syntactic ambiguity resolution: Evidence for a constraint-based resolution process. , 1994 .

[53]  Charles J. Fillmore,et al.  THE CASE FOR CASE. , 1967 .

[54]  E. Tulving,et al.  Episodic and semantic memory , 1972 .

[55]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Verb Argument Structure in Parsing and Interpretation: Evidence from wh-Questions , 1995 .

[56]  L Frazier,et al.  Constraint satisfaction as a theory of sentence processing , 1995, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[57]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Resolving attachment ambiguities with multiple constraints , 1995, Cognition.

[58]  Walter Anthony Cook,et al.  Case Grammar: Development of the Matrix Model (1970-1978) , 1981 .

[59]  Christopher T. Kello,et al.  Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[60]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Distributed memory and the representation of general and specific information. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[61]  David R. Dowty,et al.  Toward a Nongrammatical Account of Thematic Roles , 1988 .

[62]  John C. Trueswell,et al.  The role of thematic structures in interpretation and parsing. , 1989 .

[63]  A. Tversky Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[64]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Categories and concepts , 1984 .

[65]  A. Garnham,et al.  Avoiding the garden path: Eye movements in context , 1992 .