Time evolution of an infinite projected entangled pair state: An algorithm from first principles

A typical quantum state obeying the area law for entanglement on an infinite 2D lattice can be represented by a tensor network ansatz -- known as an infinite projected entangled pair state (iPEPS) -- with a finite bond dimension $D$. Its real/imaginary time evolution can be split into small time steps. An application of a time step generates a new iPEPS with a bond dimension $k$ times the original one. The new iPEPS does not make optimal use of its enlarged bond dimension $kD$, hence in principle it can be represented accurately by a more compact ansatz, favourably with the original $D$. In this work we show how the more compact iPEPS can be optimized variationally to maximize its overlap with the new iPEPS. To compute the overlap we use the corner transfer matrix renormalization group (CTMRG). By simulating sudden quench of the transverse field in the 2D quantum Ising model with the proposed algorithm, we provide a proof of principle that real time evolution can be simulated with iPEPS. A similar proof is provided in the same model for imaginary time evolution of purification of its thermal states.

[1]  R. Orús,et al.  Infinite projected entangled-pair state algorithm for ruby and triangle-honeycomb lattices , 2017, 1711.04798.

[2]  A. Weichselbaum,et al.  Emergent spin-1 trimerized valence bond crystal in the spin-1/2 Heisenberg model on the star lattice , 2015, 1508.03451.

[3]  J. Chen,et al.  Optimized contraction scheme for tensor-network states , 2017, 1705.08577.

[4]  A. M. Ole's,et al.  Overcoming the sign problem at finite temperature: Quantum tensor network for the orbital eg model on an infinite square lattice , 2017, 1703.03586.

[5]  Shi-Ju Ran,et al.  Fermionic algebraic quantum spin liquid in an octa-kagome frustrated antiferromagnet , 2017, 1705.06006.

[6]  Garnet Kin-Lic Chan,et al.  Stripe order in the underdoped region of the two-dimensional Hubbard model , 2016, Science.

[7]  Hendrik Weimer,et al.  A simple tensor network algorithm for two-dimensional steady states , 2016, Nature Communications.

[8]  M. Batchelor,et al.  Finite-temperature fidelity and von Neumann entropy in the honeycomb spin lattice with quantum Ising interaction , 2016, 1611.10072.

[9]  J Chen,et al.  Gapless Spin-Liquid Ground State in the S=1/2 Kagome Antiferromagnet. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[10]  Jad C. Halimeh,et al.  Dynamical phase diagram of quantum spin chains with long-range interactions , 2016, 1610.02019.

[11]  M. Rams,et al.  Variational tensor network renormalization in imaginary time: Benchmark results in the Hubbard model at finite temperature , 2016, 1607.04016.

[12]  Frank Verstraete,et al.  Gradient methods for variational optimization of projected entangled-pair states , 2016, 1606.09170.

[13]  Philippe Corboz,et al.  Variational optimization with infinite projected entangled-pair states , 2016, 1605.03006.

[14]  Stefan Wessel,et al.  Thermal Ising transitions in the vicinity of two-dimensional quantum critical points , 2016, 1602.02096.

[15]  A. M. Ole's,et al.  Variational tensor network renormalization in imaginary time: Two-dimensional quantum compass model at finite temperature , 2015, 1512.07168.

[16]  P. Corboz Improved energy extrapolation with infinite projected entangled-pair states applied to the two-dimensional Hubbard model , 2015, 1508.04003.

[17]  A. H. Werner,et al.  Positive Tensor Network Approach for Simulating Open Quantum Many-Body Systems. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[18]  Michael Marien,et al.  Excitations and the tangent space of projected entangled-pair states , 2015, Physical Review B.

[19]  Piotr Czarnik,et al.  Variational approach to projected entangled pair states at finite temperature , 2015, 1503.01077.

[20]  Piotr Czarnik,et al.  Projected entangled pair states at finite temperature: Iterative self-consistent bond renormalization for exact imaginary time evolution , 2014, 1411.6778.

[21]  J. Ignacio Cirac,et al.  Approximating Gibbs states of local Hamiltonians efficiently with projected entangled pair states , 2014, 1406.2973.

[22]  Jens Eisert,et al.  Area laws and efficient descriptions of quantum many-body states , 2014, 1411.2995.

[23]  Matthias Troyer,et al.  Competing states in the t-J model: uniform D-wave state versus stripe state. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[24]  Frédéric Mila,et al.  Crystals of bound states in the magnetization plateaus of the Shastry-Sutherland model. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[25]  Piotr Czarnik,et al.  Fermionic projected entangled pair states at finite temperature , 2013, 1311.7272.

[26]  Guifre Vidal,et al.  Scaling of entanglement entropy in the (branching) multiscale entanglement renormalization ansatz , 2013, 1310.8372.

[27]  G. Evenbly,et al.  Real-space decoupling transformation for quantum many-body systems. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[28]  A. Honecker,et al.  Magnetization of SrCu2(BO3)2 in ultrahigh magnetic fields up to 118 T. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[29]  Roman Orus,et al.  A Practical Introduction to Tensor Networks: Matrix Product States and Projected Entangled Pair States , 2013, 1306.2164.

