Dimensions of Thought Flow in Everyday Life

To what extent are three criteria of daydreaming–as thought that is fanciful, stimulus-independent, or undirected–equivalent? How are these properties of thought flow distributed during everyday activity? Students (N = 29) carrying a beeper described properties of their consciousness on a total of 1425 occasions by means of a Thought-Sampling Questionnaire, anxiety and depression measures, and activity report forms. Intrasubject analyses of thought variables identified eight orthogonal factors, including Visual Modality, Auditory Modality, Operantness (directedness), Attentiveness to External Stimulation, Controllability, Strangeness (fancifulness/bizarreness), Past Time Orientation, and Future Time Orientation. Most thought samples contained some interior monologue, largely independent of other variables. Thought properties were uncorrelated with affective variables, frustration of goals, and impulses to drink alcohol. Factors for individual differences differed sharply from the intrasubject results, with a single undifferentiated Vividness factor and controllability no longer a separate factor. The visual modality predominates for most individuals, about a third of thought is on the average predominantly undirected, an uncorrelated third is stimulus-independent, and about a quarter of thoughts contain at least traces of dream-like elements.

[1]  R. T. Hurlburt,et al.  P-Type Factor Analyses of Individuals' Thought Sampling Data. , 1985 .

[2]  R. Levine,et al.  Mapping Consciousness: Development of an Empirical-Phenomenological Approach , 1981 .

[3]  P. D. Farber,et al.  A profile instrument for the quantification and assessment of alcohol consumption. The Khavari Alcohol Test. , 1978, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[4]  S. McKelvie,et al.  Individual Differences in Reported Visual Imagery and Cognitive Performance , 1978, Perceptual and motor skills.

[5]  J. Singer,et al.  Consistency of daydreaming styles across samples of college male and female drug and alcohol users. , 1977, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[6]  A. Richardson.  The meaning and measurement of memory imagery , 1977 .

[7]  B. Lubin,et al.  Depression: Concept, Controversies and Some New Facts , 1976 .

[8]  D. Foulkes,et al.  Mental activity in relaxed wakefulness. , 1975, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[9]  H. Law,et al.  Factor analyses of the shortened form of Betts' questionnaire upon mental imagery , 1974 .

[10]  E. Klinger,et al.  Utterances to evaluate steps and control attention distinguish operant from respondent thought while thinking out loud , 1974 .

[11]  G. Ingersoll,et al.  A factor analysis of imagery tests , 1971 .

[12]  J. Antrobus,et al.  Studies in the stream of consciousness: Experimental enhancement and suppression of spontaneous cognitive processes , 1966 .

[13]  P. Bentler,et al.  Goodness-of-fit procedures for the evaluation and selection of log-linear models. , 1983 .

[14]  P. Sheehan,et al.  Assessment of mental imagery , 1983 .

[15]  E. Klinger,et al.  Dimensions of thought and imagery in normal waking states. , 1979 .

[16]  E. Klinger,et al.  Modes of Normal Conscious Flow , 1978 .

[17]  A. Richardson.  Mental Imagery , 1969 .

[18]  S. Freud.  Project for a Scientific Psychology , 1895 .