[30]  Yao-ban Chan Series expansions from the corner transfer matrix renormalization group method: II. Asymmetry and high-density hard squares , 2013 .

[31]  Bin Xi,et al.  Theory of network contractor dynamics for exploring thermodynamic properties of two-dimensional quantum lattice models , 2013, 1301.6439.

[32]  Lukasz Cincio,et al.  Projected entangled pair states at finite temperature: Imaginary time evolution with ancillas , 2012, 1209.0454.

[33]  Bin Xi,et al.  Optimized decimation of tensor networks with super-orthogonalization for two-dimensional quantum lattice models , 2012, 1205.5636.

[34]  Z. Y. Xie,et al.  Coarse-graining renormalization by higher-order singular value decomposition , 2012, 1201.1144.

[35]  Yao-ban Chan Series expansions from the corner transfer matrix renormalization group method: the hard-squares model , 2011, 1107.1677.

[36]  M. Troyer,et al.  Stripes in the two-dimensional t-J model with infinite projected entangled-pair states , 2011, 1104.5463.

[37]  Bin Xi,et al.  Linearized tensor renormalization group algorithm for the calculation of thermodynamic properties of quantum lattice models. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[38]  U. Schollwoeck The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states , 2010, 1008.3477.

[39]  Bela Bauer,et al.  Simulation of strongly correlated fermions in two spatial dimensions with fermionic projected entangled-pair states , 2009, 0912.0646.

[40]  J. Eisert,et al.  Unitary circuits for strongly correlated fermions , 2009, 0905.0669.

[41]  J. Ignacio Cirac,et al.  Fermionic projected entangled pair states , 2009, 0904.4667.

[42]  Jens Eisert,et al.  Contraction of fermionic operator circuits and the simulation of strongly correlated fermions , 2009, 0907.3689.

[43]  Philippe Corboz,et al.  Fermionic multiscale entanglement renormalization ansatz , 2009, 0907.3184.

[44]  Roman Orus,et al.  Simulation of two-dimensional quantum systems on an infinite lattice revisited: Corner transfer matrix for tensor contraction , 2009, 0905.3225.

[45]  Xiao-Gang Wen,et al.  Tensor-entanglement renormalization group approach as a unified method for symmetry breaking and topological phase transitions , 2008 .

[46]  T. Xiang,et al.  Accurate determination of tensor network state of quantum lattice models in two dimensions. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[47]  F. Verstraete,et al.  Matrix product states, projected entangled pair states, and variational renormalization group methods for quantum spin systems , 2008, 0907.2796.

[48]  Norbert Schuch,et al.  Entropy scaling and simulability by matrix product states. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[49]  Matthew B Hastings,et al.  Area laws in quantum systems: mutual information and correlations. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[50]  F. Verstraete,et al.  Classical simulation of infinite-size quantum lattice systems in two spatial dimensions. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[51]  G. Vidal Class of quantum many-body states that can be efficiently simulated. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[52]  M. Hastings,et al.  An area law for one-dimensional quantum systems , 2007, 0705.2024.

[53]  W. Zurek,et al.  Entropy of entanglement and correlations induced by a quench: Dynamics of a quantum phase transition in the quantum Ising model , 2007, cond-mat/0701768.

[54]  F. Verstraete,et al.  Variational study of hard-core bosons in a two-dimensional optical lattice using projected entangled pair states , 2006, cond-mat/0611522.

[55]  G. Vidal Entanglement renormalization. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[56]  U. Schollwoeck The density-matrix renormalization group , 2004, cond-mat/0409292.

[57]  A. Gendiar,et al.  Stable Optimization of a Tensor Product Variational State , 2003, cond-mat/0303376.

[58]  Youjin Deng,et al.  Cluster Monte Carlo simulation of the transverse Ising model. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[59]  A. Gendiar,et al.  Two-Dimensional Tensor Product Variational Formulation , 2000, cond-mat/0011103.

[60]  T. Nishino,et al.  Corner Transfer Matrix Renormalization Group Method , 1995, cond-mat/9507087.

[61]  White,et al.  Density-matrix algorithms for quantum renormalization groups. , 1993, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[62]  White,et al.  Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups. , 1992, Physical review letters.

[63]  M. Fannes,et al.  Finitely correlated states on quantum spin chains , 1992 .

[64]  R. Baxter Variational approximations for square lattice models in statistical mechanics , 1978 .

[65]  M. Suzuki,et al.  Relationship between d-Dimensional Quantal Spin Systems and (d+1)-Dimensional Ising Systems: Equivalence, Critical Exponents and Systematic Approximants of the Partition Function and Spin Correlations , 1976 .

[66]  Masuo Suzuki Pair-Product Model of Heisenberg Ferromagnets , 1966 .

[67]  H. Trotter On the product of semi-groups of operators , 1959 .